USA Law

Judicial Decision Making

Judicial Decision Making in United States

Judicial Decision Making

Dispensing with deception, curing with care: A response to Judge Dann on nullification, Diamond, Shari Seidman, 91: 20-25 (Jul-Aug ’07, AJS Judicature)

  • A Dissent on Dissent, Bennett, Robert W., 74: 255-260 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Distributive Justice: Majority Opinion Assignments in the Burger Court, Spaeth, Harold J., 67: 299-304 (Dec.-Jan. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Diversity Jurisdiction Through the Lens of Federalism, Sloviter, Dolores K., 76: 90-93, 99 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers, Koehler, Jonathan J., 76: 222-229 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Do arbitrators know something that judges don’t? Ruminations on arbitral and judicial case management, McArthur, John Burritt, 94: 107-118 (Nov-Dec ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Do Sex Offender Treatment Programs Work? (focus), Finn, Peter, 78: 250-252 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Do The Costs of The En Banc Proceeding Outweigh Its Advantages? (query), Kaufman, Irving R., 69: 7-8, 57 (Jun.-Jul. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Documenting Gender Bias in the Courts: The Task Force Approach, Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 70: 280-290 (Feb.-Mar. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Ducks redux (viewpoint), Lubet, Steven, 91: 223-225,259 (Mar-Apr ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Educating judges for adjudication of new life technologies, Zweig, Franklin M. and Cowdrey, Diane E., 83: 157-161 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Effective criticism (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 81: 232 (May-June ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Effects of capital punishment on the justice system: Reflections of a state supreme court justice, Dickson, Brent E., 89: 278-281 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Eight rules for judicial time management (focus), Wallace, Steven, 91: 87-91 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Eighth Circuit decision intensifies debate over publication and citation of appellate opinions, Braun, Jerome I., 84: 90-95 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Elder abuse curriculum available, Harris, Bonnie, 95: 141 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • The Electoral Connection and The Pace of Litigation in Kansas, Crynes, David A., 78: 242-246 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Equal protection after Bush v. Gore (viewpoint), Saks, Michael J., 85: 8, 42-43 (July-Aug. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Equality of arms? The individual vs. the international community in war crimes tribunals, Meernik, James, 86: 312-319 (May-June ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • The era of the choral Court, Maveety, Nancy, 89: 138-145 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • An Examination of Voting Behavior in the Louisiana Supreme Court, Hall, Melinda Gann, 71: 40-46 (Jun.-Jul. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Examining an Analogy: Does the Judicial Monster Eat Chaff?, Stow, Mary Lou and Spaeth, Harold J., 75: 294, 337 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Expert testimony (letter), Leake, Robert E., Jr., 84: 226 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Explaining transformations in Supreme Court policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech, Diana, 79: 80-85 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Exploring judicial behaviors in the laboratories of democracy, Wolff, Michael A., 83: 267-269 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Exploring the issues in private judging (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 77: 203-210 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Facing the Monster in the Judicial Closet: Rebutting a Presumption of Sloth, Brown, David J., 75: 291-293 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Fair jury awards (brief), Richert, David, 85: 100 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Federal Judges’ Role in Prisoner Litigation: What’s Necessary? What’s Proper?, Smith, Christopher E., 70: 144-150 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The Federal Magistrate System – Under New Scrutiny (focus), Krasno, Miriam R., 67: 256-257 (Nov. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Federal Report and Court Rulings Intensify DNA Evidence Debate (focus), Pilchen, Ira, 76: 41-42 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Fee shifting and public policy: the Equal Access to Justice Act, Mezey, Susan Gluck and Olson, Susan M., 77: 13-20 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The First-Term Performance of Justice Clarence Thomas, Smith, Christopher E. and Johnson, Scott P., 76: 172-178 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The First-Term Performance of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce Ann, Hensley, Thomas R., and Johnson, Scott P., 78: 74-80 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The first-term performance of Justice Stephen Breyer, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce Ann, and Hensley, Thomas R., 79: 74-79 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Florida’s Sentencing Guidelines: Surviving – But Just Barely, Holten, N. Gary and Handberg, Roger, 73: 259-267 (Feb.-Mar. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • FOIA Uncovers Prosecutorial Abuse (letter), Korn, Walter, 66: 384 (Apr. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Freshman Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1921-1991, Brown, Terry and Scheb, John M., II, 76: 239-243 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Friendly Fire: Amici Curiae and Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, Behuniak-Long, Susan, 74: 261-270 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The Function and Importance of Appellate Oral Argument: Some Views of Lawyers and Federal Judges, Wasby, Stephen L., 65: 340-353 (Feb. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Fuzzy logic and judicial decision making, Cook, Beverly Blair, 85: 70-77, 99 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Gender Equality In The Courts: Still On The Judicial Agenda (focus), Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 77: 110-113 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Gender, consciousness raising, and decision making on the Supreme Court of Canada,, Jilani, Nadia A., Songer, Donald R., and Johnson, Susan W., 94: 59-69 (sep-oct ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • George W. Bush’s potential Supreme Court nominees: what impact might they have?, Manning, Kenneth L., Carroll, Bruce A., and Carp, Robert A., 85: 278-284 (May-June ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Granted, Vacated, and Remanded – Shedding Light on a Dark Corner of Supreme Court Practice, Hellman, Arthur D., 67: 389-401 (Mar. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Grounds for judicial impeachment (viewpoint), Finnegan, Lawrence J., Jr., 82: 155, 193 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Handling child abuse cases (letter), Edwards, Leonard, 81: 98 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Harris, Bonnie, Oldfather, Chad, 95: 94-95, 97 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Hawaii chapter recommends unpublished opinions be citable (focus), Stanik, Kristine, 86: 162 (Nov.-Dec. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • A Helpful and Timely Reminder (letter), Scheb, John M., 68: 5 (Jun.-Jul. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • The Hidden Conservatism of the State Court “Revolution”, Latzer, Barry, 74: 190-197 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Hope, fear, and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology, Gold, Richard E., 83: 132-138 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • How do courts of appeals en banc decisions fare in the U.S. Supreme Court?, Wasby, Stephen L., 85: 182-189 (Jan.-Feb ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • How emotion affects the trial process, Miller, Monica K., Greene, Edie, Dietrich, Hannah, Chamberlain, Jared, and Singer, Julie A., 92: 56-64 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • How judges respond to drunk drivers, Breer, M. Lynn, Schwartz, Abby, Schillo, Barbara A., and Savage, Deborah, 87: 72-78, 89 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • How Supreme Court justices respond to litigant requests to overturn precedent, Segal, Jeffrey A. and Howard, Robert M., 85: 148-157 (Nov.-Dec. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • How The Shift From Hourly Rates Will Affect The Justice System, Barker, Sarah Evans, 77: 201-202 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Human Genome Project and the courts: gene therapy and beyond, Mehlman, Maxwell J., 83: 124-130 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The ideology of state supreme court chief justice, a
    n update, Langer, Laura, 90: 37-38 (July-Aug ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • The ideology of state supreme court chief justices, Langer, Laura and Wilhelm, Teena, 89: 78-86 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Ideology on the bench (letter), Thomas, Thomas N., 80: 205 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Ideology, Strategy and Supreme Court Decisions: William Rehnquist as Chief Justice, Rohde, David W. and Spaeth, Harold J., 72: 247-250 (Dec.-Jan. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • Immigrants and other cultural minorities as non-traditional plaintiffs: Culture as a factor in determining tort damages, Donald, Bernice Bouie and Brooks, Brennan Tyler, 92: 220-223 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • The impact of behavioral genetics on the law and the courts, Rothstein, Mark A., 83: 116-123 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The impacts of capital cases on a federal trial court, Goldberger, Benjamin A., 89: 274-277 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Imposing the Death Penalty on Juvenile Murders: A Constitutional Assessment, Gewerth, Kenneth E. and Dorne, Clifford K., 75: 6-15 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Improving appellate opinions (viewpoint), Cappalli, Richard, 83: 286-287, 318-320 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Increasing juror participation in trials through note taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and Penrod, Steven, 79: 256-262 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Independence (letter), Bell, Robert Holmes, 80: 205, 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Independence of character (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Independent research on scientific issues by judges must be carefully weighed and considered, Marlow, George D., 90: 66-67 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Individual justices and the solicitor general: The amicus curiae cases, 1953-2000, Deen, Rebecca E., Ignagni, Joseph, and Meernik, James, 89: 68-77 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • The Influence of the Solicitor General on Supreme Court Disposition of Federal Circuit Court Decisions: A Closer Look at the Ninth Circuit Record, Uelmen, Gerald F., 69: 360-366 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The institutional stability of the judiciary in the aftermath of terrorism, Shortell, Christopher and Smith, Charles Anthony, 88: 172-177 (Jan.-Feb. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Interaction and Decisionmaking on Collegial Courts: A Panel Discussion (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 71: 339-344 (Apr.-May ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • An Intercircuit Panel of the United States Court of Appeals: The Cost of Structural Change, Winters, Richard H., 70: 31-40 (Jun.-Jul. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The interdependence of science and law, Breyer, Stephen, 82: 24-27 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • International criminal defense: The influence of attorney background on judicial decision making at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Meernik, James and Farris, Christopher, 89: 326-333 (May-June ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Interpreting the Constitution (letter), Meese, Edwin, III, 69: 320 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Interstate Certification of Questions of Law: A Valuable Process in Need of Reform, Robbins, Ira P., 76: 125-132 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Is childhood obesity a form of child abuse? Factors to consider in judicial rulings, Hayes, Jenna T. and Sicafuse, Lorie L., 94: 20-27 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Is Life Tenure on the Supreme Court Good for the Country? (query), Fleming, Macklin, 70: 322-323, 375 (Apr.-May ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Is There A More Systematic Way to Manage Publication of Opinions? (query), George, Joyce J., 71: 305, 359-360 (Apr.-May ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Is There No Alternative To The Hard Line In Juvenile Justice? (query), Conrad, John, 67: 162-163, 203-206 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Issues in judicial independence and accountability, Author, No, 88: 114-121 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • John Paul Stevens: A judicial role model (editorial), Author, No, 94: 4, 41 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judge Baer controversy, Newman, Jon O., 80: 156-164 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges and epidemiological evidence (focus), Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Dobbin, Shirley A., Gatowski, Sophia I., Dahir, Veronica, and Merlino, Mara L., 87: 38-39 (July-Aug. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges are human, too (viewpoint), Sisk, Gregory C., 83: 178-179, 211-212 (Jan.-Feb. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges as scholars: Are they? Should they be? (viewpoint), Noonan, John T., Jr., 84: 7-9, 47 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges disagree (letter), Cohn, Avern, 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judging by heuristic: cognitive illusions in judicial decision making, Guthrie, Chris, Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., and Wistrich, Andrew J., 86: 44-50 (July-Aug. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Activism and the Concept of Original Intent, Bennett, Robert W., 69: 219-223 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Activism and the Identity of the Legal Profession (review essay), White, G. Edward, 67: 246-255 (Nov. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial activism in Canada and the U.S., Miller, Mark C., 81: 262-265 (May-June ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Activism: Another View (letter), Downs, Harry, 67: 420, 466 (Apr. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Attitudes Toward Child Sexual Abuse: A Preliminary Examination, Saunders, Edward J., 70: 95-98 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial attitudes towards jury reform, Brody, David C. and Neiswender, John, 83: 298-303 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial credibility at issue (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial decision making and the impact of election year rhetoric, Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 26-33 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial decision making at the ITCY: The influence of home country characteristics, Meernik, James, Aloisi, Rosa, and Ding, Jennifer, 95: 171-176 (Jan.-Feb. ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial disqualification: what do judges think?, Goldschmidt, Jona and Shaman, Jeffrey M., 80: 68-72 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Elections: The California Experience, Grodin, Joseph, 70: 365-369 (Apr.-May ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial ideology and the decision to publish: Voting and publication patterns in Ninth Circuit asylum cases, Law, David S., 89: 212-219 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial independence (editorial), Leben, Steve and Burke, Kevin, 95: 205-206 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial independence and human rights protection around the world, Keith, Linda Camp, 85: 194-200 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • The judicial independence task force, Daffron, Sandra Ratcliff, 81: 49 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial independence, the power of the purse, and inherent judicial powers, Webb, G. Gregg and Whittington, Keith E., 88: 12-19, 45 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Independence: An Introduction (introduction), Author, No, 80: 155 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial override in Alabama: a singular example in death sentencing (brief), Ream, Michael Ream, 95: 49 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial perceptions of consensual norms on state supreme courts, Swanson, Rick A., 91: 186-196 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Recantation: Homage to Baron Bramwell, Fidell, Eugene R., 71: 259-261 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Responses to Prison Crowding, Finn, Peter, 67: 318, 325 (Feb. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial review is exercised properly, Cohn, Avern, 82: 29, 32-34 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judicial Role In Bulgaria’s Struggle For Human Rights, Melone, Albert P. and Hays, Carol E., 77: 248-253 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial roles in state high courts, Swanson, Rick A., 94: 168-177 (Jan-Feb ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial settlement ethics (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 81: 48 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS
    Judicature)
  • Judicial Supervision of the Guilty Plea Process: A Study of Six Jurisdictions, McDonald, William F., 70: 203-215 (Dec.-Jan. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judiciary Act of 1789: The Formal Origin of Federal Judicial Review, Mendelson, Wallace, 76: 133-136 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The judiciary is too powerful, Taylor, Clifford, 82: 28, 30-32 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicious Consideration (letter), Rosenhouse, Michael A., 65: 56 (Aug. ’81, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicious use of juror anonymity (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 86: 180 (Jan.-Feb. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Just what made drug courts successful?, Burke, Kevin S., 94: 119-127 (Nov-Dec ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Antonin Scalia: A First Year Freshman Effect?, Rubin, Thea F. and Melone, Albert P., 72: 98-102 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Brennan and the Brandenburg decision-a lawgiver in action, Schwartz, Bernard, 79: 24-29 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dissent assignment, Cook, Beverly Blair, 79: 17-23 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Frankfurter and Justice Reed: Friendship and Lobbying on the Court, Canon, Bradley C., Greenfield, Kimberly, and Fleming, Jason S., 78: 224-231 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice O’Connor and the Equal Protection Clause: A Feminine Voice?, Aliotta, Jilda M., 78: 232-235 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and the “Freshman Effect”, Scheb, John M., II and Ailshie, Lee W., 69: 9-12 (Jun.-Jul. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Juvenile Justice (letter), Bradshaw, H. Stewart, 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Keeping the gate: the evolving role of the judiciary in admitting scientific evidence, Walsh, Joseph T., 83: 140-143 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Keeping Up With Justice: Automation and the New Activism, Lateef, Noel V., 67: 213-223 (Nov. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Law And Science (letter), Kaye, D.H., 77: 175 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Law By Elimination? Depublication in the California Supreme Court, Gerstein, Robert S., 67: 292, 298 (Dec.-Jan. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Law, Morals and Justice Holmes, Kellogg, Frederick R., 69: 214-218 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Legal staff and the dynamics of appellate decision making, Norman, Douglas K., 84: 175-177 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • The legal system’s use of epidemiology, Bryant, Arthur H. and Reinert, Alexander A., 87: 12-21 (July-Aug. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • The legal system’s use of epidemiology: Some clarification, Korzeniewski, Steven James, 88: 137-139, 144 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Legislative-judicial relations on contested issues: Taxes and same-sex marriage, DeMary, Michele, 89: 202-211 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Legitimate activities (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Legitimate criticism (letter), Conners, Frank J., 80: 5 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The Liability of Junk and the Junk of Liability: Evidentiary Misdeeds in the Courts (review essay), Sperlich, Peter W., 75: 273-275, 281 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The Lima Rehab Project: A Program That Benefits All, Snellenburg, Sidney C., 72: 251-252 (Dec.-Jan. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The limits of White (viewpoint), Gray, Cynthia, 89: 315-316, 352 (May-June ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • The Links Between Platform-Based Appointment Criteria and Trial Judges’ Abortion Judgments, Alumbaugh, Steve and Rowland, C.K., 74: 153-162 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Living with the death penalty, Leyte-Vidal, Henry and Silverman, Scott J., 89: 270-273 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Local Response to Prison Crowding (letter), Cramer, Judith A., 68: 4-5 (Jun.-Jul. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Maintaining Citizen Sovereignty (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 69: 320-321 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Making Intermediate Appellate Courts Final: Assessing Jurisdictional Changes in Florida’s Appellate Courts, Scheb, John M. and Scheb, John M., II, 67: 474-485 (May ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Mandatory ADR: Can We Talk? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 78: 272, 321 (May-Jun. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decision Making: Problems and Prospects, Slotnick, Elliot E., 75: 128-142 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Meeting the challenge of rape trials (focus), Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 84: 328-329 (May-June ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • The Memos of Supreme Court Law Clerk William Rehnquist: Conservative Tracts, or Mirrors of His Justice’s Mind?, Brenner, Saul, 76: 77-81 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Minitrials and matchmakers: Styles of conducting settlement conferences, Hyman, Jonathan M. and Heumann, Milton, 80: 123-129 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Misguided judicial reform (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 81: 4 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A Modest Experiment (letter), Kelly, Michael J., 75: 288-289 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Monstrous Analysis (letter), Griffith, Frederick J., III, 75: 288 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Moral Authority And Gender Difference: Georgia Bullock And The Los Angeles Women’s Court, Cook, Beverly Blair, 77: 144-155 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • More facts needed (letter), Flanders, Steven, 81: 6 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Motion on the Merits: An Effective Response to Appellate Congestion and Delay (focus), Green, Dale M. and Keyes, Michael F., 70: 168-170 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Mr. Brown’s Response, Brown, David J., 75: 337 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • My “Freshman Years” On The Court of Appeals, Kaye, Judith S., 70: 166-167 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The Nature Of Feminist Jurisprudence, Binion, Gayle, 77: 140-143 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The need for improved adult guardianship data, Uekert, Brenda K. and Schauffler, Richard, 93: 201-205 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • Neither Gone nor Forgotten: Evaluating the potential impact of senior status judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, Holmes, Lisa M., Solberg, Rorie L., Spill, and Haire, Susan B, 95: 227-236 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • A new approach to court reform (viewpoint), Zimmerman, Michael D., 82: 108-111 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • A new approach to long-range planning for the federal courts (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 79: 4-5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The new certiorari courts (viewpoint), Reynolds, William L. and Richman, William M., 80: 206-212 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A New Dimension (letter), Cohn, Avern, 76: 170 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • New Mexico creates a DWI drug court (focus), Mays, G. Larry, Ryan, Stephen G., and Bejarano, Cindy, 81: 122-124 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Nonlegal advice: The amicus briefs in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, Rossotti, Jack E., Natelson, Laura, and Tatalovich, Raymond, 81: 118-121 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Not guilty (letter), Dann, B, Michael, 91: 56 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Not supported by data (letter), Newman, Jon O., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The O’Connor Project: Intervening early to eliminate the need for racial preferences in higher education, Schorr, Lisbeth B., 88: 92-96 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • On The Judicial Agenda for The 80s: Equal Treatment for Men and Women In The Courts, Wikler, Norma Juliet, 64: 202-209 (Nov. ’80, AJS Judicature)
  • On the perils of drawing inferences about Supreme Court justices from their first few years of service, Epstein, Lee, Quinn, Kevin, Martin, Andrew D., and Segal, Jeffrey A., 91: 168-179 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Opinion assignment on the Rehnquist Court, Maltzman, Forrest and Wahlbeck, Paul J., 89: 121-126, 181 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Opinion specialization: Alive and well in the federal appellate judiciary (viewpoint), Cheng, Edward K., 92: 103-105 (3, AJS Judicature)
  • Original intent (letter), Gangi, William, 80: 110, 145 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Peering behind the velvet curtain: Lessons from a year inside the federal courts, Gould, Jon B., 92: 65-69 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • The Per Curiam Opinion: Its Nature and Functions, Wasby, Stephen L., Peterson, Steven, Schubert, James, and Schubert, Glendon, 76: 29-38 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Roxanne, 79: 185-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 79: 303-309 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Play in the system (letter), Cohn, Avern, 82: 250 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Pleading and the dilemmas of modern American procedure, Burbank, Stephen B., 93: 109-120 (3, AJS Judicature)
  • Polarization and Change in the Federal Courts: En Banc Decisions in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Smith, Christopher E., 74: 133-137 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Policy statements or symbolic politics? Explaining congressional court-limiting attempts, Bell, Lauren C. and Scott, Kevin M., 89: 196-201 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Political affiliation of appointing president and the outcome of Tax Court cases, Altieri, Mark P., Apple, Jerome E., Marquette, Penny, and Moore, Charles K., 84: 310-313 (May-June ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Political attacks on the judiciary, Bright, Stephen B., 80: 165-173 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The politicization of the judiciary (viewpoint), Friedman, Terry B., 82: 6-7 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Politics in Brown and white: Resegregation in America, Cann, Steven, 88: 74-78 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • The politics of the federal judiciary: Tiered appellate decisionmaking, Burbank, Stephen B., 89: 20-24 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Post-Conviction Review – What State Trial Courts Can Do To Reduce Problems, Remington, Frank J., 72: 53-57 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Postrealism: Should Ignorance Be Elevated To A Principle of Adjudication?, Sperlich, Peter W., 64: 93-98 (Aug. ’80, AJS Judicature)
  • Power on the Court: Chief Justice Rehnquist’s Opinion Assignments, Davis, Sue, 74: 66-72 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • President Clinton’s district judges: “extreme liberals” or just plain moderates?, Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald, 84: 282-288 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Presiding in Criminal Court: An Introduction (introduction), Morris, Norval and Tonry, Michael, 72: 7-11 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Pretrial Motions in a U.S. District Court: The Role of the Law Clerk, Hall, Melinda Gann, 74: 65 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The pretrial release decision, Clark, John and Henry, D. Alan, 81: 76-81 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The problems of applying Daubert to psychological syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia I., and Dobbin, Shirley A., 79: 10-16 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Problem-solving justice: a quiet revolution (viewpoint), Berman, Greg and Feinblatt, John, 86: 182, 213 (Jan.-Feb. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Dorin’s Reply (letter), Dorin, Dennis D., 67: 161, 206 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Howard Replies (letter), Howard, J. Woodford, Jr., 66: 281 (Feb. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Olson Responds (letter), Olson, Susan M., 68: 305 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Robbins Responds (letter), Robbins, Ira P., 84: 226 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Sanborn Comments (letter), Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Segal responds (letter), Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Smith Responds (letter), Smith, Christopher E., 78: 220 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Promoting judicial independence (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 80: 152 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Promoting Public Understanding of the Supreme Court (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 76: 4, 42 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Proper perspective (letter), Del, Sole, Joseph, A., 84: 226 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Psychological Disability Among Judges and Other Professionals: Some Causes and Cures, Suran, Bernard G., 66: 184-193 (Nov. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court, Marshall, Thomas R., 74: 322-329 (Apr.-May ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Public outreach: the cornerstone of judicial independence, Esterling, Kevin M., 82: 66-69 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Public perception of the Supreme Court in the 1990s, Lyons, William and Scheb, John M., II, 82: 66-69 (Sept.-Oct. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The quest for the common good in judging (viewpoint), Duff, Brian Barnett, 80: 111, 145-156 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • A quota system? (letter), Abraham, Henry J., 83: 5 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Racial disproportionality in child welfare: False logic and dangerous misunderstandings, Russell, Jesse, 95: 109-115 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Reagan’s Appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals: The Continuation of a Judicial Revolution, Gottschall, Jon, 70: 48-54 (Jun.-Jul. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • A reality check on court/media relations, Alexander, S. L., 84: 146-149 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Ream, Michael Ream (brief), Harris, Bonnie, 95: 140 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Reasoned Writing (letter), Fine, Ralph Adam, 65: 456 (May ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Recusing the fact-finder judge: An argument for restricting the “extra-judicial source” test (viewpoint), Phillips, Joe and Lee, Se-In, 95: 8-11 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing judicial stress through mentoring, Bremer, Celeste F., 87: 244-251 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court And American Values, Comiskey, Michael, 77: 261-267 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court and support of federal agencies, Ignagni, Joseph, Deen, Rebecca E., and Meernik, James, 89: 154-160, 181 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Rehnquist Court Disposition of Lower Court Decisions: Affirmation Not Reversal, Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., 74: 84-88 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court’s shrinking plenary docket, O’Brien, David M., 81: 58-65 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Reining in the federal judiciary, Meese, Edwin, III and DeHart, Rhett, 80: 178-183 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A rejected premise (letter), Rittenberg, Leon, III, 80: 295 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Justice Stevens? temperance, Greene, Jamal, 94: 11 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Three lessons learned, Marder, Nancy S., 94: 10 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Three memorable opinions, Lee, Carol, 94: 9-10 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Report proposes reforms for family law court in California (brief), Richert, David, 93: 259-260 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • The Representative Role Of Women Judges, Martin, Elaine, 77: 166-173 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Responding to elder abuse: What judges and court personnel should know (brief), Richert, David, 94: 92 (sep-oct ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Restraint In Enviromental Cases By Reagan-Bush Judicial Appointees, Wenner, Lettie M. and Ostberg, Cynthia, 77: 217-220 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Retention Elections And Judicial Behavior, Aspin, Larry T. and Hall, William K., 77: 306-315 (May-Jun. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Return to the first principles of juvenile justice (editorial), No, Author, 92: 256, 330 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • A revealing memo (letter), Cook, Beverly Blair, 80: 5 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The Revenue Agent Role
    of State Courts: Implications for the Administration and Adjudication, Nase, Jonathan P., 76: 195-200 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Revisiting the Freshman Effect Hypothesis: The First Two Terms of Justice Anthony Kennedy, Melone, Albert P., 74: 6-13 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The right decision on the juvenile death penalty, Bradley, Craig M., 89: 302-303, 305 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Right on: The decision-making behavior of George W. Bush?s judicial appointees, Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald, 92: 312-319 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Risk assessment and intimate partner sexual abuse: The hidden dimension of domestic violence, Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 93: 161-163 (4, AJS Judicature)
  • The role of a judge in a democracy (viewpoint), Barak, Aharon, 88: 199-201 (Mar.-Apr. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Role Orientations And Women State Supreme Court Justices, Allen, David W. and Wall, Diane E., 77: 156-165 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Rose Bird and the Politics of Judicial Accountability in California, Culver, John H. and Wold, John T., 70: 81-89 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Rubber Stamp or Reason? (letter), Wasby, Stephen L. and Bierman, Luke, 75: 289 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Russell, Jesse (viewpoint), Burke, Kevin S., 95: 251-254 (May-June ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • A Salacious Innuendo? (letter), Henry, M. L., Jr., 70: 321 (Apr.-May ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Schizophrenia (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 85: 49 (July-Aug. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Science education for judges: What, where, and by whom? (focus), Merlino, Mara L., Dillehay, Ronald C., Dahir, Veronica, and Maxwell, Dionne, 86: 210-213 (Jan.-Feb. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Science vs. justice (letter), Cousins, William J., 83: 5, 38 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Scrutinizing expert testimony (brief), Richert, David, 84: 156 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Sealed court records (brief), Richert, David, 84: 156 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Seating the blind juror, Crehan, Matthew J., 81: 104-110 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A second chance for justice: Illinois’ post-trial forensic testing law, O’Reilly, Gregory W., 81: 114-117 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Second-class justice, first-class punishment: The use of juvenile records in sentencing adults, Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 81: 206-213 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The security of our liberty (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 4, 44-45 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Seeking a strategy: William J. Brennan’s dissent assignments, Wood, Sandra L. and Gansle, Gary M., 81: 73-75 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Selective Reporting and the Communication of Legal Rights in England, Atkins, Burton M., 76: 58-67 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Conference Examines Reform Impact (focus), Krasno, Miriam R., 67: 409-411 (Mar. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Guidelines and the Changing Composition of Criminal Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis, Williams, Jimmy J., 76: 94-96 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Guidelines Of The Right Sort (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 78: 168 (Jan.-Feb. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing reform in the wake of Booker (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 196, 231 (Mar.-Apr. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Should judges do independent research on scientific issues?, Cheng, Edward K., 90: 58-61 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Should Judges Impose Sanctions for False Pleadings? (query), Curry, Richard L., 67: 57, 99-100 (Aug. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Should Litigants Have a Choice Between Specialized Courts and Courts of General Jurisdiction?, Jordan, Ellen R., 66: 14-27 (Jun.-Jul. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • The significance of Brown, Ogletree, Charles J., Jr., 88: 66-72 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Social Leadership, Humor, and Supreme Court Decisionmaking, Dorin, Dennis D., 66: 462-468 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The solicitor general as amicus, 1953-2000: How influential?, Ignagni, Joseph, Deen, Rebecca E., and Meernik, James, 87: 60-71 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Some Current Debates, White, Byron R., 73: 155-158, 161 (Oct.-Nov. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The Spirit of Dissent, Campbell, J. Louis, III, 66: 304-312 (Feb. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • State Panels Document Racial, Ethnic Bias In The Courts (focus), Tyler, Arline S. and Montano, Steven, 78: 154-156, 161 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • State Supreme Court Commitment to State Law, Esler, Michael, 78: 25-32 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Stow and Spaeth Respond (letter), Stow, Mary Lou and Spaeth, Harold J., 75: 289-290 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Strengthening the court-legislature relationship (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 81: 96 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 79: 181-184 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and certiorari: what determines the agenda? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 112 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and Grass Roots: Whom Does the Court Represent Best?, Marshall, Thomas R., 76: 22-28 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and Precedent: An Analysis of Natural Courts and Reversal Trends, Banks, Christopher P., 75: 262-268 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Supreme Court and public support for rights claims, Ignagni, Joseph and Marshall, Thomas R., 78: 146-151 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Supreme Court Disposition of Federal Circuit Court Decisions, Spaeth, Harold J., 68: 245-250 (Dec.-Jan. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • A Supreme Court without Protestants: Does it matter?, Scheb, John M., II, Sharma, Hemant Kumar, and Glennon, Colin, 94: 12-15 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court’s experience gap (viewpoint), Fortunato, Stephen J., Jr., 82: 251-254, 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Therapeutic jurisprudence (brief), Richert, David, 84: 103 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Therapeutic jurisprudence, Hora, Peggy Fulton and Schma, William G., 82: 8-12 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill, Lurigio, Arthur J., Watson, Amy, Luchins, Daniel J., and Hanrahan, Patricia, 84: 184-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Three branches, not two: Congress should reconsider recent assaults on federal court sentencing discretion (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 86: 276, 324 (May-June ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Tinkering with the machinery of death: Capital punishment’s toll on the American judiciary, Hintze, Michael, 89: 254-257 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Triage in appellate courts: cross-level comparison, Wasby, Stephen L. and Ginn, Martha Humphries, 88: 216-224 (Mar.-Apr. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisenberg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 79: 176-180, 199 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Tribute to Justice Brennan, Seitz, Collins J., Aldisert, Ruggero J., Gibbons, John J., Seitz, Virginia A., and Pollak, Louis H., 74: 238-244 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The trouble with ‘scarlet letter’ punishments (viewpoint), Litowitz, Douglas, 81: 52-57 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Twenty Years of Sentencing Reform: Steps Forward, Steps Backward, Tonry, Michael, 78: 169-172 (Jan.-Feb. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Tyranny of the majority (letter), Diamond, Hymen, 80: 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Data Base: Providing new insights into the Court, Spaeth, Harold J. and Segal, Jeffrey A., 83: 228-235 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • U.S. Supreme Court Review of State High Court Decisions, Kilwein, John C. and Brisbin, Richard A., Jr., 78: 33-40, 46 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • U.S. Supreme Court review of state high court decisions: From the Warren through the Rehnquist Courts, Kilwein, John C. and Brisbin, Richard A., Jr.,
    89: 146-153, 183 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Understanding statutes by understanding the drafters, Stark, Jack, 85: 190-193 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • United States District Courts En Banc – Resolving the Ambiguities, Bartels, John R., 73: 40-42 (Jun.-Jul. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The United States Supreme Court and judicial review of Congress, 1803-2001, Keith, Linda Camp, 90: 166-176 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Updated reference manual on scientific evidence for judges is released (brief), Harris, Bonnie, 95: 141 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • The Use And Misuse Of Expert Evidence In The Courts (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 77: 68-76 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The Use of Court-Appointed Experts in Federal Courts, Cecil, Joe S. and Willging, Thomas E., 78: 41-46 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Use of Fines by Trial Court Judges, Cole, George F., Mahoney, Barry, Thornton, Marlene, and Hanson, Roger A., 71: 325-333 (Apr.-May ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Victim and execution impact statements: What judges should know about case law and psychological research,, Wolff, Kevin T. and Miller, Monica K., 92: 148-157 (4, AJS Judicature)
  • Video evidence and summary judgment: The procedure of Scott v. Harris, Wasserman, Howard M., 91: 180-184 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Videotape transcripts (letter), Akenhead, Vicki, 82: 154 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Videotaped trial transcripts (letter), Burrage, Jeanette, 82: 106 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Videotaped trial transcripts for juror deliberations, Hartmus, Diane M. and Levine, James P., 82: 84-87, 96 (Sept.-Oct. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The Voice of Sandra Day O’Connor, Davis, Sue, 77: 134-139 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Voting Behavior And Gender On The U.S. Courts Of Appeals, Davis, Sue, Haire, Susan, and Songer, Donald R., 77: 129-133 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The voting behavior of Clinton’s courts of appeals appointees, Haire, Susan B., Humphries, Martha Anne, and Songer, Donald R., 84: 274-281 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • The Voting Behavior of Judges Appointed by President Bush, Carp, Robert A., Songer, Donald R., Rowland, C.K., Stidham, Ronald, and Richey-Tracy, Lisa, 76: 298-302 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The voting behavior of President Clinton’s judicial appointees, Stidham, Ronald, Carp, Robert A., and Songer, Donald R., 80: 16-20 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • What Can the American Adversary System Learn from an Inquisitorial System of Justice? (query), Strier, Franklin, 76: 109-111, 161-162 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • What do judges think about the Feeney Amendment?, Davis, Andre M., Piersol, Lawrence L., and Tacha, Deanell Reece, 88: 8-11 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • What does it mean to be a good lawyer?: Prosecutors, defenders and problem-solving courts, Feinblatt, John and Denckla, Derek, 84: 206-214 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • What is a traditional judge anyway? Problem solving in the state courts, Berman, Greg, 84: 78-85 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • What judges can learn from gender bias task force studies, Jackson, Vicki C., 81: 15-21 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • What Judges Should Know About The Sociology Of Science, Jasanoff, Shelia, 77: 77-82 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • What the growing use of pre-dispute binding arbitration means for the judiciary (viewpoint), Williams, Jackson, 85: 266-267 (May-June ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • What’s Old and What’s New About the Insanity Plea (review essay), Milner, Neal, 67: 499-509 (May ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • What’s So Funny? (letter), Fishler, Bennett H., Jr., 67: 161 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • When all eyes are watching: Trial characteristics and practices in notorious trials (focus), Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., 91: 197-201 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • When Justices Need Lawyers: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legal Office , Winkle, John W., III and Swann, Martha B., 76: 244-249 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • White-Collar v. Street Crime Sentencing Disparity: How Judges See the Problem, Pollack, Harriet and Smith, Alexander B., 67: 174-182 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Who Decides About Oral Argument? (letter), Hill, James C., 66: 280-281 (Feb. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Who Makes Policy? (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 68: 304-305 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Who Voted With Whom? (letter), Baxter, Hugh, 78: 220 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Who, If Not Judges? (letter), Baker, Dennis M., 67: 160 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Why should we care about independent and accountable judges? (viewpoint), Fein, Bruce and Neuborne, Burt, 84: 58-63 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Women Justices In Texas (letter), Phillips, Thomas R., 77: 184 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Women On The Bench: A Different Voice?, Martin, Elaine, 77: 126-128 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Women’s Rights Litigation in the 1980s: More of the Same?, George, Tracey E. and Epstein, Lee, 74: 314-321 (Apr.-May ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The work of appellate judges (viewpoint), Sweeney, Dennis J., 85: 59, 94-95 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)

  • Resources

    Further Reading

    • Judicial diversity—an essential component of a fair justice system (editorial), no, author, 93: 180, 182 (5, AJS Judicature)
    • “Must find the defendant guilty” jury instructions violate the Sixth Amendment, Dann, B, Michael, 91: 12-19 (Jul-Aug ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • The “Bush Twins?” Roberts, Alito, and the conservative agenda, Perry, Barbara A., 92: 302-311 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • “Diversity on the Bench: Is the ‘Wise Latina’ a Myth?” (focus), Andersen, Seth S., 93: 208-209 (5, AJS Judicature)
    • “Strict Scrutiny?” The content of Senate judicial confirmation hearings during the George W. Bush administration, Dancy, Logan, Nelson, Kjersten R., and Ringsmuth, Eve M., 95: 126-135 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • Absolute power (letter), Burrage, Jeanette, 80: 295 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Activism on the Indian Supreme Court, Moog, Robert, 82: 124-132 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
    • Addressing the problem of courtroom stress, Miller, Monica K. and Flores, David M., 91: 60-69 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Adjudicating allegations of child sexual abuse when custody is in dispute, Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 81: 30-34 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Adjudication to Settlement: Shading in the Gray, Kritzer, Herbert M., 70: 161-165 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Adjudicatory Processes and the Organization of Trial Courts, Kerwin, Cornelius, Henderson, Thomas, and Baar, Carl, 70: 99-107 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Afterword: If capital punishment were subject to consumer protection laws, McCord, David, 89: 304-305 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
    • An agency and 12 courts: Social Security disability cases in the U.S. courts of appeals, Haire, Susan and Lindquist, Stefanie, 80: 230-236 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • AIDS: A Judicial Perspective, Messitte, Peter J., 72: 204-209 (Dec.-Jan. ’89, AJS Judicature)
    • Amending the Constitution (letter), Robinson, Richard R., 80: 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • An America without judicial independence, White, Penny J., 80: 174-177 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Amici Curiae And The Supreme Court’s Review Of Fetal Protection Policies, Samuels, Suzanne Uttaro, 78: 236-241 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • Amici curiae during the Rehnquist years, Owens, Ryan J. and Epstein, Lee, 89: 127-132 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation, O’Connor, Karen, 66: 256-264 (Dec.-Jan. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Anastasoff v. United States: an update (focus), Braun, Jerome I., 85: 93-94 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Another Motive for Depublication (letter), Hirschfeld, Robert A., 67: 368 (Mar. ’84,
      AJS Judicature)
    • Anti-plaintiff bias in the federal appellate courts, Clermont, Kevin M. and Eisenberg, Theodore, 84: 128-134 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Appellate courts must conduct independent research of Daubert issues to discover “junk science”, Keasler, Michael E. and Cramer, Cathy, 90: 62-64 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
    • Appellate courts should resist the temptation to conduct their own independent research on scientific issues, Keller, Sharon and Cimics, Donald, 90: 64-65 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
    • Applying Daubert: how well do judges understand science and scientific method?, Dobbin, Shirley A., Gatowski, Sophia I., Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Merlino, Mara L., and Dahir, Veronica, 85: 244-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • Applying the problem-solving model outside of problem-solving courts (focus), Byrne, Francine, Farole, Donald J., Jr., Puffett, Nora, and Rempel, Michael, 89: 89 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Are Clinton’s judges “old” Democrats or “new” Democrats?, Scherer, Nancy, 84: 150-154 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Are court-appointed experts the solution to the problems of expert testimony?, Champagne, Anthony, Easterling, Danny, Shuman, Daniel W., Tomkins, Alan J., and Whitaker, Elizabeth, 84: 178-183 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Are Heavy Caseloads Changing the Nature of Appellate Justice? (query), Howard, J. Woodford, Jr., 66: 57-59 (Aug. ’82, AJS Judicature)
    • Arrogation of Power or Accountability: “Judicial Imperialism” Revisited, Wasby, Stephen L., 65: 209-219 (Oct. ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Asking the Right Questions (letter), Johns, Josephine W., 67: 264, 306 (Dec.-Jan. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Assessing the conservatism of the Rehnquist Court, Hensley, Thomas R. and Smith, Christopher E., 77: 83-89 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Attacks on judges: Why they fail, Friedman, Barry, 81: 150-155 (Jan.-Feb. ’98, AJS Judicature)
    • The authors respond (letter), Reynolds, William L. and Richman, William M., 81: 6, 40-41 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • The Balancing Act of Court Confidentiality Agreements (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 76: 280, 325 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Bargaining and accommodation on the United States Supreme Court: Insight from Justice Blackman, Corley, Pamela C., 90: 157-165 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Beyond Legislative Lobbying: Women’s Rights Groups and the Supreme Court, O’Connor, Karen and Epstein, Lee, 67: 134-143 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • A biased opinion (letter), Sage, Larry Guy, 80: 205 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • The Bill of Rights – Its Origins and Its Keepers, Moyer, Thomas J., 75: 57-61 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Brown at 50: The road that lies behind us and the challenges ahead, Clark, Hunter R., 88: 56-59 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • A Bulwark Against Arbitrariness (letter), Ervin, Spencer,, Jr., 65: 382 (Feb. ’82, AJS Judicature)
    • Burger Court Review of State Court Civil Liberties Decisions, Spaeth, Harold J., 68: 285-291 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
    • Campaign contributions, judicial decisions, and the Texas Supreme Court: Assessing the appearance of impropriety, McCall, Madhavi M. and McCall, Michael A., 90: 214-225 (Mar-Apr ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Can States Adapt the Federal Rules of Evidence for Small Case Litigation? (query), Ryerson, Paul S., 67: 421-423, 464-465 (Apr. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Carter’s Judicial Appointments: The Influence of Affirmative Action and Merit Selection on Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, Gottschall, Jon, 67: 164-173 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • The Case For Large Federal Courts of Appeals (viewpoint), Wallace, J. Clifford, 77: 288-289 (May-Jun. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • The causation issue in computer security breach cases, Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 93: 75-76 (2, AJS Judicature)
    • A cautionary note about fingerprint analysis and reliance on digital technology, Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 89: 334-338 (May-June ’06, AJS Judicature)
    • Centralized Research Staff: Is There a Monster in the Judicial Closet?, Stow, Mary Lou and Spaeth, Harold J., 75: 216-221 (Dec.-Jan. ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Challenges to the Gatekeeper: The Debate Over Federal Litigating Authority, Olson, Susan M., 68: 70-86 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • The Changing Face of America – How Will Demographic Trends Affect the Courts, Author, No, 72: 125-132 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • The changing nature of psychological expert testimony in child custody cases, Wah, Carolyn R., 86: 152-161 (Nov.-Dec. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • The changing role of the trial judge (viewpoint), Ludwig, Edmund V., 85: 216-217, 253 (Mar.-Apr. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • Chief Justice Rehnquist: “poster child” for the attitudinal model, Spaeth, Harold J., 89: 108-115 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Circuit breaker: Deciphering courts of appeals decisions using the U.S. Courts of Appeals Data Base, George, Tracey E. and Sheehan, Reginald S., 83: 240-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Classifying Opinions (letter), Rosenhouse, Michael A., 72: 76 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Clearinghouse on aging issues (brief), Richert, David, 94: 92 (sep-oct ’10, AJS Judicature)
    • The Clinton clones: Ginsburg, Breyer, and the Clinton legacy, O’Connor, Karen and Palmer, Barbara, 84: 262-273 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton’s legacy or Bork’s? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 224 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Collegiality among Supreme Court justices? An early assessment of the Roberts Court, Yalof, David A., Mello, Joseph, and Schmidt, Patrick, 95: 12-19 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • Combining Judges’ Attributes and Case Characteristics: An Alternative Approach to Explaining Supreme Court Decisionmaking, Aliotta, Jilda M., 71: 277-280 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Comparative Aspects Of Judicial Review: Issues Facing The New European States, Utter, Robert F. and Lundsgaard, David C., 77: 240-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Comparing courts using the American states, Brace, Paul and Hall, Melinda Gann, 83: 250-266 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Concurring in result without written opinion: a condemnable practice (viewpoint), Robbins, Ira P., 84: 118-119, 160-165 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Confessions of an angry judge, O’Brien, Gregory C., Jr., 87: 251-253 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Confidential Settlements and Sealed Court Records: Necessary Safeguards or Unwarranted Secrecy? (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 78: 304-311 (May-Jun. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • Confidentiality and the Courts: Preserving Judicial Discretion, Conlon, Suzanne B., 76: 304-307, 313 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Confidentiality and the Courts: Protecting the Right to Privacy, Burkholder, Evan A., 76: 311-313 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Confidentiality and the Courts: Secrecy’s Threat To Public Safety, Reed, Charles J., 76: 308-310 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Congressional responses to federal circuit court decisions, Lindquist, Stephanie A. and Yalof, David A., 85: 60-68 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Consensus In The Unanimous Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, Spaeth, Harold J., 72: 274-281 (Feb.-Mar. ’89, AJS Judicature)
    • Constitutional Problems of Juvenile Delinquency Trials, Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 78: 81-88 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Constitutional Rights Without Remedies: Judicial Review of Underinclusive Legislation, Miller, Bruce K. and Devins, Neal E., 70: 151-156 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • A Conversation Between A Judge and His Friend Concerning Whether the Judge Should Sentence A Defendant to Death, Ledewitz, Bruce, 71: 7-12 (Jun.-Jul. ’87, AJS Judicature)
    • Correction, Author, No, 77: 184, 336 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Correction (letter), Author, No, 85: 205 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • Could Jud
      ges Deliver More Justice If They Wrote Fewer Opinions? (query), Merrill, Charles M., 64: 435, 471 (May ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Court-legislative conflict in Massachusetts (focus), Miller, Mark C., 88: 97-99 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Criminal justice system Court responses to batterer program noncompliance: A national survey (focus), Labriola, Melissa, O’Sullivan, Chris, Frank, Phyllis B., and Rempel, Michael, 94: 81-84 (sep-oct ’10, AJS Judicature)
    • Crisis in the family court (focus), Glenn, Andrea, 93: 253-254 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • Criteria for Publication of Opinions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Formal Rules Versus Empirical Reality, Songer, Donald R., 73: 307-313 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • Critical Issues In The Courtroom: Exploring a Hypothetical Case, Author, No, 72: 12-22 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 79: 298-302 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
    • Curriculum promotes developmentally appropriate practice in juvenile court (brief), No, Author, 93: 260 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • The danger of exposure to the Internet (viewpoint), Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 91: 57-59 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Daubert And The Need For Judicial Scientific Literacy, Miller, Paul S., Rein, Bert W., and Bailey, Edwin O., 77: 254-260 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • David Souter’s First Term on the Supreme Court: The Impact of a New Justice, Johnson, Scott P. and Smith, Christopher E., 75: 238-243 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Debunking the myth (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 85: 171 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • Deciding What to Decide: How The Supreme Court Sets Its Agenda, Provine, D. Marie, 64: 320-333 (Feb. ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Deciding what to decide: the Judges’ Bill at 75, Harnett, Edward A., 84: 120-127 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • The decision making of Clinton’s nontraditional judicial appointees, Segal, Jennifer A., 80: 279 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Decisional Trends on the Warren and Burger Courts: Results from the Supreme Court Data Base Project, Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., 73: 103-107 (Aug.-Sep. ’89, AJS Judicature)
    • The decision-making behavior of George W. Bush’s judicial appointees: Far-right, conservative, or moderate?, Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald, 88: 20-28 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Decision-making trends of the Rehnquist Court era: Civil rights and liberties cases, Hensley, Thomas R. and Smith, Christopher E., 89: 161-167, 184-185 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Decisionmaking Under Conditions of Uncertainty (letter), Shuman, Daniel W., 67: 236-335 (Feb. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • The decline and fall of legislative history? Patterns of Supreme Court reliance in the Burger and Rehnquist eras, Brudney, James J. and Ditslear, Corey, 89: 220-229 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
    • Defining Activism (letter), Kellogg, Frederick R., 67: 317 (Feb. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Defining the Dimensions of Judicial Activism, Canon, Bradley C., 66: 236-247 (Dec.-Jan. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Departures in the study of state supreme courts (review essay), Caldeira, Gregory A., 67: 458-463 (Apr. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Determining the proper allocation of cases between federal and state courts (viewpoint), Newman, Jon O., 79: 6-7, 46 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • A diminished plenary docket: A legacy of the Rehnquist Court, O’Brien, David M., 89: 134-137 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)

    • Posted

    in

    ,

    by

    HJ Bailey

    Tags:

    , ,

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *