Panduit Standard

Panduit Standard in the United States

In Patent Damages Law

Note: for more information on patent damages law, click here.

This covers the following:

  • Acceptable substitutes jury instructions (standard for proving lost profits damages)
  • Critique and modications (standard for proving lost profits damages)
  • Demand for patent product (infringer’s name and reputation as defense, jury instruction, market expansion defense,
  • Patent owner’s capacity to meet, “submarket” defense)
  • Discovery (standard for proving lost profits damages)
  • Infringement (standard for proving lost profits damages, absence of acceptable non-infringing substitutes,
  • Infringer’s name and reputation as defense, jury instructions, doubts resolved against infringer)
  • Jury instructions (see below)
  • Standard for proving lost profits damages (see below)
  • Substitutes (acceptable substitutes)
  • Standard for proving lost profits damages

Standard for proving lost profits damages

  • absence of acceptable non-infringing, substitutes,
  • effect on conduct of infringer,
  • substitute issue,
  • definition of “legally acceptable substitute”
  • Federal circuit interpretations,
  • effect on market influences,
  • substitute issue,
  • market share evaluations,
  • patent-owner’s products as substitutes,
  • price of alleging non-infringing substitutes,
  • absence of acceptable non-infringing substitutes,
  • effect on prior settlements,
  • multiple infringers,
  • timing of availability of alleged substitute,
  • Yarway’s mini-market approach,
  • proving amount of lost profits,
  • discovery,
  • testimony of economic experts,
  • evidence presented by infringer,
  • substantiation of patent owner’s lost profits theories,
  • evidence and calculations,
  • foreign sales,
  • incremental income approach,
  • jury instruction,
  • incremental profit methodology,
  • price erosion, causation,
  • critique and modication,
  • market share evaluations,
  • modication of Panduit standard,
  • technical substitutes vs. economic substitutes,
  • discovery
  • foreign sales,
  • infringement,
  • jury instructions,
  • Market and Market Conditions
  • multifaceted machine that incorporates patented feature,
  • price erosion,
  • spare parts,
  • inclusion of unpatented items in damage award,
  • substitutes critique of standard,
  • technical substitutes vs. economic substitutes,
  • jury instructions,
  • two-supplier market theory,
  • unpatented items,
  • inclusion in damage award
  • expansion of liability for unpatented devices and spare parts,
  • incorporating patent features,
  • market value rule
  • multifaceted machine that incorporates patented feature,
  • sale of unpatented item with patented item: collateral, spare parts,

Jury instructions

  • acceptable substitutes
  • niche market
  • relevant customer
  • incremental amount of profit,
  • income approach,
  • capacity,
  • computation of lost profits,
  • jury instructions demand,
  • doubts resolved against infringer,
  • market
  • niche market

Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *