International Security Part 22 in the United States

266
A Vicious Storm in a Teacup: The Action by the United Nations Security Council to Narrow the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court
Roberto Lavalle
Criminal Law Forum
Volume 14, Number 2, June 2003    p.195-220 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

267
Transnational Criminal Networks and International Security
Melvyn Levitsky
Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce
Volume 30, Number 2, Summer 2003    p.227 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

268
Conference report: “In search of security: an international conference on policing & security”. February 19–22, 2003 in Montréal, Québec Canada
Mark Perry
Computer Law and Security Review
Volume 19, Issue 3, May 2003    p.242-243 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

269
The Limits of the Security Council’s Authority: The Iraq and the International Criminal Court Cases
Gernot Biehler
Dublin University Law Journal
Volume 25, 2003    p.189 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

270
Interplay Between National Security and International Law in the 21st Century: Conflict or Cooperation? How Can We Really Protect International Security?
Curtis F. Doebbler
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 9, Number 2, Spring 2003    p.399 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

271
The International Criminal Court, National Security and Compliance with International Law
James C. Kraska
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 9, Number 2, Spring 2003    p.407 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

272
The Olde Order Crumbleth: HIV-Pestilence As a Security Issue & NEW Thinking About Core Concepts in International Affairs
J.M. Spectar
Indiana International & Comparative Law Review
Volume 13, Number 2, 2003    p.481 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

273
A RETURN TO LOCKERBIE AND THE MONTREAL CONVENTION IN THE WAKE OF THE SEPTEMBER 11TH TERRORIST ATTACKS: RAMIFICATIONS OF PAST SECURITY COUNCIL AND INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ACTION
Jonathan A. Frank
Denver Journal of International Law and Policy
Volume 30, Number 4, Summer/Fall 2002    p.532 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

274
International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO?
Dapo Akande & Sope Williams
Virginia Journal of International Law
Volume 43, Number 2, Winter 2003    p.365 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

275
Re-configuring Non-refoulement? The Suresh Decision, ‘Security Relativism’, and the International Human Rights Imperative
Obiora Chinedu Okafor and Pius Lekwuwa Okoronkwo
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 15, Number 1, January 2003    p.30-67 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

276
ENFORCING ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS BY MILITARY FORCE: IRAQ AND THE 800-POUND GORILLA
Davis Brown
Hastings International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 26, Number 2, Winter 2003    p.159 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
Despite Iraq’s complete disdain for international law, the community of States, acting in accordance with international law, had allowed the Ba’ath regime to remain in power. Iraq therefore enjoyed the benefits of the principles of sovereign equality, non-interference with internal affairs, and, for the most part, non-use of force, without shouldering any of the responsibilities that come with the privilege of recognition as a State. This article begins with a presentation of a new approach to jus ad bellum which takes just war theory to the next level, where force is used as a remedy to a grave injury caused by the breach of an international obligation. The article applies an injury-remedy approach to two prior case studies involving Iraq’s noncompliance with obligations not to develop weapons of mass destruction. The author concludes with a discussion of the burning question of 2002-03: the lawfulness of the recently concluded Operation Iraqi Freedom, in which the United States and a small coalition used force without Security Council authorization to effect a regime change in Iraq.

277
Powers of Detention of Suspected International Terrorists under the United Kingdom Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: dismantling cornerstones of a civil society
Jonathan Black-Branch
European Law Review
Volume 27, Human Rights Survey 2002    p.HR/19 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW