International Criminal Court Part 29 in the United States

547
JUSTICE FOR SOME? U.S. EFFORTS UNDER ARTICLE 98 TO ESCAPE THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Cosmos Eubany
Hastings International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 27, Number 1, Fall 2003    p.103 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
In April 2002, ten countries ratified the Rome Statute and deposited their instruments with the United Nations. These actions brought the International Criminal Court into force with over sixty ratifications. A month later, the United States declared that it no longer intended to pursue ratification of the treaty and asked to remove its signature from the statute. The United States then launched a campaign to ensure that its nationals would not fall within the jurisdiction of the Court. To ensure that the ICC does not gain jurisdiction over its nationals under any circumstance, the United States is currently seeking “non-surrender” bilateral agreements with other states. This note discusses how U.S. bilateral agreements will effect the legitimacy of the ICC by examining the U.S. position on the ICC and then tracing U.S. efforts to secure immunity from the Court, focusing on the U.S. interpretation of Article 98, Paragraph 2.

548
The International Criminal Court: Better than Nuremberg?
Tonya J. Boller
Indiana International & Comparative Law Review
Volume 14, Number 1, 2003    p.279 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

549
The International Criminal Court and the Applicability of International Jurisdiction under Islamic Law
Ahmad E. Nassar
Chicago Journal of International Law
Volume 4, Number 2, Fall 2003    p.587 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

550
Globalizing Criminal Justice: Challenges for the International Criminal Court
Vladimir Law Journal / Law Reviewhilovsky
Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Volume 9, Number 3, July-September 2003    p.291 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

551
The International Criminal Court in the System of States and International Organizations
KENNETH S. GALLANT
Leiden Journal of International Law
Volume 16, Number 3, September 2003    p.553-591 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

552
Civil society and the International Criminal Court
Johan van der Vyver
Journal of Human Rights
Volume 2, Number 3, 2003    p.425-439 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

553
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Should the United States Sign on the Dotted Line?
Todd Prichard
Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems
Volume 13, Number 2, Fall 2003    p.727 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

554
From the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the International Criminal Court: Expanding the Definition of Genocide To Include Rape
Alexandra A. Miller
Penn State Law Review
Volume 108, Number 1, Summer 2003    p.349 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

555
The Surrender of War Criminals to the International Criminal Court
Göran Sluiter
Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review
Volume 25, Number 3, Summer 2003    p.605 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

556
International Criminal Law: A Bittersweet Year for Supporters and Critics of the International Criminal Court
Robert T. Alter
International Lawyer
Volume 37, Number 2, Summer 2003    p.541 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

557
Some Critical Remarks on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Yang Iijun
Chinese Journal of International Law
Volume 2, Number 2, 2003    p.599-622 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

558
An Introduction to the International Criminal Court – William A.Schabas
Simon N. M. Young
Hong Kong Law Journal
Volume 33, Part 2, 2003    p.508 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

559
Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court
Darryl Robinson
European Journal of International law
Volume 14, Number 3, June 2003    p.481-505 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW