Decarceration

Decarceration in the United States

Decarceration Background

U.S. Crime and Prison Incarceration Changes

Changes in the U.S. Correctional Populations, Population, Crime, and Arrests, 1980–2014, by indicator:

  • Prisons : 319,600 (in 1980); 1,561,500 (in 2014); which results in a change of 389% in the period 1980-2014
  • Probation : 1,118,000 (in 1980); 3,864,100 (in 2014); which results in a change of 246% in the period 1980-2014
  • Parole : 220,500 (in 1980); 856,900 (in 2014); which results in a change of 289% in the period 1980-2014
  • Jails : 182,250 (in 1980); 744,600 (in 2014); which results in a change of 309% in the period 1980-2014
  • Total Correctional System : 1,840,350 (in 1980); 7,027,100 (in 2014); which results in a change of 282% in the period 1980-2014
  • U.S. Population : 227 million (in 1980); 319 million (in 2014); which results in a change of 41% in the period 1980-2014
  • Reported Index Crimes : 13.4 million (in 1980); 9.4 million (in 2014); which results in a change of −30% in the period 1980-2014
  • Arrests : 13.7 million (in 1980); 11.2 million (in 2014); which results in a change of −18% in the period 1980-2014

Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Census, and Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Correctional Populations and Admissions in the United States

Correctional Populations and Admissions in 2014, by Correctional System:

  • Prisons : 1,561,500 (population); 631,310 (admissions)
  • Probation : 3,864,100 (population); 2,067,100 (admissions)
  • Parole : 856,900 (population); 546,300 (admissions)
  • Jails : 744,600 (population); 11,383,424 (admissions)
  • Total : 7,027,100 (population); 14,628,134 (admissions)
  • Assume 25% Duplication : 10,971,100 (admissions)
  • Adult Population : 245.3 million (population); 245.3 million (admissions)
  • Rate per 100 Adults : 2.9 (population); 4.5 (admissions)

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics website data collections and U.S. Census.

Changes in State Prisoner Population Trends

Trends in Court Sentencing

State Felony Court Sentencing Trends 1992 versus 2006, by indicator:

  • State Prison Population : 802,241 (in 1992); 1,132,244,311 (in 2006); resulting in a 55% change
  • Reported Crime : 14,438,191 (in 1992); 10,319,386 (in 2006); resulting in a −29% change
  • Arrests : 7,316,610 (in 1992); 8,526,688 (in 2006); resulting in a 17% change
  • Felony Convictions : 893,630 (in 1992); 1,132,290 (in 2006); resulting in a 21% change
  • Drug Cases : 280,232 (in 1992); 377,860 (in 2006); resulting in a 29% change
  • % Convicted : 68% (in 1992); 68% (in 2006); resulting in a 0% change
  • Disposition Rates : (in 1992); (in 2006); resulting in a change
  • Prison : 44% (in 1992); 41% (in 2006); resulting in a −3% change
  • Jail : 26% (in 1992); 28% (in 2006); resulting in a 2% change
  • Probation : 30% (in 1992); 28% (in 2006); resulting in a −2% change
  • Other : 2% (in 1992); 4% (in 2006); resulting in a 2% change

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics website data collections.

Trends in State Prison Length of Stay

Average State Prison Maximum Sentence Length (in months) for New Court Admissions by Crime Category 1993 versus 2009, by primary offense:

  • Violent : 107 months in 1993; 97 months in 209; producing a difference of −10 months in the period
  • Homicide : 188 months in 1993; 205 months in 209; producing a difference of 17 months in the period
  • Kidnap : 133 months in 1993; 108 months in 209; producing a difference of −25 months in the period
  • Rape : 141 months in 1993; 158 months in 209; producing a difference of 17 months in the period
  • Robbery : 102 months in 1993; 96 months in 209; producing a difference of −6 months in the period
  • Assault : 76 months in 1993; 65 months in 209; producing a difference of −11 months in the period
  • Property : 58 months in 1993; 50 months in 209; producing a difference of −8 months in the period
  • Burglary : 69 months in 1993; 59 months in 209; producing a difference of −10 months in the period
  • Larceny : 46 months in 1993; 42 months in 209; producing a difference of −4 months in the period
  • Motor vehicle theft : 44 months in 1993; 37 months in 209; producing a difference of −7 months in the period
  • Arson : 89 months in 1993; 81 months in 209; producing a difference of −8 months in the period
  • Fraud : 52 months in 1993; 44 months in 209; producing a difference of −8 months in the period
  • Stolen property : 52 months in 1993; 44 months in 209; producing a difference of −8 months in the period
  • Other property : 48 months in 1993; 44 months in 209; producing a difference of −4 months in the period
  • Drugs : 62 months in 1993; 57 months in 209; producing a difference of −5 months in the period
  • Possession : 60 months in 1993; 48 months in 209; producing a difference of -12 months in the period
  • Trafficking : 65 months in 1993; 67 months in 209; producing a difference of 2 months in the period
  • Other/unspecified drug : 54 months in 1993; 51 months in 209; producing a difference of −3 months in the period
  • Other Crimes : 89 months in 1993; 50 months in 209; producing a difference of −39 months in the period
  • Weapons : 52 months in 1993; 55 months in 209; producing a difference of 3 months in the period
  • Driving while intoxicated : 52 months in 1993; 44 months in 209; producing a difference of −8 months in the period
  • Other public-order : 48 months in 1993; 50 months in 209; producing a difference of 2 months in the period

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Corrections Reporting Program, 1993 and 2009

Prison Length of Stay and Prisoner Recidivism Rates

Three-Year Follow-Up Rate of Rearrest of State Prisoners Released in 1994 by Time Served in Prison, by time served:

  • 6 Months or Less: 66.0% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 7–12 months: 64.8% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 13–18 months: 64.2% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 19–24 months: 65.4% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 25–30 months: 68.3% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 31–36 months: 62.6% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 37–60 months: 63.2% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)
  • 61 months or more: 54.0% (3-Year Rearrest Rates)

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison Statistics.

Resources

Further Reading

  • Andrews, D., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1987). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404.
  • Currie, E. (2013). Crime and punishment in America. New York: Picador.
  • Gendreau, P., & Ross, P. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3), 349–407.
  • Liedka, R. V., Piehl, A. M., & Useem, B. (2006). The crime control effect of incarceration: Does scale matter? Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 245–276.
  • Nagin, D. (2010). Imprisonment and crime control: Building evidence-based policy. In R. Rosenfeld, K. Quiner, & C. Garcia (Eds.), Contemporary issues in criminological theory and research: The role of social institutions (pp. 309–316). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Petersilia, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2014). Liberal is not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, 2, 1–43.
  • Sundt, J., Salisbury, E. J., & Harmon, M. G. (2016). Is downsizing prisons dangerous? The effect of California’s Realignment Act on public safety. Criminology and Public Safety, 15, 315–341.
  • Tonry, M. (2010). Less imprisonment less crime: A reply to Nagin. In R. Rosenfeld, K. Quiner, & C. Garcia (Eds.), Contemporary issues in criminological theory and research: The role of social institutions (pp. 317–330). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring the causes and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage.