Case Evaluation

Case Evaluation in the United States

Work-up and Evaluation of the Case (in Disability Claims)

Contents

  • Distinguishing the types of disability law
  • Insured status computation
  • Obtaining medical data and information
  • Obtaining physician records
  • Getting proper evaluation standard from physician
  • Obtaining hospital records
  • Obtaining other evidence of disability
  • Attorney actions
  • Legal assistant/legal secretary actions
  • Evaluation of pain
  • Obtaining employment or social security records where necessary
  • Obtaining and reviewing social security issues
  • Having client evaluated where necessary
  • Administratively initiated evaluation of the claimant
  • Checking to see if client has fled other litigation
  • Contacting lay witnesses regarding disability

Case Comments

A case comment is a brief student-written article, usually around 10 pages long, explaining and offering commentary on a recent court decision. Case comments traditionally have served three functions:

  • Alerting readers to a recent decision,
  • Offering a scholarly assessment of the decision soon after the decision is out, hopefully before academics and appeals courts have had time to digest it, and
  • Helping editors improve their writing skills and generating a writing sample for future job applications. (…)

In general, the quality of legal analysis generated by the blawgs is notably higher than that of case comments; practitioners and law professors have more expertise and experience than 2Ls, and the back-and-forth debate online generally tightens loose thinking pretty quickly. In contrast, student case comments are usually short on perspective and long on political agendas; the majority seem to fall into the “I’m liberal and want to bash the Rehnquist Court” mold, or the “I’m conservative and this Reinhardt decision is nuts” mold.

By the time case comments come out, usually about a year after the decision, it is too little, too late. Litigants, judicial clerks, and anyone else involved in the case can read the output of the blawgs online and take away whatever lessons they wish from the commentary; few are going to go hunting through westlaw for student comments a year or two later. (…)

Perhaps the third function of case comments is enough to keep case comments alive, at least for a decade or two. But my prediction is that journals will (…) focus more on scholarship surveys (where student reviews could be very helpful) and broader note topics.

Author: Orin Kerr

Obtaining and Reviewing Social Security Case Evaluation (in Disability Claims)

Some information about Obtaining and Reviewing Social Security case evaluation in this context.

Evaluating the Case For the Hearing (in Disability Claims)

Some information about Evaluating the Case For the Hearing in this context.


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

5 responses to “Case Evaluation”

  1. International Avatar
    International

    John Steele

    Several prior developments had already rendered case comments nearly useless, imho. Even before the internet mushroomed, hard copy, topical reporters and advance sheets were the most common way practitioners learned of new developments; legal newspapers started publishing all new reported cases, with blurbs, for each jurisdiction; the relatively recent CLE requirements increased the number of “new developments” talks we attend; and email listservs for legal specialists became a major source of information for the experts in any field.

    Practitioners are drowning in information and early analysis of new cases. Practitioners get bombarded with daily emails, and e-copies of advance sheets. Many of the topical reporters have instant analyses from leading experts who want to maintain their reputations and who view their contributions as promotional practice-builders.

    Speaking for myself, I can’t imagine that case comments have served either of the first two functions for many years now, but I’d be interested to hear otherwise. I wouldn’t be surprised if in the protected market of law reviews the third function lingers on for a long time.

  2. International Avatar
    International

    As to case notes, the web provides a real opportunity to make them relevant again. Instead of a year’s lag between issuance of the opinion and publication of the note, the web ought to be able to cut down the gap to a week or two. Why can’t the editors scan the blawgs and the Court of Appeals’ web sites for noteworthy new opinions, and assign casenotes to staffers on a rolling basis, posting them to the review’s web site as soon as they’re ready? I agree that blawgs (and daily opinion sheets) can do a good job, but a well-written and researched note can often provide a bit more context.

  3. International Avatar
    International

    I think this poses an interesting issue. I think it’s largely dependent upon the audience for the case note or blog.

    If, as has been suggested, the case note is for a judge or an attorney who may be analyzing a similar issue, a published law review case note provides two benefits that a blog does not:

    1) the “authority,” as it may be, that it was published and vetted in a law review journal–in the scale of persuasive precedent, a vetted law review article seems presumably more highly ranked than a blog; and

    2) a bibliography of relevant sources–at at least some law reviews, a case comment is not considered relevant for the analysis contained therein, it is more relevant for the bibliography of relevant sources that the original decision may have missed

    Of course the above are dependent upon your view of the purpose of a case note. If the purpose is to foster discussion of the case (which it must be in some small fashion), a blog entry is decidedly superior. If, however, it is to foster discussion of a case in an academically vetted environment with hopefully reliable sources, a law review case note is drastically different than a blog discussion.

    In either case, I am sure we will one day see a judicial decision cite a “case comment” published in a blog. Is such a blog entry, fully cited and fully commented upon by external readers, better or worse than a published, cite checked case note?

    I would say that hopefully the cite checked case note is of better quality, but the blog sure does beat the publication time.

  4. International Avatar
    International

    Case comments tend to be around 3000-4000 words, several times longer than the typical blog post, and involve a good deal more research. Thus, good case comments still fulfill the author of the section in this entry’s function 2) in a way that few blog posts do. Bad case comments, like bad student notes and bad law review articles, are bad and just get ignored.

  5. International Avatar
    International

    I am doing more and more legal research on the Internet before I look for Lexis/Westlaw/book answers.

    That said, the most notable difference I can imagine is that comments will be more informed. Law students will be able to visit great legal minds and interact before writing.

    I believe this will be invaluable to student comments and make them a more, not less, valuable commodity. In the future, part of the standard preparation for comments will include visiting the blogs of professors and practioners to see what the legal community is buzzing about.

    In the end, the comment may be more of an amalgamation of thought, but certainly superior to the useless garbage that is usually produced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *