Attendance in the United States
Attendance in relation to Immigration Courts
(information based on the DoJ Manual) Immigration Court hearings proceed promptly on the date and time that the hearing is scheduled. Any delay in the respondent’s appearance at a master calendar or individual calendar hearing may result in the hearing being held “in absentia” (in the respondent’s absence). See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) 8 C.F.R. § 1003.26. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) also Master Calendar Hearing, Individual Calendar Hearing, and In Absentia Hearing. Any delay in the appearance of either party’s representative without satisfactory notice and explanation to the Immigration Court may, in the discretion of the Immigration Judge, result in the hearing being held in the representative’s absence. Respondents, representatives, and witnesses should be mindful that they may encounter delays in going through the mandatory security screening at the Immigration Court, and should plan accordingly. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) 4.14 (Access to Court). Regardless of such delays, all individuals must pass through the security screening and be present in the courtroom at the time the hearing is scheduled. For hearings at detention facilities, parties should be mindful of any additional security restrictions at the facility. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) Access to Court. Individuals attending such a hearing must always be present at the time the hearing is scheduled, regardless of any such additional security restrictions.
Attendance in relation to Immigration Courts
(information based on the DoJ Manual) Immigration Court hearings proceed promptly on the date and time that the hearing is scheduled. Any delay in the respondent’s appearance at a master calendar or individual calendar hearing may result in the hearing being held “in absentia” (in the respondent’s absence). See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) 8 C.F.R. § 1003.26. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) also Master Calendar Hearing, Individual Calendar Hearing, and In Absentia Hearing. Any delay in the appearance of either party’s representative without satisfactory notice and explanation to the Immigration Court may, in the discretion of the Immigration Judge, result in the hearing being held in the representative’s absence. Respondents, representatives, and witnesses should be mindful that they may encounter delays in going through the mandatory security screening at the Immigration Court, and should plan accordingly. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) 4.14 (Access to Court). Regardless of such delays, all individuals must pass through the security screening and be present in the courtroom at the time the hearing is scheduled. For hearings at detention facilities, parties should be mindful of any additional security restrictions at the facility. See (in this American law platform, in relation to immigration courts and judges) Access to Court. Individuals attending such a hearing must always be present at the time the hearing is scheduled, regardless of any such additional security restrictions.