Third Parties in United States

Third Parties

Third Parties Definition in Contract Law

A term used to include all persons who are not parties to the contract, agreement, or instrument of writing by which their interest in the thing conveyed is sought to be affected. (…). But it is difficult to give a very definite idea of “third persons;” for sometimes those who are not parties to the contract, but who represent the rights of the original parties, as executors, are not to be considered third persons.  (1)

Third Political Parties and Independent Candidates

The United States is often thought of as a two-party system. In practical effect it is: either a Democrat or a Republican has occupied the White House every year since 1852. At the same time, however, the country has produced a plethora of third and minor parties over the years. For example, 58 parties were represented on at least one state ballot during the 1992 presidential elections. Among these were such obscure parties as the Apathy, the Looking Back, the New Mexico Prohibition, the Tish Independent Citizens and the Vermont Taxpayers.

In general, third parties organize around a single issue or set of issues. They tend to fare best when they have a charismatic leader. With the presidency out of reach, most seek a platform to publicize their political and social concerns.

Theodore Roosevelt

The most successful third party candidate of this century was a Republican, Theodore Roosevelt, the former president. His Progressive or Bull Moose Party won 27.4 percent of the vote in the 1912 election. The progressive wing of the Republican Party, having grown disenchanted with President William Howard Taft, whom Roosevelt had hand-picked as his successor, urged Roosevelt to seek the party nomination in 1912. This he did, defeating Taft in a number of primaries. Taft controlled the party machinery, however, and secured the nomination.

Roosevelt’s supporters then broke away and formed the Progressive Party. Declaring himself as fit as a bull moose (hence the party’s popular name), Roosevelt campaigned on a platform of regulating “big business,” women’s suffrage, a graduated income tax, the Panama Canal and conservation. His effort was sufficient to defeat Taft. By splitting the Republican vote, however, he helped ensure the election of the Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

Socialists

The Socialist Party also reached its high point in 1912, attaining 6 percent of the popular vote. Perennial candidate Eugene Debs won over 900,000 votes that year, advocating collective ownership of the transportation and communication industries, shorter working hours and public works projects to spur employment. Jailed for sedition during World War I, Debs campaigned from his cell in 1920, but neither he nor his successors ever duplicated the results of 1912.

Robert LaFollette

Another Progressive was Senator Robert LaFollette, who won 16.6 percent of the vote in the 1924 election. Long a champion of farmers and industrial workers, and an ardent foe of big business, LaFollette was a prime mover in the recreation of the Progressive movement following World War I. Backed by the farm and labor vote, as well as by Socialists and remnants of Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party, LaFollette ran on a platform of nationalizing railroads and the country’s natural resources. He also strongly supported increased taxation on the wealthy and the right of collective bargaining. Despite a strong showing in certain regions, he carried only his home state of Wisconsin.

Henry Wallace

The Progressive Party reinvented itself in 1948 with the nomination of Henry Wallace, a former secretary of agriculture and vice president under Franklin Roosevelt. Briefly Harry Truman’s secretary of commerce, he was fired for opposing Truman’s firm stand against the Soviet Union. Wallace’s 1948 platform opposed the Cold War, the Marshall Plan and big business. He also campaigned to end discrimination against blacks and women, backed a minimum wage and called for the elimination of the House Committee on Un-American Activities. His failure to repudiate the U.S. Communist Party, which had endorsed him, undermined his popularity and he wound up with just over 2.4 percent of the popular vote.

Dixiecrats

The same percentage was attained by the States Rights or Dixiecrat Party, led by South Carolina governor Strom Thurmond. Like the Progressives, the Dixiecrats broke away from the Democrats in 1948. Their opposition, however, stemmed not from Truman’s Cold War policies, but his civil rights platform. Although defined in terms of “states rights,” the party’s main goal was continuing racial segregation and the “Jim Crow” laws which sustained it.
George Wallace

The racial and social upheavals of the 1960s helped bring George Wallace, another segregationist Southern governor, to national attention. Wallace built a following through his colorful attacks against civil rights, liberals and the federal government. Founding the American Independent Party in 1968, he ran his campaign from the statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama, winning 13.5 percent of the overall presidential vote.

H. Ross Perot

Every third party seeks to capitalize on popular dissatisfaction with the major parties and the federal government. At few times in recent history, however, has this sentiment been as strong as it was during the 1992 election. A hugely wealthy Texas businessman, Perot possessed a knack for getting his message of economic common sense and fiscal responsibility across to a wide spectrum of American people.

Lampooning the nation’s leaders and reducing his economic message to easily understood formulae, Perot found little difficulty gaining media attention. His campaign organization, United We Stand, was staffed primarily by volunteers and backed by his personal fortune. Far from resenting his wealth, many admired Perot’s business success and the freedom it brought him from soliciting campaign funds from special interests.

Perot withdrew from the race in July. Re-entering it a month before the election, he won over 19 million votes, by far the largest number ever tallied by a third party candidate and second only to Roosevelt’s 1912 showing as a percentage of the total. (1)

Third Parties in Government Law

Rights and Remedies of Third Parties in relation to Local Government Regulatory Functions

Find out in this American legal Encyclopedia the information on Rights and Remedies of Third Parties in relation to Local Government Regulatory Power and Function (and in the context of local government law).

Resouces

See Also

• Local Goverment Regulation
• Local Law Regulation
• Local Government Power

Third Parties (Duties )

This section introduces, discusses and describes the basics of third parties. Then, cross references and a brief overview about Duties is provided. Finally, the subject of Agency Relationships in relation with third parties is examined. Note that a list of cross references, bibliography and other resources appears at the end of this entry.

Third Parties (Effects of Discharge)

This section introduces, discusses and describes the basics of third parties. Then, cross references and a brief overview about Effects of Discharge is provided. Finally, the subject of Discharges in relation with third parties is examined. Note that a list of cross references, bibliography and other resources appears at the end of this entry.

Third Parties (Liabilities)

This section introduces, discusses and describes the basics of third parties. Then, cross references and a brief overview about Liabilities is provided. Finally, the subject of Agency Relationships in relation with third parties is examined. Note that a list of cross references, bibliography and other resources appears at the end of this entry.

Resources

Notes and References

1. This definition of Third Parties is based on The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary
2. ”An Outline of American History”(1994), a publication of the United States Information Agency (USIA). Editor: Howard Cincotta