Social Science

Social Science in United States

Social Science and Courts

Resources

Further Reading

  • The challenges of judicial elections research (editorial), Author, No, 94: 204, 207 (Mar.-Apr. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Circuit breaker: Deciphering courts of appeals decisions using the U.S. Courts of Appeals Data Base, George, Tracey E. and Sheehan, Reginald S., 83: 240-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Comparative Judicial Databases, Cross, Frank B., 83: 248-249 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Comparing courts using the American states, Brace, Paul and Hall, Melinda Gann, 83: 250-266 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The Empirical Turn In Legal Education (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 312, 351 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Exploring judicial behaviors in the laboratories of democracy, Wolff, Michael A., 83: 267-269 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Foreword, Stewart, James K., 72: 6 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Introduction: Social science, the courts, and the law (introduction), Epstein, Lee, 83: 224-227 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Department launches Science Advisory Board (brief), Harris, Bonnie, 95: 141 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • The limits of judicial selection research (letter), Andersen, William R., 94: 206 (Mar.-Apr. ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Peering behind the velvet curtain: Lessons from a year inside the federal courts, Gould, Jon B., 92: 65-69 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • Presiding in Criminal Court: An Introduction (introduction), Morris, Norval and Tonry, Michael, 72: 7-11 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • The problems of applying Daubert to psychological syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia I., and Dobbin, Shirley A., 79: 10-16 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Scientific Jury Selection: What Social Scientists Know and Do Not Know, Diamond, Shari Seidman, 73: 178-183 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Social science and public policy (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 83: 220 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Content Analysis: Possibilities and Limits for Qualitative Data), Gates, John B., 73: 202-203 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Further Reflections on Working in the Papers of Supreme Court Justices), Ulmer, S. Sidney, 73: 193-196 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Interviewing Supreme Court Personnel), Perry, H.W.,, Jr., 73: 199-200 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Interviewing Trial Judges), Heumann, Milton, 73: 200-202 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Interviewing U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Interest Group Attorneys), Epstein, Lee, 73: 196-198 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Introduction) (introduction), Johnson, Charles A., 73: 192-193 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Data Base: Providing new insights into the Court, Spaeth, Harold J. and Segal, Jeffrey A., 83: 228-235 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Why should lawyers care about institutional data on courts?, Stearns, Maxwell L., 83: 236-239, 276-277 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)

Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *