Medicare Revision

Medicare Revision in the United States

Medicare and Medicaid Medicare Major Revision to Medicare

Introduction to Medicare Revision

About 40.6 million people were enrolled in Medicare in 2003 when Medicare underwent the most extensive revision since the program was enacted in 1965. New legislation reestablished prescription drug coverage and for the first time opened Medicare to competition from private health insurers. In addition, the bill increased federal payments to doctors and hospitals, especially in rural areas, and gave subsidies to employers who provide health benefits for retirees. For the first time Medicare discarded the principle of equal fees for services by requiring wealthier recipients to pay more while some low-income recipients pay no premiums or deductibles.

Under the new law, Medicare recipients can opt to receive prescription drug coverage, which is phased in during two stages. In the first stage, from the spring of 2004 to the beginning of 2006, Medicare recipients can purchase a Medicare-approved discount card for a fee of $30 and receive discounts ranging from 10 to 25 percent off prescription drugs. Seniors with incomes less than $12,124 per year would receive a subsidy of $600 in 2004 and 2005 to pay for prescription medicines. In the second stage, beginning in 2006, the full drug benefit becomes effective. To receive it, Medicare recipients must choose between two private health plans: either a private health plan in their area that offers prescription drug coverage through Medicare, or a private insurance plan that also covers hospital costs and doctors’ visits, such as a preferred provider organization (PPO) or health maintenance organization (HMO). See also Managed Health Care.

Under the full benefit in 2006, recipients pay an average monthly premium of $35 and an annual deductible of $250. Medicare then pays 75 percent of prescription drug costs up to $2,250. Thereafter, a gap in the coverage, known as a doughnut, requires each beneficiary to pay up to $3,600 in out-of-pocket expenses until coverage again kicks in. Medicare then pays 95 percent of prescription drug costs for the remainder of the year. For individual seniors with an income less than $12,124 a year or married couples with income less than $16,363, both with liquid assets of less than $6,000, the premium and the deductible would be waived and there would be no gap in coverage.” (1)

Resources

Notes and References

Guide to Medicare Revision

 

Medicare and Medicaid Medicare Controversy Over Revision

Introduction to Medicare Revision

The new legislation was controversial, however, and narrowly passed both the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate before being signed into law by President George W. Bush. The Senate passed the bill 54-44, largely along partisan lines with 42 Republicans, 11 Democrats, and 1 independent in favor, while 35 Democrats and 9 Republicans opposed the bill. The House approved the measure by a vote of 220 to 215. Some Democratic congressional leaders vowed to overhaul the bill in subsequent legislation.

The new provisions were controversial for a number of reasons. Critics argued that the law opened the way for the privatization of Medicare. They objected in particular to a provision that prohibits Medicare from negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to lower drug prices, arguing that this loss of purchasing power and the increased demand for prescription drugs resulting from the new coverage will likely drive up drug prices. Home health-care services were also expected to be negatively affected because the bill cut Medicare reimbursement for these services by an estimated $6.5 billion.

Supporters of the bill, including the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), the largest organization of older Americans, said the legislation provided badly needed drug coverage to millions of Americans, particularly an estimated 14 million low-income seniors. Supporters also cited $70 billion in tax-free subsidies from 2006 to 2016 for employers who continue providing drug benefits to retirees. Tax benefits would also accrue, supporters said, to people aged 64 and younger with high-deductible health insurance policies-$1,000 a year for individuals and $2,000 a year for couples-who would be able to establish tax-free Health Savings Accounts to help them pay for medical expenses in their retirement years. Supporters of the bill countered the claim that privatizing some Medicare functions would harm the program, arguing instead that it would inject competition and market forces to make health care for the elderly more efficient.” (1)

Resources

Notes and References

Guide to Medicare Revision


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *