Law and Science in United States

Law and Science

Resources

Further Reading

• AJS to study eyewitness identification procedures (brief), Eckley, Timothy S., 91: 206-207 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
• Another “view” of fingerprint evidence, Cherry, Michael, Imwinkelreid, Edward J., and Schenk, Manfred, 94: 306-308 (may-june ’11, AJS Judicature)
• Appellate courts must conduct independent research of Daubert issues to discover “junk science”, Keasler, Michael E. and Cramer, Cathy, 90: 62-64 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Appellate courts should resist the temptation to conduct their own independent research on scientific issues, Keller, Sharon and Cimics, Donald, 90: 64-65 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Applying Daubert: how well do judges understand science and scientific method?, Dobbin, Shirley A., Gatowski, Sophia I., Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Merlino, Mara L., and Dahir, Veronica, 85: 244-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• Can jury trial innovations improve juror understanding of DNA evidence?, Dann, B, Michael, Hans, Valerie P., and Kaye, David H., 90: 152-156 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
• Causes and consequences of wrongful convictions: an essay review (review essay), Bedau, Hugo Adam, 86: 115-119 (Sept.-Oct. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• The changing nature of psychological expert testimony in child custody cases, Wah, Carolyn R., 86: 152-161 (Nov.-Dec. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• Cocaine sentencing and bad chemistry, Zedeck, Morris S., 84: 86-89 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Complex scientific evidence and the jury, Myers, Robert D., Reinstein, Ronald S., and Griller, Gordon M., 83: 150-156 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• DOJ interactive training tool on principles of forensic DNA (brief), Eckley, Timothy S., 89: 350-1 (May-June ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Educating judges for adjudication of new life technologies, Zweig, Franklin M. and Cowdrey, Diane E., 83: 157-161 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• The failure of forensic science reform in Arizona (viewpoint), Hammond, Larry A., 93: 227-230 (6, AJS Judicature)
• The failure of forensic science reform in Arizona (viewpoint), Hammond, Larry A., 93: 227-230 (6, AJS Judicature)
• Fallibility of automated biometric recognition technologies (brief), Richert, David, 94: 141 (Nov-Dec ’10, AJS Judicature)
• From crime scene to courtroom: integrating DNA technology into the criminal justice system, Asplen, Christopher H., 83: 144-149 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Genes and behavior: A complex relationship, McInerney, Joseph D., 83: 112-115 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Genes and Justice: Foreword, Abrahamson, Shirley S., 83: 102 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Genes and Justice: Introduction (introduction), Casey, Denise K., 83: 103-104 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Genes, dreams, and reality: the promises and risks of the new genetics, Casey, Denise K., 83: 105-111 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Hope, fear, and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology, Gold, Richard E., 83: 132-138 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• The Human Genome Project and the courts: gene therapy and beyond, Mehlman, Maxwell J., 83: 124-130 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• The impact of behavioral genetics on the law and the courts, Rothstein, Mark A., 83: 116-123 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Independent research on scientific issues by judges must be carefully weighed and considered, Marlow, George D., 90: 66-67 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Judges and epidemiological evidence (focus), Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Dobbin, Shirley A., Gatowski, Sophia I., Dahir, Veronica, and Merlino, Mara L., 87: 38-39 (July-Aug. ’03, AJS Judicature)
• Keeping the gate: the evolving role of the judiciary in admitting scientific evidence, Walsh, Joseph T., 83: 140-143 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• The lack of statistics and distortion can weaken fingerprint accuracy (focus), Cherry, Michael, Imwinkelried, Edward, and Schenk, Manfred, 93: 254-255 (6, AJS Judicature)
• The legal system’s use of epidemiology, Bryant, Arthur H. and Reinert, Alexander A., 87: 12-21 (July-Aug. ’03, AJS Judicature)
• The legal system’s use of epidemiology: Some clarification, Korzeniewski, Steven James, 88: 137-139, 144 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• Online science courses for judges (brief), Richert, David, 94: 313 (sep-oct ’10, AJS Judicature)
• The past and future of forensic science and the courts,, Saks, Michael J., 93: 94-101 (3, AJS Judicature)
• Preventing wrongful convictions (brief), Sullivan, Thomas P., 86: 106-109, 120 (Sept.-Oct. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• The prosecutorial mandate: see that justice is done, Earle, Ronald and Case, Carl Bryan, Jr., 86: 69-73 (July-Aug. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• Regional DNA Academy graduates first class (brief), Eckley, Timothy S., 89: 235 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Safeguarding human genetic privacy (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 86: 224 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
• Science education for judges: What, where, and by whom? (focus), Merlino, Mara L., Dillehay, Ronald C., Dahir, Veronica, and Maxwell, Dionne, 86: 210-213 (Jan.-Feb. ’03, AJS Judicature)
• Scrutinizing expert testimony (brief), Richert, David, 84: 156 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Setting forensic science on a new path (editorial), No, Author, 92: 188, 249 (5, AJS Judicature)
• Should judges do independent research on scientific issues?, Cheng, Edward K., 90: 58-61 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Systemic flaws in our criminal justice system (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 244, 246 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Virginia’s answer to Daubert’s question behind the question, Kesley, D. Arthur, 90: 68-71 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)