Judicial/Legislative Relations in United States

Judicial/Legislative Relations

Resources

Further Reading

• A Correction (letter), McKusick, Vincent L., 77: 65 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
• Advice, consent, and inaction: How the courts can require the Senate to vote on judicial nominations, Renzin, Lee, 82: 166-174 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• AJS Model Statute to Establish A Judicial Compensation Commission, Author, No, 78: 9-11 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
• Amending the Constitution (letter), Robinson, Richard R., 80: 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• An America without judicial independence, White, Penny J., 80: 174-177 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• The author responds (letter), Renzin, Lee, 82: 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Bill Clinton States Positions on the Federal Judiciary, Author, No, 76: 97, 100 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
• Building Bridges Instead of Walls: Fostering Communication Between Judges and Legislators, Author, No, 75: 167-175, 178 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
• Communication Among the Three Branches: Can the Bar Serve as Catalyst? (query), Coffin, Frank M., 75: 125-127, 177 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
• Congress considers bill to split Ninth Circuit (focus), Tobias, Carl, 79: 198-199 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Congress to Consider Courts Study Bill, Amendments to Judicial Survivors’ Annuities Act, Garmel, Julie, 75: 272, 279-280 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
• Congressional oversight responsibility of the judiciary, Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr., 87: 202-206 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• Congressional responses to federal circuit court decisions, Lindquist, Stephanie A. and Yalof, David A., 85: 60-68 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
• The cost of justice: funding state courts, Author, No, 88: 158-169 (Jan.-Feb. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Court-legislative conflict in Massachusetts (focus), Miller, Mark C., 88: 97-99 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• The courts, the legislature, and the executive: separate and equal? Historical overview on the separation of powers, Author, No, 87: 208-218 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• The courts, the legislature, and the executive: separate and equal? Issues at the federal level, Author, No, 87: 220-229, 243, 259 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• The courts, the legislature, and the executive: separate and equal? Issues at the state level, Author, No, 87: 230-240 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 79: 298-302 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Eliminating unnecessary delays in filling federal judicial vacancies (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 83: 100 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Ensuring adequate funding for the courts (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 152, 187-188 (Jan-Feb ’05, AJS Judicature)
• The erosion of the Great Writ (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 56, 90 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Exploring judicial behaviors in the laboratories of democracy, Wolff, Michael A., 83: 267-269 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Federal Court Reform Should Start At The Top, Miner, Roger J., 77: 104-108 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
• Federal judicial vacancies (letter), Wasby, Stephen L., 80: 110 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Funding State and Local Courts: Increasing Demands and Decreasing Resources (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 76: 82-89 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
• The Future and the Courts: A Perspective from Illinois, Pilchen, Ira, 76: 137-139, 141-146 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
• Grounds for judicial impeachment (viewpoint), Finnegan, Lawrence J., Jr., 82: 155, 193 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
• High Court-Legislative Relations: A View From The Ohio Statehouse, Felice, John D. and Kilwein, John C., 77: 42-48 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
• An inspector general for the federal courts (viewpoint), Hartmus, Diane M., 81: 188-189, 219-221 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
• Issues in judicial independence and accountability, Author, No, 88: 114-121 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• The Judge Baer controversy, Newman, Jon O., 80: 156-164 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• Judicial accountability (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 4, 6 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Judicial decision making and the impact of election year rhetoric, Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 26-33 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Judicial independence and constitutional politics in Bulgaria, Melone, Albert P., 80: 280-285 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
• Judicial independence, the power of the purse, and inherent judicial powers, Webb, G. Gregg and Whittington, Keith E., 88: 12-19, 45 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• Judicial Independence: An Introduction (introduction), Author, No, 80: 155 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• Jury reform: the Arizona experience, Dann, B. Michael and Logan, George, III, 79: 280-286 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Lawmaker Attitudes Toward Court Reform In Massachusetts, Miller, Mark C., 77: 34-41 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
• Legislative-judicial relations on contested issues: Taxes and same-sex marriage, DeMary, Michele, 89: 202-211 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Listening to Judge Lefkow (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 240, 242 (May-June ’05, AJS Judicature)
• The miracle of jury reform in New York, Levine, James P. and Zeidman, Steven, 88: 178-184 (Jan.-Feb. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the federal government, Resnik, Judith, 79: 118-125 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
• A new approach to long-range planning for the federal courts (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 79: 4-5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
• Ninth Circuit update (letter), Tobias, Carl, 80: 5, 49 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Not far enough (letter), Cohn, Avern, 79: 101 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
• Not supported by data (letter), Newman, Jon O., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Of laws and sausages (viewpoint), Becker, Edward R., 87: 7-10 (July-Aug. ’03, AJS Judicature)
• Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 79: 303-309 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Policy statements or symbolic politics? Explaining congressional court-limiting attempts, Bell, Lauren C. and Scott, Kevin M., 89: 196-201 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
• Political attacks on the judiciary, Bright, Stephen B., 80: 165-173 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• The politicization of the judiciary (viewpoint), Friedman, Terry B., 82: 6-7 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
• Politics and progress in federal judicial accountability (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 90: 52-53,92 (2, AJS Judicature)
• The politics of court reform in the U.S. courts of appeals, Banks, Christopher P., 84: 34-43 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Professor Segal responds (letter), Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
• Project Seeks to Improve Communications Between Courts and Legislators (focus), Katzmann, Robert A. and Wheeler, Russell R., 75: 45-46 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
• Reining in the federal judiciary, Meese, Edwin, III and DeHart, Rhett, 80: 178-183 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• A rush to judgment (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 82: 52 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
• Sentencing reform in the wake of Booker (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 196, 231 (Mar.-Apr. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Separation of powers and mutual respect (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 87: 200-201 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• The state of the state courts, Abrahamson, Shirley S., 87: 241-242 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• Strengthening the court-legislature relationship (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 81: 96 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
• Studying the federal appellate system (focus), Tobi
  as, Carl, 80: 138, 140 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
• Supreme court/legislature at odds in New Hampshire (focus), Gray, Cynthia, 84: 291-292 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
• Three branches, not two: Congress should reconsider recent assaults on federal court sentencing discretion (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 86: 276, 324 (May-June ’03, AJS Judicature)
• Two to tango (letter), Allen, Richard B., 82: 250, 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
• Understanding statutes by understanding the drafters, Stark, Jack, 85: 190-193 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
• The United States Supreme Court and judicial review of Congress, 1803-2001, Keith, Linda Camp, 90: 166-176 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
• An unprecedented budget crisis (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 100, 102 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
• Unsound criticisms (letter), Mengler, Thomas M., 79: 57, 100 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
• The war on courts and other wars (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 90: 148,150 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
• What do judges think about the Feeney Amendment?, Davis, Andre M., Piersol, Lawrence L., and Tacha, Deanell Reece, 88: 8-11 (July-Aug. ’04, AJS Judicature)
• With unseemly speed (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 52, 101 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)