USA Law

Judicial History

Judicial History in United States

Judicial History and Philosophy

Ducks redux (viewpoint), Lubet, Steven, 91: 223-225,259 (Mar-Apr ’08, AJS Judicature)

  • Educating judges for adjudication of new life technologies, Zweig, Franklin M. and Cowdrey, Diane E., 83: 157-161 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Educating the Public About Courts and the Law (review essay), Smith, Christopher E., 75: 109-113 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Effective criticism (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 81: 232 (May-June ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The era of the choral Court, Maveety, Nancy, 89: 138-145 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Errors of justice and the death penalty: a first-hand view, Kogan, Gerald, 86: 111-114 (Sept.-Oct. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Evolution of judicial careers in the federal courts, 1789–2008, Fournet, Monique, Renée, Kopko, Kyle, C., Wittmer, Dana, and Baum, Lawrence, 93: 32-74 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • The Exercise of Advice and Consent, Simon, Paul, 76: 789-191 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Explaining Judicial Review (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 72: 4 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Explaining transformations in Supreme Court policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech, Diana, 79: 80-85 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • A federal commitment to tribal justice systems, Reno, Janet, 79: 113-117 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Federal Court Reform Should Start At The Top, Miner, Roger J., 77: 104-108 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The Federal Courts Since 1787: Stability and Change in 200 Years (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 71: 116-122 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Financing Pennsylvania’s supreme court candidates, Eisentein, James, 84: 10-19 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Fireworks on the 50th Anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subrin, Stephen N., 73: 4-9, 47 (Jun.-Jul. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The first-term performance of Justice Stephen Breyer, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce Ann, and Hensley, Thomas R., 79: 74-79 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • FOIA Uncovers Prosecutorial Abuse (letter), Korn, Walter, 66: 384 (Apr. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Foreword, Schroeder, Mary M., 90: 8 (July-Aug ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 79: 67-73 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Freshman Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1921-1991, Brown, Terry and Scheb, John M., II, 76: 239-243 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • From Pound to Harley: The Founding of AJS, Belknap, Michal R., 72: 78-90 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Funding the Federal Judiciary: The Congressional Connection, Walker, Thomas G. and Barrow, Deborah J., 69: 43-50 (Jun.-Jul. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Genes and Justice: Foreword, Abrahamson, Shirley S., 83: 102 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Genes and Justice: Introduction (introduction), Casey, Denise K., 83: 103-104 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • George W. Bush’s legacy on the federal bench: Policy in the face of diversity, Diascro, Jennifer Segal and Solberg, Rorie Spill, 92: 289-301 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Grounds for judicial impeachment (viewpoint), Finnegan, Lawrence J., Jr., 82: 155, 193 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • A Half Century in Retrospect, Winters, Glenn R., 72: 92-97 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Hard time: Reflections on visiting federal inmates, Bennett, Mark W., 94: 304-305 (may-june ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Hawaii chapter recommends unpublished opinions be citable (focus), Stanik, Kristine, 86: 162 (Nov.-Dec. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • The Hidden Conservatism of the State Court “Revolution”, Latzer, Barry, 74: 190-197 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A historical perspective on federal judicial selection, Slotnick, Elliot E., 86: 13-16 (July-Aug. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • History of judiciary web site (brief), Richert, David, 83: 317 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Hope, fear, and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology, Gold, Richard E., 83: 132-138 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The Human Genome Project and the courts: gene therapy and beyond, Mehlman, Maxwell J., 83: 124-130 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The ideology of state supreme court chief justices, Langer, Laura and Wilhelm, Teena, 89: 78-86 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Ideology on the bench (letter), Thomas, Thomas N., 80: 205 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • If A Supreme Court Vacancy Occurs, Will The Senate Confirm A Reagan Nominee?, Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., 69: 187-190 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The impact of behavioral genetics on the law and the courts, Rothstein, Mark A., 83: 116-123 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The impact of term limits for Supreme Court justices, Gruhl, John, 81: 66-72 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Improving appellate opinions (viewpoint), Cappalli, Richard, 83: 286-287, 318-320 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • In a different path: The process of becoming a judge for women and men, Williams, Margaret S., 90: 104-113 (Nov-Dec ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • In Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Merit Selection, Krivosha, Norman, 74: 128-132 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Independence (letter), Bell, Robert Holmes, 80: 205, 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Independence of character (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Individual justices and the solicitor general: The amicus curiae cases, 1953-2000, Deen, Rebecca E., Ignagni, Joseph, and Meernik, James, 89: 68-77 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • An ineffective solution (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 84: 6 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Infinity Project seeks to increase gender diversity of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (focus), Kenney, Sally J., 92: 131-132 (3, AJS Judicature)
  • An Intercircuit Profile of Judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, Haire, Susan, Gryski, Gerard S., Zuk, Gary, and Barrow, Deborah J., 78: 101-103 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Interpreting the Constitution (letter), Meese, Edwin, III, 69: 320 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Interpreting the Constitution: The Case for Judicial Restraint, Wallace, J. Clifford, 71: 81-84 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Interpreting the Constitution: The Supreme Court’s Proper and Historic Function, Shaman, Jeffrey M., 71: 80, 84-87, 122 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Introduction: Clinton’s judicial legacy (introduction), Goldman, Sheldon and Slotnick, Elliot E., 84: 227 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Introduction: Evaluating the Rehnquist Court’s legacy (introduction), Marshall, Thomas R., 89: 104-106 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • John Paul Stevens: A judicial role model (editorial), Author, No, 94: 4, 41 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judge Baer controversy, Newman, Jon O., 80: 156-164 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judge Harold R. Medina: The “Freshman” Years, Howard, J. Woodford, Jr., 69: 126-138 (Oct.-Nov. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges are human, too (viewpoint), Sisk, Gregory C., 83: 178-179, 211-212 (Jan.-Feb. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges as Lobbyists: Habeas Corpus Reform in the 1940’s, Winkle, John W., III, 68: 263-273 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges as scholars: Are they? Should they be? (viewpoint), Noonan, John T., Jr., 84: 7-9, 47 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges disagree (letter), Cohn, Avern, 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Activism and the Concept of Original Intent, Bennett, Robert W., 69: 219-223 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Appointment Politics in the 107th Congress, Holmes, Lisa M. and Savchak, Elisha, 86: 232-239 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial attitudes towards jury reform, Brody, David C. and Neiswender, John, 83: 298-303 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judici
    al Confirmation Process: Mobilizing Elites, Mobilizing Masses, Scherer, Nancy, 86: 240-250 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial decision making and the impact of election year rhetoric, Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 26-33 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial ideology and the decision to publish: Voting and publication patterns in Ninth Circuit asylum cases, Law, David S., 89: 212-219 (Jan.-Feb. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial perceptions of consensual norms on state supreme courts, Swanson, Rick A., 91: 186-196 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judicial Power: The Cement That Holds The Republic Together, Percy, Billups P., 71: 65-67 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Quality vs. Quantity (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 76: 220, 273 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Recantation: Homage to Baron Bramwell, Fidell, Eugene R., 71: 259-261 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Recruitment and Racial Diversity on State Courts: An Overview, Graham, Barbara Luck, 74: 28-34 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial review is exercised properly, Cohn, Avern, 82: 29, 32-34 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Review: The Usurpation and Democracy Questions, Melone, Albert P. and Mace, George, 71: 202-210 (Dec.-Jan. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judicial Role In Bulgaria’s Struggle For Human Rights, Melone, Albert P. and Hays, Carol E., 77: 248-253 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judicial Role in Italy: Independence, Impartiality and Legitimacy, Volcansek, Mary L., 73: 322-327 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judiciary Act of 1789: The Formal Origin of Federal Judicial Review, Mendelson, Wallace, 76: 133-136 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The judiciary is too powerful, Taylor, Clifford, 82: 28, 30-32 (July-Aug. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Antonin Scalia: A First Year Freshman Effect?, Rubin, Thea F. and Melone, Albert P., 72: 98-102 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Brennan and the Brandenburg decision-a lawgiver in action, Schwartz, Bernard, 79: 24-29 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dissent assignment, Cook, Beverly Blair, 79: 17-23 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Frankfurter and Justice Reed: Friendship and Lobbying on the Court, Canon, Bradley C., Greenfield, Kimberly, and Fleming, Jason S., 78: 224-231 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and the “Freshman Effect”, Scheb, John M., II and Ailshie, Lee W., 69: 9-12 (Jun.-Jul. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice should emphasize people, not paper (viewpoint), Denlow, Morton, 83: 50-51, 88, 90 (Sept.-Oct. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The juvenile court at 100, Drizin, Steven A., 83: 8-15 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Keeping the gate: the evolving role of the judiciary in admitting scientific evidence, Walsh, Joseph T., 83: 140-143 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Law, Morals and Justice Holmes, Kellogg, Frederick R., 69: 214-218 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Legal information vs. legal advice: Developments during the last five years, Greacen, John M., 84: 198-204 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Legitimate activities (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 80: 250 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Legitimate criticism (letter), Conners, Frank J., 80: 5 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Lessons for judges from the Civil Justice Reform Act (viewpoint), McArthur, John Burritt, 83: 222-223, 273-274 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Let Ideas Flourish: How We Can Improve Our Justice System, Kastenmeier, Robert W., 72: 122-124 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Looking Back and Looking Forward, Frankel, Jack E., 75: 83-85, 113 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Maintaining Citizen Sovereignty (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 69: 320-321 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • The Memos of Supreme Court Law Clerk William Rehnquist: Conservative Tracts, or Mirrors of His Justice’s Mind?, Brenner, Saul, 76: 77-81 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Mischaracterized Views (letter), Posner, Richard A., 69: 321 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • A model system? (viewpoint), Flanders, Steven, 81: 142-143, 176 (Jan.-Feb. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Money in Texas Supreme Court elections: 1980-1998, Cheek, Kyle and Champagne, Anthony, 84: 20-25 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Moral Authority And Gender Difference: Georgia Bullock And The Los Angeles Women’s Court, Cook, Beverly Blair, 77: 144-155 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Moral Principles, Traditions, and Fairness in the Navajo Nation Code of Judicial Conduct, Nso, Tom, 76: 15-21 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • More facts needed (letter), Flanders, Steven, 81: 6 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the federal government, Resnik, Judith, 79: 118-125 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The National Conference of State Trial Judges: Celebrating 50 Golden Years, planning for the next 50 (focus), Domitrovich, Stephanie and Saks, Michael J., 92: 331-333 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • The Nature Of Feminist Jurisprudence, Binion, Gayle, 77: 140-143 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The Need For Judicial Compensation Commissions, Author, No, 78: 6-11 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • A new approach to court reform (viewpoint), Zimmerman, Michael D., 82: 108-111 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • A new approach to long-range planning for the federal courts (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 79: 4-5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The new certiorari courts (viewpoint), Reynolds, William L. and Richman, William M., 80: 206-212 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A New Dimension (letter), Cohn, Avern, 76: 170 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • A new era of federal-tribal court cooperation, Wallace, J. Clifford, 79: 150-153 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The new federalism: state constitutions and state courts, Gutmann, Diane S. and Abrahamson, Shirley S., 71: 88-99 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • A new measure for understanding the tenure of U.S. Supreme Court justices, 1789-2009, grofman, bernard and kline, reuben, 93: 247-252 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • The New Order in Judicial Rulemaking, Carrington, Paul D., 75: 161-166 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Nonlegal advice: The amicus briefs in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, Rossotti, Jack E., Natelson, Laura, and Tatalovich, Raymond, 81: 118-121 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Not far enough (letter), Cohn, Avern, 79: 101 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Not supported by data (letter), Newman, Jon O., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Obama’s judiciary at midterm: The confirmation drama continues, Goldman, Sheldon, Slotnick, Elliot, and Schiavoni, Sara, 94: 262-303 (may-june ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • On the perils of drawing inferences about Supreme Court justices from their first few years of service, Epstein, Lee, Quinn, Kevin, Martin, Andrew D., and Segal, Jeffrey A., 91: 168-179 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Online videos pass on lessons judges learned through their careers (brief), Ream, Michael, 95: 96-97 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Opinion assignment on the Rehnquist Court, Maltzman, Forrest and Wahlbeck, Paul J., 89: 121-126, 181 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Original intent (letter), Gangi, William, 80: 110, 145 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The origins and development of courts, Messick, Richard E., 85: 175-181 (Jan.-Feb. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Partisan imbalance on the U.S. courts of appeals, Velona, Jess A., 89: 25-34 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • The past and present of judicial independence, Burbank, Stephen B., 80: 117-122 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 79: 303-309 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The Place of Judicial Review in th
    e American Tradition: The Emergence of an Eclectic Power, Slotnick, Elliot E., 71: 68-79 (Aug.-Sep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Podcasts review notable cases; look at impact on society (brief), Ream, Michael, 95: 96 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Political attacks on the judiciary, Bright, Stephen B., 80: 165-173 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The politicization of retention elections: Lessons from the defeat of justices Lanphier and White, Reid, Traciel V., 83: 68-77 (Sept.-Oct. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The politics of court reform in the U.S. courts of appeals, Banks, Christopher P., 84: 34-43 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The politics of the federal judiciary: Tiered appellate decisionmaking, Burbank, Stephen B., 89: 20-24 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Politics, privilege, and power: the Senate’s role in the appointment of federal judges, Burbank, Stephen B., 86: 24-27 (July-Aug. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • President Clinton’s district judges: “extreme liberals” or just plain moderates?, Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald, 84: 282-288 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Dorin’s Reply (letter), Dorin, Dennis D., 67: 161, 206 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Segal responds (letter), Segal, Jennifer A., 84: 115 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Project Seeks to Improve Communications Between Courts and Legislators (focus), Katzmann, Robert A. and Wheeler, Russell R., 75: 45-46 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Proposals to Amend the Bill of Rights: Are Fundamental Rights in Jeopardy?, Vile, John R., 75: 62-67 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Public expectations of courts (letter), Tracey, Ann Marie, 82: 154 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court, Marshall, Thomas R., 74: 322-329 (Apr.-May ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Public outreach: the cornerstone of judicial independence, Esterling, Kevin M., 82: 66-69 (Nov.-Dec. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • A quota system? (letter), Abraham, Henry J., 83: 5 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Real Questions About The Virtual Courthouse (viewpoint), Bermant, Gordon and Woods, Winton D., 78: 64-67 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court And American Values, Comiskey, Michael, 77: 261-267 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court and support of federal agencies, Ignagni, Joseph, Deen, Rebecca E., and Meernik, James, 89: 154-160, 181 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Rehnquist Court Disposition of Lower Court Decisions: Affirmation Not Reversal, Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., 74: 84-88 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Rehnquist Court’s shrinking plenary docket, O’Brien, David M., 81: 58-65 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Reining in the federal judiciary, Meese, Edwin, III and DeHart, Rhett, 80: 178-183 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A rejected premise (letter), Rittenberg, Leon, III, 80: 295 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Remembering Tom C. Clark (retrospect), Winters, Glenn R., 61: 135-136 (Sep. ’77, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Justice Stevens’ temperance, Greene, Jamal, 94: 11 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Three lessons learned, Marder, Nancy S., 94: 10 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Reminiscences of Justice Stevens by his law clerks: Three memorable opinions, Lee, Carol, 94: 9-10 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • The Representative Role Of Women Judges, Martin, Elaine, 77: 166-173 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Requisite characteristics (letter), Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 81: 186, 221 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Resolving state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, Feldman, Stanley G. and Withey, David L., 79: 154-156 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Restraint In Enviromental Cases By Reagan-Bush Judicial Appointees, Wenner, Lettie M. and Ostberg, Cynthia, 77: 217-220 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Rethinking the rules of evidentiary admissibility in non-jury trials, Sheldon, John and Murray, Peter, 86: 227-231 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Rethinking the rules of evidentiary admissibility in non-jury trials: another view (viewpoint), Hendrix, Danna and Slayton, Dan, 87: 51-53, 88 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • A revealing memo (letter), Cook, Beverly Blair, 80: 5 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Revisiting the Freshman Effect Hypothesis: The First Two Terms of Justice Anthony Kennedy, Melone, Albert P., 74: 6-13 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Richard Spencer Childs: The Political Reformer and His Influence on the Work of the American Judicature Society, Hirschhorn, Bernard, 73: 184-191 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Right on: The decision-making behavior of George W. Bush’s judicial appointees, Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald, 92: 312-319 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • The Role of the Bar (letter), Foulis, Ronald, 74: 289 (Apr.-May ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The role of trial judges in state court reform: The case of Mississippi, Winkle, John W., III and Oswald, Robert H., 91: 288-297 (May-Jun ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Role Orientations And Women State Supreme Court Justices, Allen, David W. and Wall, Diane E., 77: 156-165 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Rowlan F. Kirks: A Tribute, Burger, Warren E., 61: 301, 338 (Feb. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Russell, Jesse (viewpoint), Burke, Kevin S., 95: 251-254 (May-June ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • Safeguarding human genetic privacy (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 86: 224 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Seeking a strategy: William J. Brennan’s dissent assignments, Wood, Sandra L. and Gansle, Gary M., 81: 73-75 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The Selection and Tenure of Chief Justices, Vile, John R., 78: 96-100 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The Selling of Clement Haynsworth: Politics and the Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices, Maltese, John Anthony, 72: 338-347 (Apr.-May ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The Senate’s Confirmation Role in Supreme Court Nominations and the Politics of Ideology Versus Impartiality, Melone, Albert P., 75: 68-79 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A Short History of Judicial Reform in New Mexico (focus), Dixon, Eric D., 73: 48-50 (Jun.-Jul. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The significance of Brown, Ogletree, Charles J., Jr., 88: 66-72 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Social Leadership, Humor, and Supreme Court Decisionmaking, Dorin, Dennis D., 66: 462-468 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The solicitor general as amicus, 1953-2000: How influential?, Ignagni, Joseph, Deen, Rebecca E., and Meernik, James, 87: 60-71 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Solutions to Federal Judicial Gridlock, Williams, Victor, 76: 185-186, 191-193 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Some Current Debates, White, Byron R., 73: 155-158, 161 (Oct.-Nov. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • Specializing the Federal Courts: Neutral Reforms or Efforts to Shape Judicial Policy?, Baum, Lawrence, 74: 217-224 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The Spirit of Dissent, Campbell, J. Louis, III, 66: 304-312 (Feb. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • State and Federal Sentencing Guidelines: What’s Working? What Isn’t? (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 78: 207-211, 214 (Jan.-Feb. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Strategies for Judicial Research: Soaking and Poking in the Judiciary (Further Reflections on Working in the Papers of Supreme Court Justices), Ulmer, S. Sidney, 73: 193-196 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and certiorari: what determines the agenda? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 112 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and Grass Roots: Whom Does the Court Represent Best?, Marshall, Thomas R., 76: 22-28 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court and Precedent: An Analysis of Natural Courts and Reversal Trends, Banks, Christopher P., 75: 262-268 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Supreme Court an
    d public support for rights claims, Ignagni, Joseph and Marshall, Thomas R., 78: 146-151 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Supreme Court review of federal administrative agencies, Kilwein, John C. and Brisbin, Richard A., Jr., 80: 130-137 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • A Supreme Court without Protestants: Does it matter?, Scheb, John M., II, Sharma, Hemant Kumar, and Glennon, Colin, 94: 12-15 (July-Aug ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court’s experience gap (viewpoint), Fortunato, Stephen J., Jr., 82: 251-254, 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court, the Constitution and the Rule of Law, Starr, Kenneth W., 73: 159-161 (Oct.-Nov. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • The Time Taken to Write Opinions as a Determinant of Opinion Assignments, Brenner, Saul and Palmer, Jan, 72: 179-184 (Oct.-Nov. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Tom C. Clark: The Justice as Administrator, Dorin, Dennis D., 61: 271-277 (Dec.-Jan. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Tribal courts: providers of justice and protectors of sovereignty, Pommersheim, Frank, 79: 110-112 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Tribute to Justice Brennan, Seitz, Collins J., Aldisert, Ruggero J., Gibbons, John J., Seitz, Virginia A., and Pollak, Louis H., 74: 238-244 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A Tribute to Robert W. Kastenmeier (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 74: 176 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A Tribute to the Honorable Richard S. Arnold, Harrison, Jill and Yap, Elisabeth C., 88: 112-113 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Twenty Years of Sentencing Reform: Steps Forward, Steps Backward, Tonry, Michael, 78: 169-172 (Jan.-Feb. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Two Important Questions (letter), Petracca, Mark P., 75: 185 (Dec.-Jan. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Two to tango (letter), Allen, Richard B., 82: 250, 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Tyranny of the majority (letter), Diamond, Hymen, 80: 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The U.S. Constitution and Judicial Qualifications: A Curious Omission, Vile, John R. and Perez-Reilly, Mario, 74: 198-202 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • U.S. Supreme Court Review of State High Court Decisions, Kilwein, John C. and Brisbin, Richard A., Jr., 78: 33-40, 46 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • U.S. Supreme Court review of state high court decisions: From the Warren through the Rehnquist Courts, Kilwein, John C. and Brisbin, Richard A., Jr., 89: 146-153, 183 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • United Kingdom’s judicial system undergoes major reform (focus), Kenney, Sally J., 87: 79-82 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • The United States Supreme Court and judicial review of Congress, 1803-2001, Keith, Linda Camp, 90: 166-176 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Unsound criticisms (letter), Mengler, Thomas M., 79: 57, 100 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Virginia’s answer to Daubert’s question behind the question, Kesley, D. Arthur, 90: 68-71 (Sept-Oct ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • The Voice of Sandra Day O’Connor, Davis, Sue, 77: 134-139 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The voting behavior of Clinton’s courts of appeals appointees, Haire, Susan B., Humphries, Martha Anne, and Songer, Donald R., 84: 274-281 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • The Voting Behavior of Judges Appointed by President Bush, Carp, Robert A., Songer, Donald R., Rowland, C.K., Stidham, Ronald, and Richey-Tracy, Lisa, 76: 298-302 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • W. Bush remaking the judiciary: like father like son?, Goldman, Sheldon, Slotnick, Elliot E., Gryski, Gerard, Zuk, Gary, and Schiavoni, Sara, 86: 282-309 (May-June ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • W. Bush’s judiciary: The first term record, Goldman, Sheldon, Slotnick, Elliot E., Gryski, Gerard, and Schiavoni, Sara, 88: 244-275 (May-June ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • W. Bush’s judicial legacy: Mission accomplished,, Goldman, Sheldon, Schiavoni, Sara, and Slotnick, Elliot E., 92: 258-288 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Wachtler v. Cuomo: The Limits of Inherent Powers, Glaser, Howard B., 78: 12-24 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The war on courts and other wars (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 90: 148,150 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Warren Burger: a man of ‘common sense and practical ideas’, Wheeler, Russell R., 79: 8-9 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • What Can the American Adversary System Learn from an Inquisitorial System of Justice? (query), Strier, Franklin, 76: 109-111, 161-162 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • What does it mean to be a good lawyer?: Prosecutors, defenders and problem-solving courts, Feinblatt, John and Denckla, Derek, 84: 206-214 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • What is a traditional judge anyway? Problem solving in the state courts, Berman, Greg, 84: 78-85 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • What judicial candidates can say (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 4 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • What’s So Funny? (letter), Fishler, Bennett H., Jr., 67: 161 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Where have all the politicians gone? Recruiting for the modern Supreme Court, Peretti, Terri L., 91: 112-122 (Nov-Dec ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Who participates as amici curiae in the U.S. courts of appeals?, Collins, Paul M., Jr. and Martinek, Wendy L., 94: 128-136 (Nov-Dec ’10, AJS Judicature)
  • Why should we care about independent and accountable judges? (viewpoint), Fein, Bruce and Neuborne, Burt, 84: 58-63 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Women as Supreme Court Candidates: From Florence Allen to Sandra O’Connor, Cook, Beverly Blair, 65: 314-326 (Dec.-Jan. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Women In The Judiciary: An Introduction (introduction), Carbon, Susan, 65: 285 (Dec.-Jan. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Women Justices In Texas (letter), Phillips, Thomas R., 77: 184 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Women On The Bench: A Brief History, Berkson, Larry C., 65: 286-293 (Dec.-Jan. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Women On The Bench: A Different Voice?, Martin, Elaine, 77: 126-128 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Women’s Rights Litigation in the 1980s: More of the Same?, George, Tracey E. and Epstein, Lee, 74: 314-321 (Apr.-May ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The work of appellate judges (viewpoint), Sweeney, Dennis J., 85: 59, 94-95 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)

  • Resources

    Further Reading

    • Judicial diversity—an essential component of a fair justice system (editorial), no, author, 93: 180, 182 (5, AJS Judicature)
    • A ‘representative’ Supreme Court? The Thomas, Ginsburg, and Breyer appointments, Perry, Barbara A. and Abraham, Henry J., 81: 158-165 (Jan.-Feb. ’98, AJS Judicature)
    • “A Bench Happily Filled:” Some Historical Reflections on the Supreme Court Appointment Process, Abraham, Henry J., 66: 282-295 (Feb. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • The “Bush Twins?” Roberts, Alito, and the conservative agenda, Perry, Barbara A., 92: 302-311 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • “Diversity on the Bench: Is the ‘Wise Latina’ a Myth?” (focus), Andersen, Seth S., 93: 208-209 (5, AJS Judicature)
    • “Firsts” in high court diversity (focus), Reddick, Malia and Gray, Sara, 94: 186-187 (Jan-Feb ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • “Strict Scrutiny?” The content of Senate judicial confirmation hearings during the George W. Bush administration, Dancy, Logan, Nelson, Kjersten R., and Ringsmuth, Eve M., 95: 126-135 (Nov.-Dec. ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • 1,000 Judges – The Limit for an Effective Federal Judiciary, Newman, Jon O., 76: 187-188, 194 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • The 2010 judicial retention elections in perspective: Continuity and change from 1964 to 2010, Aspin, Larry, 94: 218-232 (Mar.-Apr. ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • 2020 Vision: A Bifocal View, Tigar, Michael E., 74: 89-92 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • The 21st-century American jury: reflections from the Cantigny Conference, Boatright, Robert G., 83: 288-296 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Adjusting the compensation of federal judges (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 80: 248 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Advice and consent during the Bush year
      s: The politics of confirming federal judges, Binder, Sarah and Maltzman, Forrest, 92: 320-329 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • Advice, consent, and inaction: How the courts can require the Senate to vote on judicial nominations, Renzin, Lee, 82: 166-174 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
    • The Alaska merit selection system at work, 1984-2007, Carns, Teresa White, 93: 102-108 (3, AJS Judicature)
    • Amending the Constitution (letter), Robinson, Richard R., 80: 242 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • An America without judicial independence, White, Penny J., 80: 174-177 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • The American Judicature Society and Court Reform: A Brief Chronology, Author, No, 72: 91 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • American public opinion and the Rehnquist Court, Marshall, Thomas R., 89: 177-180 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • The American public’s assessment of the Rehnquist Court, Kritzer, Herbert M., 89: 168-176 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Amici curiae during the Rehnquist years, Owens, Ryan J. and Epstein, Lee, 89: 127-132 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation, O’Connor, Karen, 66: 256-264 (Dec.-Jan. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Anastasoff v. United States: an update (focus), Braun, Jerome I., 85: 93-94 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Architect Robert Mills and his influence on criminal justice structural design, Toth, Reid C., 90: 177-180 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Are Clinton’s judges “old” Democrats or “new” Democrats?, Scherer, Nancy, 84: 150-154 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Are the justices serving too long? An assessment of tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court, McGuire, Kevin T., 89: 8-15 (July-Aug. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Assessing the conservatism of the Rehnquist Court, Hensley, Thomas R. and Smith, Christopher E., 77: 83-89 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Assessing the Senate judicial confirmation process: The Index of Obstruction and Delay, Goldman, Sheldon, 86: 251-257 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
    • Attacks on judges: Why they fail, Friedman, Barry, 81: 150-155 (Jan.-Feb. ’98, AJS Judicature)
    • The author responds (letter), Renzin, Lee, 82: 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
    • Author’s Response (letter), Melone, Albert P., 72: 4 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • The authors respond (letter), Perry, Barbara A. and Abraham, Henry J., 81: 221 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
    • The authors respond (letter), Reynolds, William L. and Richman, William M., 81: 6, 40-41 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • The Authors Respond (letter), Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., 69: 321 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Bargaining and accommodation on the United States Supreme Court: Insight from Justice Blackman, Corley, Pamela C., 90: 157-165 (Jan-Feb ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Best Kept Secrets of the Judiciary, O’Brien, Tim, 73: 341-343 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • Beyond Legislative Lobbying: Women’s Rights Groups and the Supreme Court, O’Connor, Karen and Epstein, Lee, 67: 134-143 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Bias in the bar? ABA ratings and federal judicial nominees from 1976-2000, Koeing, Dustin, 95: 188-195 (Jan.-Feb. ’12, AJS Judicature)
    • A biased opinion (letter), Sage, Larry Guy, 80: 205 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • The Bill of Rights – Its Origins and Its Keepers, Moyer, Thomas J., 75: 57-61 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Boyz to Men … and back again? Revisiting a forgotten experiment in juvenile justice, Willrich, Michael, 82: 285-292 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
    • A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munsterman, G. Thomas, 79: 216-219 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
    • Britain appoints first woman Law Lord (focus), Kenney, Sally J., 87: 189-190 (Jan.-Feb. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Brown at 50: The road that lies behind us and the challenges ahead, Clark, Hunter R., 88: 56-59 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Building Bridges Instead of Walls: Fostering Communication Between Judges and Legislators, Author, No, 75: 167-175, 178 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Bush’s Judicial Legacy: The Final Imprint, Goldman, Sheldon, 76: 282-297 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Cameras In State Courts: A Historical Perspective, Strickland, Ruth Ann and Moore, Richter H., Jr., 78: 128-135, 160 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • The Case Against Mandatory Court-Annexed ADR Programs, Eisele, G. Thomas, 75: 34-40 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • The Case For Large Federal Courts of Appeals (viewpoint), Wallace, J. Clifford, 77: 288-289 (May-Jun. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • The challenges facing tribal courts today, Endreson, Douglas B.L., 79: 142-146 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • Changing backgrounds of U.S. district judges: Likely causes and possible implications, Wheeler, Russell R., 93: 140-149 (4, AJS Judicature)
    • The changing role of the trial judge (viewpoint), Ludwig, Edmund V., 85: 216-217, 253 (Mar.-Apr. ’02, AJS Judicature)
    • The Chief Justice as Advocate-in-Chief: Examining the Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, Vining, Richard,, Jr. and Wilhelm, Teena, 95: 267-274 (May-June ’12, AJS Judicature)
    • Chief Justice Rehnquist as third branch leader, Wheeler, Russell R., 89: 116-120 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Chief Justice Rehnquist: “poster child” for the attitudinal model, Spaeth, Harold J., 89: 108-115 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer, 1939-2010, Pfeifer, Paul E., 93: 183 (5, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton and diversification of the federal judiciary, Spill, Rorie L. and Bratton, Kathleen A., 84: 256-261 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • The Clinton clones: Ginsburg, Breyer, and the Clinton legacy, O’Connor, Karen and Palmer, Barbara, 84: 262-273 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton’s judges: summing up the legacy, Goldman, Sheldon, Slotnick, Elliot E., Gryski, Gerard, and Zuk, Gary, 84: 228-254 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton’s legacy or Bork’s? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 224 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton’s Nontraditional Judges: Creating A More Representative Bench, Goldman, Sheldon and Saronson, Matthew D., 78: 68-73 (Sep.-Oct. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Clinton’s second term judiciary: picking judges under fire, Goldman, Sheldon and Slotnick, Elliot E., 82: 264-284 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
    • Collegiality among Supreme Court justices? An early assessment of the Roberts Court, Yalof, David A., Mello, Joseph, and Schmidt, Patrick, 95: 12-19 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • Collegiality and the Court of Appeals, Seitz, Collins J., 75: 26-27 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Collegiality and the District Courts, Ziegler, Donald E., 75: 74-75 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Communication Among the Three Branches: Can the Bar Serve as Catalyst? (query), Coffin, Frank M., 75: 125-127, 177 (Oct-Nov ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Comparative Aspects Of Judicial Review: Issues Facing The New European States, Utter, Robert F. and Lundsgaard, David C., 77: 240-247 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • The Confirmation Process: Too Much Advice and Too Little Consent, Reynolds, W. Bradford, 75: 80-82 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Congress Accepts Supreme Court’s Invitation to Codify Supplemental Jurisdiction, Mengler, Thomas M., Burbank, Stephen B., and Rowe, Thomas D., Jr., 74: 213-216 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Congress as Court: The Role of the Judiciary in Protecting Witnesses’ Rights, Kaufman, Irving R., 71: 184-185, 224-226 (Dec.-Jan. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Congressional oversight responsibility of the judiciary, Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr., 87: 202-206 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Consensus In The Unanimous Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, Spaeth, Harold J., 72: 274-281 (Feb.-Mar. ’89, AJS Judicature)
    • Constitution and Society in Comparative Perspective , Howard, J. Woodford, Jr., 71: 111-115 (Aug.-S
      ep. ’87, AJS Judicature)
    • The continuing development of the inherent powers doctrine, Baar, Carl, 78: 22-23 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • A conversation about judicial independence and impartiality, Author, No, 89: 339-343 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • Correction, Author, No, 77: 184, 336 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Court Reform: A View from the Bottom, Lamber, Julia and Luskin, Mary Lee, 75: 295-299 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Court-Annexed Compulsory Arbitration Is Providing Litigants With A Speedier and Less Expensive Alternative to the Traditional Courtroom Trial, Broderick, Raymond J., 75: 41-44 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • The courts, the legislature, and the executive: separate and equal? Issues at the federal level, Author, No, 87: 220-229, 243, 259 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • The courts, the legislature, and the executive: separate and equal? Issues at the state level, Author, No, 87: 230-240 (Mar.-Apr. ’04, AJS Judicature)
    • Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 79: 298-302 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
    • Deciding what to decide: the Judges’ Bill at 75, Harnett, Edward A., 84: 120-127 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
    • Decision-making trends of the Rehnquist Court era: Civil rights and liberties cases, Hensley, Thomas R. and Smith, Christopher E., 89: 161-167, 184-185 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Development of tribal courts: past, present, and future, Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge, 79: 147-149 (Nov.-Dec. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • The devil in the details (editorial), Author, No, 91: 52, 54 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
    • Different Voices, Different Choices? The Impact of More Women Lawyers and Judges on the Justice System, Author, No, 74: 138-146 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • A diminished plenary docket: A legacy of the Rehnquist Court, O’Brien, David M., 89: 134-137 (Nov.-Dec. ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Distributive Justice: Majority Opinion Assignments in the Burger Court, Spaeth, Harold J., 67: 299-304 (Dec.-Jan. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Diversity and George W. Bush’s judicial appointments: Serving two masters, Solberg, Rorie Spill, 88: 276-283 (May-June ’05, AJS Judicature)
    • Diversity Jurisdiction Through the Lens of Federalism, Sloviter, Dolores K., 76: 90-93, 99 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Does the Bar Have An Obligation to Help Ensure the Independence of the Judiciary (query), Raven, Robert D., 69: 66-67, 115, 117-118 (Aug.-Sep. ’85, AJS Judicature)

    • Posted

    in

    ,

    by

    B Nicholas

    Tags:

    , ,

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *