USA Law

Judicial Congestion

Judicial Congestion in United States

Congestion And Delay

Internet theft is avoidable (viewpoint), Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 92: 7 (1, AJS Judicature)

  • Judge Schwarzer’s Response (letter), Schwarzer, William W., 76: 170, 213 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The Judge’s Role in Pretrial Case Processing: Assessing the Need for Change, Kritzer, Herbert M., 66: 28-38 (Jun.-Jul. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges or Lawyers – Who Are The Keepers of the Flame? (query), Tigar, Michael E., 74: 125-127 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Improvements Act (letter), Cohn, Avern, 74: 177 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Just, speedy, and inexpensive? Judicial case management under the Civil Justice Reform Act, Kakalik, James S., 80: 184-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Justice Impact Statements: Determining How New Laws Will Affect The Courts (letter), Davis, Robert P. and Nejelski, Paul, 62: 18-27 (Jun.-Jul. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Keeping Up With Justice: Automation and the New Activism, Lateef, Noel V., 67: 213-223 (Nov. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Law And Dispute Processing In The Academic Community, Marske, Charles E. and Vago, Steven, 64: 165-175 (Oct. ’80, AJS Judicature)
  • Let’s Try A Small Claims Calendar for the U.S. Courts (viewpoint), Schwarzer, William W., 78: 221-223, 263-264 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The Limits of “Crash” Programs, Church, Thomas W., Jr. and Heumann, Milton, 74: 73-76 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Litigation Explosion Myth (letter), Kritzer, Herbert M., 68: 90 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Little New Information (letter), Metrick, Dennis L., 68: 58 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Major Caseload Growth Predicted (letter), Marvell, Thomas B. and Moody, Carlisle E., 70: 4 (Jun.-Jul. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Making Intermediate Appellate Courts Final: Assessing Jurisdictional Changes in Florida’s Appellate Courts, Scheb, John M. and Scheb, John M., II, 67: 474-485 (May ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Management Science In The Real World of Courts, Ryan, John Paul, 62: 144-146 (Sep. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Managing Civil Litigation: The Trial Judge’s Role, Schwarzer, William W., 61: 400-408 (Apr. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • The Mansion vs. The Gatehouse: Viewing the Courts from a Consumer’s Perspective, Church, Thomas W., Jr., 75: 255-261 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Massachusetts Reassigns Judges to Attack Civil Backlog (news), Author, No, 60: 195 (Nov. ’76, AJS Judicature)
  • Measuring the Pace of Civil Litigation in Federal and State Trial Courts, Grossman, Joel B., Kritzer, Herbert M., Bumiller, Kristin, and McDougal, Stephen, 65: 86-113 (Aug. ’81, AJS Judicature)
  • Misguided judicial reform (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 81: 4 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Mistaken Objections (letter), France, James G., 62: 420, 454 (Apr. ’79, AJS Judicature)
  • Motion on the Merits: An Effective Response to Appellate Congestion and Delay (focus), Green, Dale M. and Keyes, Michael F., 70: 168-170 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Mr. Cooley Responds (letter), Cooley, John W., 68: 261, 304 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Mr. Gizzi Responds (letter), Gizzi, Michael C., 77: 125,175 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The need for uniform discovery time limits (viewpoint), McArthur, John, 80: 251-253, 296 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A New Dimension (letter), Cohn, Avern, 76: 170 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 79: 5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • New Law Eliminates Supreme Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction (focus), Weisberg, Lynn, 72: 138 (Oct.-Nov. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • New York Tries Commercial Cases Separately, Author, No, 76: 266 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Northern District of California Adopts Early Neutral Evaluation to Expedite Dispute Resolution, Levine, David I., 72: 235-238 (Dec.-Jan. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • Not The Real World (letter), Bilby, Richard M., 74: 177, 228 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Noteworthy (letter), Ward, William B., 62: 56 (Aug. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • On Senior Federal Judges and The New Social Security Law (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 67: 108 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts: A Correction (letter), Hall, Melinda Gann, 74: 65 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Opinion Filings and Appellate Court Productivity, Vickrey, William C., 78: 47-52 (Jul.-Aug. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Overburdened Courts and Underutilized Information Technology: A Modern Prescription for a Chronic Disorder, Forst, Brian, 68: 30-36 (Jun.-Jul. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Pilot Program Seeks to Reduce Civil Case Delay In California (focus), Weisberg, Lynn, 71: 288-289 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Post-Conviction Review – What State Trial Courts Can Do To Reduce Problems, Remington, Frank J., 72: 53-57 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • A Postscript on Delay and Its Future, Sipes, Larry L., 65: 114-115 (Aug. ’81, AJS Judicature)
  • Presiding in Criminal Court: An Introduction (introduction), Morris, Norval and Tonry, Michael, 72: 7-11 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Program helps reduce backlog in Philadelphia (focus), Bernstein, Mark I., 80: 196-197 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Quantity Discounts In Appellate Justice, England, Arthur J., Jr. and McMahon, Michael P., 60: 442-450 (Apr. ’77, AJS Judicature)
  • Records and More Records: How the Third Circuit Coped (And Saved Money Too) (focus), Nejelski, Paul and Gallagher, Steven G., 70: 122-124 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing Court Costs and Delay: The Potential Impact of the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Marcus, Richard L., 66: 363-370 (Mar. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing Delay In The Courts, Neubauer, David, 62: 111-113 (Sep. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing Excessive Cost and Delay in the Civil Justice System (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 77: 4, 54 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing High Court Caseload (letter), Adkins, William H., II, 64: 201 (Nov. ’80, AJS Judicature)
  • Relieving an Overworked State Supreme Court: Florida Asks Its Court of Appeal to Assist in Screening Cases (focus), Overton, Ben F., 66: 371-374 (Mar. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Remedies for Appellate Overloads: The Ultimate Solution, Stern, Robert L., 72: 103-110 (Aug.-Sep. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Re-opened for business? Caseloads, judicial vacancies, and backlog in the federal circuit courts, Collins, Todd, 95: 20-29 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Revisiting the Confirmation Process Only to Find It In the Same State of Disrepair, Reynolds, W. Bradford, 75: 192, 228-229 (Dec.-Jan. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Robert Banks Responds (letter), Banks, Robert S., 74: 228, 230 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Ruling Out Delay: A Correction (letter), Grau, Charles W., 66: 229 (Dec.-Jan. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Ruling Out Delay: The Impact of Ohio’s Rules of Superintendence, Grau, Charles W. and Sheskin, Arlene, 66: 108-121 (Sep.-Oct. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Rx for an Overburdened Supreme Court: Is Relief In Sight?, Author, No, 66: 394-407 (Apr. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: Editor’s Introduction (introduction), Author, No, 74: 111 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: The Concerns of Federal Judges, Murphy, Diana E., 74: 112, 114-115 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: The Need for Reform, Banks, Robert S., 74: 113, 115-116 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Securing the future for America’s state courts, Judge, David C., Zweig, Franklin M., Thurston, Sandra S., Turpin, S. Diane, Jernigan, Christopher C., Melnick, Daniel, and Dougherty, Clifford A., 73: 296-306 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Self-
    Executing Pretrial Conference: An Exceptional Tool for Handling Small Lawsuits (focus), Anderson, Douglas E., 71: 55 (Jun.-Jul. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Guidelines and the Changing Composition of Criminal Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis, Williams, Jimmy J., 76: 94-96 (Aug.-Sep. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Settlement Conferences (letter), Michels, Vicki, 62: 5 (Jun.-Jul. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Settlement conferences help resolve criminal cases (viewpoint), Gottsfield, Robert L. and Michkowski, Mitch, 90: 196-199,235 (Mar-Apr ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Should Court Cases Be Systematically Sequenced? (query), Nagel, Stuart S., 70: 261-263, 310 (Feb.-Mar. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Should Judges Impose Sanctions for False Pleadings? (query), Curry, Richard L., 67: 57, 99-100 (Aug. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Should We Remove Federal Diversity Cases From Federal Court (query), Begam, Robert G., 61: 302-303 (Feb. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Sixth Circuit pre-argument conference program helps resolve disputes (focus), Hackett, Terry, 75: 75 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Slaying the Monsters of Cost and Delay: Would Disclosure Be More Effective Than Discovery? (query), Schwarzer, William W., 74: 178-183 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Solutions to Federal Judicial Gridlock, Williams, Victor, 76: 185-186, 191-193 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Some Thoughts on Judicial Restraint, Stevens, John Paul, 66: 177-183 (Nov. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • Some Thoughts on the Supreme Court’s Workload, Brennan, William J., Jr., 66: 230-235 (Dec.-Jan. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Speeding Up Civil Justice, Litan, Robert E., 73: 162-167 (Oct.-Nov. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • Speedy Trial Act Delayed (news), Author, No, 63: 146 (Sep. ’79, AJS Judicature)
  • State Appellate Court Responses to Caseload Growth, Marvell, Thomas B., 72: 282-291 (Feb.-Mar. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • State Court-Annexed Arbitration: What Do Attorneys Think?, Boersema, Craig, Hanson, Roger A., and Keilitz, Susan, 75: 28-33 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A Step Forward: Tulsa’s Precourt Hearing Program (focus), Kleiman, Bonnie S., 70: 170-171 (Oct.-Nov. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 79: 181-184 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Survey of experienced litigators finds serious cracks in U.S. civil justice system (focus), Kourlis, Rebecca Love, Singer, Jordan M., and Saunders, Paul C., 92: 78-80 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • Taking Aim at the American Legal System: The Council on Competitiveness’s Agenda for Legal Reform, Hensler, Deborah R., 75: 244-250 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Telephone Hearings in Civil Trial Courts: What Do Attorneys Think?, Hanson, Roger A., Olson, Lynae K.E., Shuart, Kathy L., and Thornton, Marlene, 66: 408-419 (Apr. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Toothless Case Management (letter), Cooper, Caroline S., 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Toward Better Management of Criminal Litigation, Mahoney, Barry and Sipes, Dale Anne, 72: 29-37 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Training Institutional Masters (letter), Hay, Herbert Darrell, 68: 260-261 (Feb.-Mar. ’85, AJS Judicature)
  • Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisenberg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 79: 176-180, 199 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The unanswered question (viewpoint), Flanders, Steven, 82: 55-56, 91-92 (Sept.-Oct. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Unsettling Issues About Settling Civil Litigation: Examining “Doomsday Machines,” “Quick Looks” and Other Modest Proposals, Bedlin, Howard and Nejelski, Paul, 68: 9-29 (Jun.-Jul. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Unwarranted distrust of federal judges (viewpoint), Burbank, Stephen B., 81: 7, 41 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The Weighted Caseload System: ‘It Is Not A Faultless Arbiter of Judicial Allocation Decisions’ (letter), Bray, Douglas M., 62: 161-162 (Oct. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • What Price Court Efficiency? (query), Edelstein, Charles D., 61: 6-7 (Jun.-Jul. ’77, AJS Judicature)
  • What Should Be Done When Prisoners Want To Take The State To Court?, Hanson, Roger A., 70: 223-227 (Dec.-Jan. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • What We Know and Don’t Know About Court-Administered Arbitration, Hensler, Deborah R., 69: 270-278 (Feb.-Mar. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Who Sets The Pace of Litigation In Urban Trial Courts?, Church, Thomas W., Jr., 65: 76-85 (Aug. ’81, AJS Judicature)
  • Who, If Not Judges? (letter), Baker, Dennis M., 67: 160 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Will Courts Survive In The Urban Cauldron?, Blake, Gene, 60: 60-67 (Aug.-Sep. ’76, AJS Judicature)
  • Will the Proposed National Court of Appeals Create More Problems Than It Solves (query), Lay, Donald P., 66: 437-476 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The Worst Should Go First: Deferral Registries in Asbestos Litigation, Schuck, Peter H., 75: 318-328 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)

  • Resources

    Further Reading

    • The ‘Critics’ of Court Reform Reply to Dale Good, Gallas, Geoff, 63: 501-503 (May ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • The ‘Critics’ of Court Reform Reply to Dale Good: Political Outcomes and Case Diversity in Judicial Reform, Nagel, Stuart S., 63: 504-505 (May ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • ‘We All Get Along Here’: Case Flow in Rural Courts, Fahnestock, Kathryn and Geiger, Maurice D., 76: 258-263 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • The “Caseload Controversy” (letter), Galanter, Marc, 71: 252, 296 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • “Rebunking” A Crisis (letter), Flanders, Steven, 77: 125 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Abbreviate Appellate Procedure: An Evaluation of the New Mexico Summary Calendar, Marvell, Thomas B., 75: 86-96 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Alliance takes on domestic violence (brief), Brief, AJS, 82: 240 (Mar.-Apr. ’99, AJS Judicature)
    • Analyzing Court Delay-Reduction Programs: Why Do Some Succeed?, Ryan, John Paul, Lipetz, Marcia J., Luskin, Mary Lee, and Neubauer, David W., 65: 58-75 (Aug. ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Applying Rule 68 (letter), Author, No, 76: 170 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Arizona Implements New Rules of Civil Procedure, Author, No, 76: 266 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Asbestos, ‘The Magic Mineral,’ Creates Toxic Tort ‘Avalanche’, Pilchen, Ira, 75: 320-321 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Assessing the Impact of Pattern Jury Instructions, Nieland, Robert G., 62: 185-194 (Oct. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • Assisting children and the courts: the Federal Parent Locator Service, Atkinson, Janet, 83: 26-31 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
    • Author’s Answer (letter), Luskin, Mary Lee, 62: 454 (Apr. ’79, AJS Judicature)
    • Author’s Answer: Measuring Productivity Improves the Weighted Caseload System (letter), Doyle, Joe, 62: 162-163 (Oct. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • Author’s Response (letter), Marvell, Thomas B., 71: 296-297 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Bringing Management Science to the Courts to Reduce Delay, Nagel, Stuart S., Neef, Marion, and Munshaw, Nancy, 62: 128-143 (Sep. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • Building a Theory of Case-Processing Time, Luskin, Mary Lee, 62: 114-127 (Sep. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • California adopts new case management rules to reduce delay (focus), Hackett, Terry, 75: 108, 117 (Aug.-Sep. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Can CAT Help Court Reporters Speed Transcript Production and Reduce Appellate Delay? (query), Author, No, 69: 185, 245 (Dec.-Jan. ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Can States Adapt the Federal Rules of Evidence for Small Case Litigation? (query), Ryerson, Paul S., 67: 421-423, 464-465 (Apr. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Canadian Conference Considers the High Cost of Justice Today (news), Nejelski, Paul, 63: 350-352 (Feb. ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • Capital Case Crisis in Maricopa County, Arizona: A response from the defense, Dupont, Christopher and Hammond, Larry, 95: 216-220 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
    • The Case Against Mandatory Court-Annexed ADR Programs, Eisele, G. Thomas
      , 75: 34-40 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • The Case For Large Federal Courts of Appeals (viewpoint), Wallace, J. Clifford, 77: 288-289 (May-Jun. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Caseload Growth – Past and Future Trends, Marvell, Thomas B., 71: 151-161 (Oct.-Nov. ’87, AJS Judicature)
    • Caseload, Conflicts, and Decisional Capacity: Does the Supreme Court Need Help?, Hellman, Arthur D., 67: 28-48 (Jun.-Jul. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Civil Caseloads: The Impact of the Economy and Trial Judgship Increases, Marvell, Thomas B., 69: 153-156 (Oct.-Nov. ’85, AJS Judicature)
    • The Civil Litigation Explosion: Myth and Reality? (focus), Weisberg, Lynn, 71: 287-288 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
    • Civil trial delay in state courts: The effect of case and litigant level characteristics, Cohen, Thomas H., 95: 158-170 (Jan.-Feb. ’12, AJS Judicature)
    • Comparing Court Productivity (letter), Doyle, Joe, 63: 56 (Aug. ’79, AJS Judicature)
    • Comparing Court Productivity, Doyle, Joe, 61: 416-421 (Apr. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • Corporations as Citizens of Every State Where They Do Business: A Needed Change in Diversity Jurisdiction, Joiner, Charles W., 70: 291-297 (Feb.-Mar. ’87, AJS Judicature)
    • Could Judges Deliver More Justice If They Wrote Fewer Opinions? (query), Merrill, Charles M., 64: 435, 471 (May ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Could Settlement Masters Help Reduce the Cost of Litigation and the Workload of Federal Courts? (query), Cooley, John W., 68: 59-60, 88-89 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
    • Court Productivity (letter), Holmes, George P., 62: 414 (Mar. ’79, AJS Judicature)
    • Court Reform: Do Critics Understand the Issues?, Good, Dale W., 63: 364-375 (Mar. ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • Court Reform: Has It Been Built On An Adequate Foundation?, Gallas, Geoff, 63: 28-38 (Jun.-Jul. ’79, AJS Judicature)
    • A Court’s Remarkable Recovery From a Capital Case Crisis, Gottsfield, Robert L., Rayes, Douglas L., and Starr, Patricia, 95: 221-226 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
    • Court-Annexed Compulsory Arbitration Is Providing Litigants With A Speedier and Less Expensive Alternative to the Traditional Courtroom Trial, Broderick, Raymond J., 75: 41-44 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Courts and the “War on Drugs” (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 73: 236, 288 (Feb.-Mar. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • Creating An Intermediate Appellate Court; Does It Reduce The Caseload of A State’s Highest Court?, Flango, Victor Eugene, 64: 74-84 (Aug. ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • Crisis in the family court (focus), Glenn, Andrea, 93: 253-254 (6, AJS Judicature)
    • The crisis in the immigration courts (editorial), Author, No, 95: 56, 58 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
    • DCM’s potential (letter), Cooper, Caroline S., 81: 50 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
    • Deferral registries update (letter), Schuck, Peter H., 77: 184 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Defining the Courts’ Business (letter), Starrett, Charles H., Jr., 67: 5 (Jun.-Jul. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Delay In Civil Cases (letter), Lawler, Joseph G., 62: 414 (Mar. ’79, AJS Judicature)
    • Delay in Filling Federal Judicial Vacancies (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 74: 64 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • Delay In State Courts: Are Time Standards An Answer? (focus), Schwartz, Howard P. and Ratliff, Leslie, 70: 124-126 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Deserving of Serious Attention (letter), Gunther, Gerald, 67: 109 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • Do Mass Torts Belong in the Courtroom? (query), Feinberg, Kenneth R., 74: 237, 277 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • Do The Costs of The En Banc Proceeding Outweigh Its Advantages? (query), Kaufman, Irving R., 69: 7-8, 57 (Jun.-Jul. ’85, AJS Judicature)
    • Do We Really Understand How Caseload Pressures May Affect criminal Justice Decisionmaking? (query), White, Steven R., 64: 387-389, 428 (Apr. ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • The Drugging Of The Courts: How Sick Is The Patient And What Is The Treatment?, Author, No, 73: 314-321 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • Early Assessment Program Reduces Disposition Time, Author, No, 78: 158 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
    • Early Neutral Evaluation: A Follow-Up Report, Levine, David I., 70: 236-240 (Dec.-Jan. ’87, AJS Judicature)
    • Effective Case Monitoring and Timely Dispositions: The Experience of One California Court, Goodman, Marcia L., 76: 254-257 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • The Effectiveness of Flexible Assignment of Appeals Between Supreme and Intermediate Courts, Marvell, Thomas B., 78: 292-298 (May-Jun. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • The Electoral Connection and The Pace of Litigation in Kansas, Crynes, David A., 78: 242-246 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • The Evolving Role of U.S. Magistrates in The District Courts, Puro, Steven, Goldman, Roger L., and Padawer-Singer, Alice M., 64: 436-449 (May ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Examining The Crisis Of Volume In The U.S. Courts Of Appeals (letter), Gizzi, Michael C., 77: 96-103 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • An Exploratory Analysis of The Supreme Court’s Caseload from 1880-1976, McLauchlan, William P., 64: 32-42 (Jun.-Jul. ’80, AJS Judicature)
    • Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 79: 5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
    • Federal Court Reform Should Start At The Top, Miner, Roger J., 77: 104-108 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
    • Federal Courts Study Committee Issues Final Report (focus), Carmody, Cris, 74: 51, 56 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • A Federal Judge Declares the Speedy Trial Act Unconstitutional (news), Author, No, 61: 385 (Mar. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • The Federal Magistrate System – Under New Scrutiny (focus), Krasno, Miriam R., 67: 256-257 (Nov. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • The Federal Speedy Trial Act: New Praise for Its Effectiveness (focus), Abrahams, Steven, 65: 41-43 (Jun.-Jul. ’81, AJS Judicature)
    • Fee-Shifting Offers of Judgment – An Approach to Reducing the Cost of Litigation, Schwarzer, William W., 76: 147-153 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Fiddling While Rome Burns: A Response to Dr. Hensler, Butler, Gregory Brian and Miller, Brian David, 75: 251-254 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
    • Florida’s 8th Judicial Circuit Launches A CJIS Network (focus), Brisson, David, 74: 278-279 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
    • FRCP Amendments Update (letter), Marcus, Richard L., 67: 4 (Jun.-Jul. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • FRCP Correction and Update (letter), Marcus, Richard L., 67: 109 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • The Function and Importance of Appellate Oral Argument: Some Views of Lawyers and Federal Judges, Wasby, Stephen L., 65: 340-353 (Feb. ’82, AJS Judicature)
    • Helping the Supreme Court By Reducing the Flow of Cases Into the Courts of Appeals, Griswold, Erwin N., 67: 58-67 (Aug. ’83, AJS Judicature)
    • House Committee Authorizes More Federal Judges (news), Author, No, 61: 335 (Feb. ’78, AJS Judicature)
    • How Would The Abolition of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Affect State Courts?, Flango, Victor Eugene, 74: 35-43 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
    • The Impact of Jurisdiction Amounts on Trial Court Caseloads, Marvell, Thomas B., 69: 367-371 (Apr.-May ’86, AJS Judicature)
    • Innovative Appellate Court Processing: New Hampshire’s Experience with Summary Affirmance, Douglas, Charles G., III, 69: 147-152 (Oct.-Nov. ’85, AJS Judicature)

    • Posted

    in

    ,

    by

    Robert

    Tags:

    , ,

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *