International Security Part 5 in the United States

53
Ninth V.K. Krishna Menon Memorial Lecture on “National Security and International Law”
K.C. Pant
Indian Journal of International Law
Volume 49, Number 2, April-June 2009    p.279 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

54
The legitimate security interests of the State and international refugee protection
JUAN CARLOS MURILLO
SUR – International Journal on Human Rights
Number 10, June 2009    p.117 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

55
International Security and International Law in the Northwest Passage
James Kraska
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Volume 42, Number 4, October 2009    p.1109 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

56
The Widow’s Torment: International Religious Freedom and American National Security in the 21st Century
Thomas F. Farr
Drake Law Review
Volume 57, Number 4, Summer 2009    p.851 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

57
The Internet Bill of Rights: A Way to Reconcile Natural Freedoms and Regulatory Needs?
Francesca Musiani
SCRIPTed: a Journal of Law, Technology & Society
Volume 6, Issue 2, 2009    p.504-515 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
Within broad debates on freedom, security and human rights on the Internet – carried on during recent years in national and international fora – the proposal for the creation and adoption of a Bill of Rights for the Internet has been the subject of uneven attention and mixed reviews. Taking sLaw Journal / Law Reviewk of the renewed interest in the proposal showed by the Committee on Civil Liberties of the European Parliament, this article analyses the current state of the Internet Bill of Rights (IBR) project. The analysis briefly retraces the history and main promoters of the IBR proposal, outlines the rationale and perspectives behind it, and debates its promises, limits and future challenges.

58
The new frontier of climate law: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation (and Degradation)
Rosemary Lyster
Environmental and Planning Law Journal
Volume 26, Number 6, November 2009    p.417 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
This article analyses the efforts of the international community to incorporate activities relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation (and Degradation) (RED(D)) within the international legal framework governing climate change. Such activities were first recognised at the Thirteenth Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 13) held in Bali in December 2007. Any agreement on RED(D) at the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties (COP 15) in Copenhagen in December 2009 is likely to be heavily influenced by the Negotiating Text developed by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention earlier this year. The article also demonstrates how the United States, unlike other jurisdictions, has decided to include RED(D) provisions within the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 prior to the outcomes of COP 15. Various financing approaches to RED(D), including public funding schemes and a market-based RED(D) credits approach, are then assessed before a number of key issues associated with RED(D) activities are addressed. All of these have legal implications. They include: the crucial issue of governance; establishing baselines and national reference levels: the link between monitoring, reporting and verification, and compliance and enforcement; proprietorial rights over the carbon in the world’s forests; and legal arrangements for benefit-sharing through Payments for Environmental Services. The article is divided into the following five parts — Part I: Latest scientific evidence and forest sequestration; Part II: The international law framework for RED(D); Part III: The United States moves ahead on RED(D); Part IV: Key RED(D) issues and legal implications; and Part V: Conclusions.

59
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACourtHR), San José 25.. XI. 06 Massacre at the maximum-security prison in Lima in May 1992 / State’s partial acknowledgment of international responsibility held to be insufficient / Various measures of reparation ordered, i.a. inscription of the victims’ names to be represented in the monument “The Eye that Cries” / Case of Castro Castro Prison v. Peru
Human Rights Law Journal
Volume 28, Number 5-8, November 2007    p.172 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

60
NUCLEAR WEAPONS, HUMAN SECURITY, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
Ved P. Nanda
Denver Journal of International Law and Policy
Volume 37, Number 3, Summer 2009    p.331 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

61
Security Over Receivables: An International Handbook. Ed by William Johnston Oxford: Oxford University Press (www.oup.com), 2008. lxxiv + 750 pp. ISBN 9780199550456. £155.
David Fox
Edinburgh Law Review
Volume 13, Number 3, September 2009    p.542 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

62
War, Torture and Terrorism: Rethinking the Rules of International Security by Anthony F Lang Jr and Amanda Russell Beattie
Ben Saul
Melbourne Journal of International Law
Volume 10, Number 1, May 2009    p.402 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

63
United Nations Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Rights of People to Self Determination & the Wisconsin International Law Society: Model Law for the Regulation of Private Military and Security Companies
Jose L. Gomez del Prado and Margaret Maffai
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 26, Number 4, Winter 2009    p.1078 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

64
International Lawfare and National Security
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 15, Number 2, Spring 2009 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

65
Global Security and Procedural Due Process of Law between the United Nations and the European Union: Yassin Abdullah Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council
Giacinta della Cananea
Columbia Journal of European Law
Volume 15, Number 3, Summer 2009    p.511 LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW