Cross Claim in the United States
A secondary claim filed by parties on the same side of a legal action. A cross claim is brought by a co-plaintiff or co-defendant. This claim is separate from the overarching claim against the party on the opposing side of the main litigation. A cross claim must directly relate to a substantial issue contained in the original and larger action or a counter claim based on it.
See Also
Complaint (Civil Process) Counter Claim (Civil Process).
Analysis and Relevance
A cross claim turns a legal action into essentially a three-sided suit. It allows a co-defendant to assert a claim against another co-defendant in an effort to place part or all of the liability on the second defendant. For example, if an airline files an action against a contractor and one of its sub-contractors because of a defect in a plane it purchased, the contractor may wish to file a cross claim against the sub-contractor in an effort to demonstrate full responsibility resides with the sub-contractor. Both the contractor and sub-contractor are defendants to the initial action, but within that suit, they are contesting through a cross claim. A cross claim differs from a counter claim. In the former, claims are litigated by parties on the same side of the principal lawsuit, while the latter is litigated between the parties contesting the original litigation. A cross claim may also be called a cross complaint.
Notes and References
- Definition of Cross Claim from the American Law Dictionary, 1991, California
Cross-Claim Definition
Cross-Complaint in this Legal Encyclopedia
Cross-Complaint definition in the Law Dictionary
Cross-Claim in Foreign Legal Encyclopedias
Link | Description |
---|---|
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the World Legal Encyclopedia. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the European Legal Encyclopedia. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Asian Legal Encyclopedia. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the UK Legal Encyclopedia. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Australian Legal Encyclopedia. |
Browse the American Encyclopedia of Law for Cross-Claim
Scan Cross-Claim in the appropriate area of law:
Link | Description |
---|---|
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Family Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the IP Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Commercial Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Criminal Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Antritrust Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Bankruptcy Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Constitutional Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Tax Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the and Finance and Banking Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Employment and Labor Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Personal Injury and Tort Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Cross-Claim | Cross-Claim in the Environmental Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Browse also by :volume, titles, popular topic, category, life events related to law, case-law, list, outline, Library of Congress Classification and materialBack to Top
Explore other Reference Works
Resource | Description |
---|---|
Cross-Claim in the Dictionaries | Cross-Claim in our legal dictionaries |
Find legal topics | Browse topics from the American Encyclopedia of Law |
Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms | Find the meaning of more than 30.000 legal abbreviations and acronyms |
Browse the Legal Thesaurus | Find synonyms and related words by area of law (see below) |
Metadata | Hierarchical collection of data |
Legal Maxims | Maxims are established principles that jurists use as interpretive tools, invoked more frequently in international law |
Legal Answers (Q&A) | A community-driven knowledge creation process, of enduring value to a broad audience |
“http://lawi.us/cross-claim. | The URI of Cross-Claim (more about URIs) |
Cross-Claim related entries | Find related entries of Cross-Claim |
More Resources
Access Points to the American Encyclopedia of Law
Access to the Encyclopedia is provided by alphabetical arrangement of entries, table of cases, table of laws, briefs and tables of contents.
Legal Thesaurus Dictionary
Because some legal concepts are too complicated to compress to a single word or term, the legal thesaurus dictionary allows the reader to search for groups of terms, including synonyms, antonyms, expanded legal meanings and other terms the reader is likely to use. The resource includes lists, synonym rings , subject categories, taxonomies and a number of schemes.
Legal Indexes
The Index is a collection of entries to allow users to locate information in the Lawi Projects. After write down relevant words and phrases that you need, begin looking up the words and phrases using the index until you have located an applicable subject to review.
Indexes of All Encyclopedias:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | Z
Index | Description |
---|---|
General Index | Index of general information about the Encyclopedia |
Classified index | Headings arranged on the basis of relations among concepts represented by headings, based on the Lawi Classification Scheme |
Topical Index | A comprehensive and easy guide to the topics of the legal Encyclopedia |
Citation Index | Index of links between citing and cited entries |
Subject Index | Identify and describe the subjects of the Encyclopedia |
Alphabetical Index | A-Z Index of all the Entries |
Thematic Index | Correlation of terms in a meaningful hierarchical order |
Permutation Index | A type of index in which significant words in the titles function as subject headings |
Browse Index | Browse the Encyclopedia by Index |
Sitemap Index | Sitemap Index, including Taxonomies |
Meaning of Cross-claim
In plain or simple terms, Cross-claim means: In a civil proceeding, if there are two or more defendants, one defendant can raise a claim against another defendant.
Resources
See Also
Further Reading (Articles)
Cross Claim Riles D.C. Duo: City Sues 2 Trying to Clean Up Are, The Washington Times (Washington, DC); October 28, 1997; Hansen, Ronald J.
Defendant Dr. files cross claim v. hospital & nurses.(Nursing Law Case of the Month), Nursing Law’s Regan Report; December 1, 2010
Arbitrability of Cross-Claim under Contract with No Arbitration Clause, Dispute Resolution Journal; February 1, 2007; Anonymous
Cross-Claim Filed in Milwaukee City Hall Suit, Daily Reporter (Milwaukee, WI); December 17, 2013; Kevit, Beth
Cross-Claim Adds Wrinkle to Milwaukee’s City Hall Facade Lawsuit, Daily Reporter (Milwaukee, WI); December 13, 2013; Kevit, Beth
KPMG Flags Cross Claim in Allco Lawsuit, Australasian Business Intelligence; September 5, 2013
Forum firm files cross-claim against arena authority., The Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN); August 3, 2005
Blue Cross Claim That 39% Premium Hikes Due Only to ‘Escalating Cost of Health Care’ Trigger Calls for Regulation of Rates., Managed Care Weekly Digest; February 22, 2010
DeMatha, Holy Cross Claim Titles, The Washington Post; May 18,
2000; Jay Kroshus
Kyle is key as Cross claim crown, Belfast Telegraph; October 18, 2010
Ex-Marine’s Navy Cross claim is found to be untrue [Corrected 04/22/ 11], The Buffalo News (Buffalo, NY); April 20, 2011; Lou Michel
How Saltire is in the dock in America’s deep south; Southern Cross claim for Supreme Court, The Herald; January 2, 2004; ALLAN LAING
Guarantees – the Effectiveness of Suspension of Rights Clauses, Mondaq Business Briefing; November 28, 2012
The successful party still not entitled to costs after the appeal.(Case overview), Mondaq Business Briefing; November 2, 2011
Supreme Court Refuses to Allow Plaintiff to Amend Pleadings Where This Would Cause Prejudice to Defendant, Mondaq Business Briefing; February 5, 2014; Hutchings, Suzie
DDT CRP – Division 6 new cross claims remain Valid., Mondaq Business Briefing; June 21, 2011
Claims for contribution from joint tortfeasors under section 5(1)(c) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946.(Bowcliff Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd), Mondaq Business Briefing; March 22, 2011
Aggregation and Law, The Yale Law Journal; October 1, 2012; Porat, Ariel Posner, Eric A.
SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT’S COURT OF APPEALS ISSUES OPINION REGARDING STEARNS BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. GLENWOOD FALLS ET AL., US Fed News Service, Including US State News; April 9, 2007
When is a successful party not entitled to costs?, Mondaq Business Briefing; May 19, 2011
Leave a Reply