Criminal Procedure

Criminal Procedure in United States

Criminal Procedure Definition

The course or system of proceedings established by law, whereby persons accused of crime are apprehended, tried, and their punishment fixed.

Criminal Procedure in Foreign Legal Encyclopedias

Link Description
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the World Legal Encyclopedia.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the European Legal Encyclopedia.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Asian Legal Encyclopedia.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the UK Legal Encyclopedia.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Australian Legal Encyclopedia.

Back to Top

Browse the American Encyclopedia of Law for Criminal Procedure

Scan Criminal Procedure in the appropriate area of law:

Link Description
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Family Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the IP Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Commercial Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Criminal Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Antritrust Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Bankruptcy Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Constitutional Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Tax Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the and Finance and Banking Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Employment and Labor Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Personal Injury and Tort Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.
Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure in the Environmental Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law.

Back to Top

Explore other Reference Works

Resource Description
Criminal Procedure in the Dictionaries Criminal Procedure in our legal dictionaries
http://lawi.us/criminal-procedure The URI of Criminal Procedure (more about URIs)
Criminal Procedure related entries Find related entries of Criminal Procedure

Back to Top

Legal Issue for Attorneys

The course or system of proceedings established by law, whereby persons accused of crime are apprehended, tried, and their punishment fixed.

More Resources

Access Points to the American Encyclopedia of Law

Access to the Encyclopedia is provided by alphabetical arrangement of entries, table of cases, table of laws, briefs and tables of contents.

Legal Thesaurus Dictionary

Because some legal concepts are too complicated to compress to a single word or term, the legal thesaurus dictionary allows the reader to search for groups of terms, including synonyms, antonyms, expanded legal meanings and other terms the reader is likely to use. The resource includes lists, synonym rings , subject categories, taxonomies and a number of schemes.

Legal Indexes

The Index is a collection of entries to allow users to locate information in the Lawi Projects. After write down relevant words and phrases that you need, begin looking up the words and phrases using the index until you have located an applicable subject to review.

Indexes of All Encyclopedias:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | Z

Index Description
General Index Index of general information about the Encyclopedia
Classified index Headings arranged on the basis of relations among concepts represented by headings, based on the Lawi Classification Scheme
Topical Index A comprehensive and easy guide to the topics of the legal Encyclopedia
Citation Index Index of links between citing and cited entries
Subject Index Identify and describe the subjects of the Encyclopedia
Alphabetical Index A-Z Index of all the Entries
Thematic Index Correlation of terms in a meaningful hierarchical order
Permutation Index A type of index in which significant words in the titles function as subject headings
Browse Index Browse the Encyclopedia by Index
Sitemap Index Sitemap Index, including Taxonomies

Back to Top

Notice

This definition of Criminal Procedure Is based on the The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary . This definition needs to be proofread..

Criminal Procedure

United States Constitution

According to the Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, about its article titled CRIMINAL PROCEDURE”It was a great day for the human race,” Charles E. Merriam wrote in Systematic Politics (1945) , “when the idea dawned that every man is a human being, an end in himself, with a claim for the development of his own personality, and that human beings had a dignity and a worth,
(read more about Constitutional law entries here).

Some Constitutional Law Popular Entries

Criminal Procedure

Finding the law: Criminal Procedure in the U.S. Code

A collection of general and permanent laws relating to criminal procedure, passed by the United States Congress, are organized by subject matter arrangements in the United States Code (U.S.C.; this label examines criminal procedure topics), to make them easy to use (usually, organized by legal areas into Titles, Chapters and Sections). The platform provides introductory material to the U.S. Code, and cross references to case law. View the U.S. Code’s table of contents here.

Criminal Procedure

In Legislation

Criminal Procedure in the U.S. Code: Title 18, Part II

The current, permanent, in-force federal laws regulating criminal procedure are compiled in the United States Code under Title 18, Part II. It constitutes “prima facie” evidence of statutes relating to Criminal Procedure (including criminal procedure) of the United States. The readers can further narrow their legal research on the topic by chapter and subchapter.

Resources

Further Reading

  • After further review: A new wave of innocence commissions, Gould, Jon B., 88: 126-131 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • AJS Initial Report of the Eyewitness Identification Field Studies (brief), Mitchell, Danielle, 95: 96 (sept-oct ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Alaska’s Ban on Plea Bargaining Reevaluated, Carns, Teresa White and Kruse, John A., 75: 310-317 (Apr.-May ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Alliance takes on domestic violence (brief), Brief, AJS, 82: 240 (Mar.-Apr. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Another vacancy crisis (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 82: 152 (Jan.-Feb. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • At what price will we obtain confessions?, Kaci, Judy Hails and Rush, George E., 71: 254-258 (Feb.-Mar. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Can Pretrial Release Programs Provide Help for Overcrowded Jails? (query), Mahoney, Michael J., 67: 110-111, 151-153 (Sep. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Can Quality Improvement Principles Be Applied to Crime and the Criminal Justice System? (query), Persico, John,, Jr., 73: 66, 118 (Aug.-Sep. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • Capital Case Crisis in Maricopa County, Arizona: A response from the defense, Dupont, Christopher and Hammond, Larry, 95: 216-220 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • The capital jury: is it tilted toward death?, Bowers, William J., 79: 220-223 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Capital punishment and the administration of justice: A trial prosecutor’s perspective, Hawkins, Bill, 89: 258-261 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Close encounters of the first kind, Sullivan, Thomas P., 87: 166-167, 191 (Jan.-Feb. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • A common-sense approach to justice, Reno, Janet, 77: 66-67, 113-114 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • A Compendium of law relating to the electronic recording of custodial interrogations (focus), Sullivan, Thomas P., 95: 212-215 (Mar.-Apr. ’12, AJS Judicature)
  • Conference Considers Changes in Court Handling of Child Abuse Cases (focus), Weisberg, Lynn, 71: 169-170 (Oct.-Nov. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Congress to Consider Courts Study Bill, Amendments to Judicial Survivors’ Annuities Act, Garmel, Julie, 75: 272, 279-280 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Connecticut requires recording of interrogations, Ream, Michael, 95: 46 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • A cooperative model for preventing wrongful convictions, Stookey, John A., 87: 159-162 (Jan.-Feb. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Courts and the “War on Drugs” (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 73: 236, 288 (Feb.-Mar. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Cultural considerations in motions and sentencing, Connell, James G, III, 92: 212-215, 248 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Curbing abuse of the grand jury, Lefcourt, Gerald B., 81: 196-197 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Damned if they do, damned if they don’t: Jurors’ reaction to defendant testimony or silence during a capital trial, Antonio, Michael E. and Arone, Nicole E., 89: 60-66 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Daubert And The Need For Judicial Scientific Literacy, Miller, Paul S., Rein, Bert W., and Bailey, Edwin O., 77: 254-260 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Death Penalty Habeas Corpus: Defining the Issues, Robbins, Ira P., 73: 215-219 (Dec.-Jan. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Decriminalization in New York (letter), Jacobson, Barry, 71: 132 (Oct.-Nov. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Defending death penalty judgments, Gillette, Dane R., 89: 262-264 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Developing the right to counsel in Ethiopia, Fry, Rita A. and O’Reilly, Gregory W., 80: 112-116 (Nov.-Dec. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers, Koehler, Jonathan J., 76: 222-229 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Do Sex Offender Treatment Programs Work? (focus), Finn, Peter, 78: 250-252 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Does Procedural Due Process Make A Difference? A Study of Second Trials, Roper, Robert T. and Melone, Albert P., 65: 136-141 (Sep. ’81, AJS Judicature)
  • Don’t send kids to adult prisons (viewpoint), Rodriguez, Luis J., 83: 6, 38 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The Drugging Of The Courts: How Sick Is The Patient And What Is The Treatment?, Author, No, 73: 314-321 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Jurors, Kerr, Norbert L., 78: 120-127 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • The erosion of the Great Writ (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 56, 90 (Sept.-Oct. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Examining the Problem of Witness Intimidation, Connick, Elizabeth and Davis, Robert C., 66: 438-447 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The Facts About DNA Typing (letter), Hicks, John W., 77: 5, 55 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Federal Report and Court Rulings Intensify DNA Evidence Debate (focus), Pilchen, Ira, 76: 41-42 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Florida’s Sentencing Guidelines: Surviving – But Just Barely, Holten, N. Gary and Handberg, Roger, 73: 259-267 (Feb.-Mar. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Forcasting Jury Verdicts (letter), Ryan, John Paul, 67: 160-161 (Oct. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The Fourth Amendment (letter), Votaw, Ernest N., 60: 57 (Aug.-Sep. ’76, AJS Judicature)
  • The Fourth Amendment Past and Future (letter), Harris, Daniel M., 68: 37-41 (Jun.-Jul. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • From crime scene to courtroom: integrating DNA technology into the criminal justice system, Asplen, Christopher H., 83: 144-149 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Government Attorneys’ Ethics in Transition, Norton, Jerry E., 72: 299-303 (Feb.-Mar. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • A holistic approach to criminal justice scholarship (viewpoint), Pizzi, William T., 79: 58-59, 102 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The impact of behavioral genetics on the law and the courts, Rothstein, Mark A., 83: 116-123 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • The Impact of Sequestration on Juries, Levine, James P., 79: 266-272 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The impacts of capital cases on a federal trial court, Goldberger, Benjamin A., 89: 274-277 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Improving decisions on death by revising and testing jury instructions, Diamond, Shari Seidman and Levi, Judith N., 79: 224-232 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Increasing Offender Compliance with Restitution Orders, Davis, Robert C., Smith, Barbara, and Hillenbrand, Susan, 74: 245-248 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Initial report of the Eyewitness Indentification Field Studies (brief), Mitchell, Danielle, 95: 48 (July-Aug ’11, AJS Judicature)
  • Is justice delayed at the International Criminal Tribunals?, Meernik, James and Aloisi, Rosa, 91: 276-287 (May-Jun ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Is juvenile justice just too slow?, Butts, Jeffrey A. and Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 83: 16-24 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Is the grand jury worth keeping?, Brenner, Susan W., 81: 190-191, 193-195, 198-199 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • John Hicks Responds (letter), Hicks, John W., 77: 57-58 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Attitudes Toward Child Sexual Abuse: A Preliminary Examination, Saunders, Edward J., 70: 95-98 (Aug.-Sep. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Supervision of the Guilty Plea Process: A Study of Six Jurisdictions, McDonald, William F., 70: 203-215 (Dec.-Jan. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • The juvenile court at 100, Drizin, Steven A., 83: 8-15 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Juvenile Justice (letter), Bradshaw, H. Stewart, 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Living with the death penalty, Leyte-Vidal, Henry and Silverman, Scott J., 89: 270-273 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Meeting the challenge of rape trials (focus), Schafran, Lynn Hecht, 84: 328-329 (May-June ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Miami Drug Court Gives Drug Defendants A Second Chance (focus), Finn, Peter and Newlyn, Andrea K., 77: 268-271 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Miscarriage of justice: a cop’s view, Olson, Robert K., 86: 74-77 (July-Aug. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Misdemeanor Justice: Is Due Process the Problem?, Knab, Karen Markle and Lindberg, Brent, 60: 416-424 (Apr. ’77, AJS Judicature)
  • Mr. Harris Replies (letter), Harris, Daniel M., 68: 56-57 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • The need for expedited DNA analysis (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 82: 248 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • New Mexico creates a DWI drug court (focus), Mays, G. Larry, Ryan, Stephen G., and Bejarano, Cindy, 81: 122-124 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A New Perspective on Misdemeanor Justice, Alfini, James J. and Doan, Rachel N., 60: 425-434 (Apr. ’77, AJS Judicature)
  • North Carolina’s New Infractions Law: Decriminalizing Noncriminals (focus), Johnston, W. Lee and LaGrange, Randy L., 70: 370-371 (Apr.-May ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • Of Limited Applicability? (letter), Howard, Samuel F., Jr., 68: 56 (Aug.-Sep. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • An Open Letter to the New President About the Administration of Justice (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 76: 168-169 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Opening up Argentina’s courts, O’Reilly, Gregory W., 80: 237-240 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Roxanne, 79: 185-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Play in the system (letter), Cohn, Avern, 82: 250 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations, Sullivan, Thomas P., 88: 132-136 (Nov.-Dec. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Policymaking by Prosecutors: The Uses of Discretion in Regulating Plea Bargaining, Worden, Alissa Pollitz, 73: 335-340 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Presidential candidates respond to AJS questions about justice system, Author, No, 80: 93-96 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Presiding in Criminal Court: An Introduction (introduction), Morris, Norval and Tonry, Michael, 72: 7-11 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a comparative perspective on the criminal jury, Vidmar, Neil, 79: 249-255 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Preventing the conviction of the innocent: a compelling and urgent need, Reno, Janet, 87: 163-165 (Jan.-Feb. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • The Problems with Mandatory Minimum Sentences (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 77: 124-125 (Nov.-Dec. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Koehler Responds (letter), Koehler, Jonathan J., 77: 55-57 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Sanborn Comments (letter), Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Profitable Penalties for Lower Level Courts, Glaser, Daniel and Gordon, Margaret A., 73: 248-252 (Feb.-Mar. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Prosecutors and the Press in the Search for the Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth, Thornburgh, Dick, 75: 20-22 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Protecting Rights (letter), Truax, David, 61: 300 (Feb. ’78, AJS Judicature)
  • Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender (viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 79: 297, 329-330 (May-June ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Providing Invaluable Assistance (letter), Jacobson, Barry, 67: 56, 100 (Aug. ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • Restore habeas review for Guantanamo prisoners (editorial), Author, No, 91: 4, 43-44 (Jul-Aug ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • The Right to a Public Trial: A Need for Today’s Juvenile Court, Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 76: 230-238 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Sandwich indictments unlikely (letter), Burrell, Bob, 81: 232 (May-June ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • A second chance for justice: Illinois’ post-trial forensic testing law, O’Reilly, Gregory W., 81: 114-117 (Nov.-Dec. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Second-class justice, first-class punishment: The use of juvenile records in sentencing adults, Sanborn, Joseph B., Jr., 81: 206-213 (Mar.-Apr. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • Senate, House pass juvenile justice bills (focus), Author, No, 83: 32 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Conference Examines Reform Impact (focus), Krasno, Miriam R., 67: 409-411 (Mar. ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Sentencing Reforms and Racial Disparities (viewpoint), Tonry, Michael, 78: 118-119, 159-160 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Settlement conferences help resolve criminal cases (viewpoint), Gottsfield, Robert L. and Michkowski, Mitch, 90: 196-199,235 (Mar-Apr ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • The shadow of death: The effect of capital punishment on American criminal law and policy, Steiker, Carol and Steiker, Jordan, 89: 250-253 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Should we rush to reform the criminal jury? Consider conviction rate data., Vidmar, Neil, Beale, Sara Sun, Rose, Mary, and Donnelly, Laura F., 80: 286-290 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • The smaller the jury, the greater the unpredictability, Saks, Michael J., 79: 263-265 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • State Post-Conviction Representation of Defendants Sentenced to Death, Wilson, Richard J. and Spangenberg, Robert L., 72: 331-337 (Apr.-May ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • States Before the U.S. Supreme Court: Direct Representation in Cases Involving Criminal Rights, 1969-1984, Epstein, Lee and O’Connor, Karen, 70: 305-306 (Feb.-Mar. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • States Before the U.S. Supreme Court: State Attorneys General as Amicus Curiae, Morris, Thomas R., 70: 298-305 (Feb.-Mar. ’87, AJS Judicature)
  • The Supreme Court’s experience gap (viewpoint), Fortunato, Stephen J., Jr., 82: 251-254, 300 (May-June ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Systemic flaws in our criminal justice system (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 89: 244, 246 (Mar.-Apr. ’06, AJS Judicature)
  • Theory versus practice of Italian criminal justice reform, Fabri, Marco, 77: 211-216 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Unavailable Witnesses and Due Process (letter), Murret, Eugene J., 65: 336 (Feb. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • The Use And Misuse Of Expert Evidence In The Courts (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 77: 68-76 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Using Jury Forcasts in Criminal Defense Strategy, Levine, James P., 66: 448-461 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • The Value of Remanded Cases (letter), Troutman, Charles H., 66: 4 (Jun.-Jul. ’82, AJS Judicature)
  • The Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 – Does It Promise More Than The System Can Deliver? (focus), Krasno, Miriam R., 66: 469-471 (May ’83, AJS Judicature)
  • What Can the American Adversary System Learn from an Inquisitorial System of Justice? (query), Strier, Franklin, 76: 109-111, 161-162 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • What can we learn from other nations about the problem of wrongful conviction?, Huff, C. Ronald, 86: 91-97 (Sept.-Oct. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • What Does Sentencing Reform Do To Criminal Appeals?, Hanson, Roger A. and Chapper, Joy, 72: 50-52 (Jun.-Jul. ’88, AJS Judicature)
  • What’s Old and What’s New About the Insanity Plea (review essay), Milner, Neal, 67: 499-509 (May ’84, AJS Judicature)
  • Worthwhile DNA Questions (letter), Thompson, William C., 77: 57 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Resources

    See Also

  • Legal Topics.
  • Criminal Procedure; Double Jeopardy. Automobile Searches; Custodial Interrogation; Incorporation Doctrine; Prisoners’ Rights; Public Defender; Right to Counsel.

    Adversary System; Burden of Proof; Civil and Criminal Divide; Confessions; Counsel: Role of Counsel; Criminal Justice Process; Criminal Procedure: Constitutional Aspects; Criminal Procedure: Comparative Aspects; Cross-Examination; Discovery; Exclusionary Rule; Jury: Behavioral Aspects; Jury: Legal Aspects; Publicity in Criminal Cases; Venue.

    Criminal responsibility, historical concepts; Mens rea ; Misdemeanor; Civil Trials; International Trials.

    Related Case Law

    Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972).

    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965).

    In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).

    Lowenfeld v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231, 235 (1988).

    Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. (1963).

    Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966).

    United States v. Spock, 416 F.2d 165 (1st Cir. 1969).

    Further Reading (Books)

    American Bar Association, Center for Professional Responsibility. Annotated Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. 3d ed. Chicago: ABA, 1996.

    Devitt, Edward J.; Blackmar, Charles B.; and Wolff, Michael A. Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, vol. 1. 4th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1987.

    Frank, Jerome. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Frankel, Marvin E. Partisan Justice. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.

    Mauet, Thomas A. Fundamentals of Trial Techniques. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1996.

    Pizzi, William T. Trials without Truth: Why Our Criminal Justice System Has Become an Expensive Failure and What We Need to Do to Rebuild It. New York: NYU Press, 1999.

    Strier, Franklin. Reconstructing Justice: An Agenda for Trial Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Strong, John William, ed. McCormick on Evidence. 4th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1992. With periodic supplements.

    Further Reading (Articles)

    The real-world shift in criminal procedure, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; January 1, 2003; Bibas, Stephanos

    The Real-World Shift in Criminal Procedure, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; January 1, 2003; Bibas, Stephanos

    Criminal Procedure, Gale Encyclopedia of Everyday Law; January 1, 2006

    JOHNSON V. CALIFORNIA: THE SUPREME COURT INVADES THE STATES’ AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURES, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; April 1, 2006; Smith, Jacob

    Johnson V. California: The Supreme Court Invades the States’ Authority to Establish Criminal Procedures, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; March 22, 2006; Smith, Jacob

    Osce Centre Holds High-Level Discussion on Criminal Procedure Legislation Reform, States News Service; March 6, 2014

    Criminal-procedure code amendment to favour children, NATION, The Nation (Thailand); April 14, 1998; Opas Boonlom

    Osce Centre Holds Discussion on Kazakhstan’s New Criminal Procedure Legislation, States News Service; March 15, 2013

    Effective criminal procedures and judicial strength, THE INDEPENDENT, The Independent (Bangladesh); August 14, 2000; Mahbub Husain Khan

    Criminal procedure, 7th ed.(Brief Article)(Book Review), Reference & Research Book News; November 1, 2007

    Comprehensive criminal procedure, 3d ed. (online access included).(Brief article)(Book review), Reference & Research Book News; October 1, 2011

    ESTABLISHMENT OF STUDY GROUP ON TRADE SECRET PROTECTION IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURES., States News Service; November 15, 2010

    Osce Supports Discussion on Role of Defence Lawyers in Criminal Procedures in Kazakhstan, States News Service; February 28, 2013

    Criminal procedures; cases, statutes, and executive materials, 4th ed.(Brief article)(Book review), Reference & Research Book News; December 1, 2011

    Victims in criminal procedure, 3d ed.(Brief article)(Book review), Reference & Research Book News; April 1, 2011

    Supreme Court case briefs in criminal procedures.(Brief Article)(Book Review), Reference & Research Book News; November 1, 2007

    NEW ZEALAND: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BILL GETS KICKSTART., US Fed News Service, Including US State News; June 6, 2008

    Majlis Session Discusses Law on Criminal Procedures, Times of Oman (Muscat, Oman); December 30, 2013

    Criminal procedures: the police; cases, statutes, and executive materials, 4th ed.(Brief article)(Book review), Reference & Research Book News; October 1, 2011

    Sudan: Parliament passes criminal procedures Act despite oppositions’ “walk out”., BBC Monitoring International Reports; May 26, 2009

    Criminal Procedure: in the United States

    Introduction to Criminal Procedure

    The English colonists who came to North America in the 17th century brought their legal traditions with them. After the American Revolution (1775-1783), the English common law-including the adversarial approach to criminal procedure-remained as the basis of law in the United States.

    The United States has a federal system, meaning that power is divided between a central authority and many state or local authorities (see Federalism). Thus, there are 51 different sets of criminal procedural law in the United States-that of the federal government and one for each of the 50 states. In addition, separate criminal procedures exist for military courts and for federal territories. The procedures adopted by each state and the federal government vary. However, the shared heritage of the English common law provides significant similarities in the basic structure of the process. Furthermore, the Constitution of the United States imposes some limitations on the states in formulating their criminal procedure.” (1)

    Resources

    Notes and References

    Guide to Criminal Procedure

    In this Section

    Criminal Procedure, Federal Criminal Procedure, State Criminal Procedure


Posted

in

, , ,

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *