Controversy in the United States
A properly asserted legal claim made in a manner appropriate for judicial response. A case or controversy may be decided by federal courts under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. For a case to constitute a bona fide controversy sufficient to satisfy Article III requirements (1) it must involve parties who are truly contending or adverse, (2) there must exist a recognizable legal interest arising out of a legitimate fact situation, and (3) the issue must be capable of resolution through the use of judicial power. Similar if not identical threshold conditions exist in state law as an entry condition for state courts. A person bringing a claim or petitioning a court is known as a party or litigant. The initiating party to a legal action is also called a plaintiff or Petitioner (Judicial Function). The party against whom such action may be brought is a defendant or respondent. Cases are named for the parties involved. The designation et al. is used after the first named party in a suit where there are several plaintiffs or defendants. Cases designated in re, or “in the matter of,” are proceedings that are not wholly adversarial, such as a juvenile case. The abbreviation ex. rel. may be made when a legal action is initiated by the state at the instigation of a party with a private interest in the result.
See Also
Adversary System (Judicial Function) Justiciable Issue (Judicial Function) Standing (Judicial Function).
Analysis and Relevance
A case or controversy is a justiciable case. In Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Haworth (300 U.S. 227: 1937), the Supreme Court described a justiciable case as one in which the controversy is “definite and concrete,” touching the legal relations of parties having “adverse legal interests.” Such a controversy must also be “real and substantial, admitting to specific relief through a decree of a conclusive character.” A true case or controversy is opposite from a hypothetical or abstract question upon which a court might render an advisory opinion. Substantial restrictions exist on the capacity of courts—federal or state—to hear cases of a hypothetical or abstract nature. The Supreme Court also restrains itself when it reviews actions of the other branches. The basic ground rules were nicely articulated by Justice Louis Brandeis in Ashwander v. TVA (297 U.S. 288: 1936). The “Ashwander rules” urge the Court to make every effort to find statutes constitutional if at all possible. The rules also encourage the Court to focus on the narrowest possible grounds for decision and to avoid the broad constitutional questions when it can.
Notes and References
- Definition of Controversy from the American Law Dictionary, 1991, California
Controversy Definition
A dispute arising between two or more persons. It differs from case, which includes all suits, criminal as well as civil; whereas controversy is a civil, and not a criminal, proceeding. 2 Dall. (U.S.) 419, 431, 432; 1 Tucker, Bl. Comm. App. 420, 421; Story, Const. § 1668.
Controversy in Foreign Legal Encyclopedias
Link | Description |
---|---|
Controversy | Controversy in the World Legal Encyclopedia. |
Controversy | Controversy in the European Legal Encyclopedia. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Asian Legal Encyclopedia. |
Controversy | Controversy in the UK Legal Encyclopedia. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Australian Legal Encyclopedia. |
For starting research in the law of a foreign country:
Browse the American Encyclopedia of Law for Controversy
Scan Controversy in the appropriate area of law:
Link | Description |
---|---|
Controversy | Controversy in the Family Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the IP Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Commercial Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Criminal Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Antritrust Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Bankruptcy Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Constitutional Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Tax Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the and Finance and Banking Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Employment and Labor Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Personal Injury and Tort Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Controversy | Controversy in the Environmental Law Portal of the American Encyclopedia of Law. |
Explore other Reference Works
Resource | Description |
---|---|
Controversy in the Dictionaries | Controversy in our legal dictionaries |
http://lawi.us/controversy | The URI of Controversy (more about URIs) |
Controversy related entries | Find related entries of Controversy |
Legal Issue for Attorneys
A dispute arising between two or more persons. It differs from case, which includes all suits, criminal as well as civil; whereas controversy is a civil, and not a criminal, proceeding. 2 Dall. (U.S.) 419, 431, 432; 1 Tucker, Bl. Comm. App. 420, 421; Story, Const. § 1668.
More Resources
Access Points to the American Encyclopedia of Law
Access to the Encyclopedia is provided by alphabetical arrangement of entries, table of cases, table of laws, briefs and tables of contents.
Legal Thesaurus Dictionary
Because some legal concepts are too complicated to compress to a single word or term, the legal thesaurus dictionary allows the reader to search for groups of terms, including synonyms, antonyms, expanded legal meanings and other terms the reader is likely to use. The resource includes lists, synonym rings , subject categories, taxonomies and a number of schemes.
Legal Indexes
The Index is a collection of entries to allow users to locate information in the Lawi Projects. After write down relevant words and phrases that you need, begin looking up the words and phrases using the index until you have located an applicable subject to review.
Indexes of All Encyclopedias:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | Z
Index | Description |
---|---|
General Index | Index of general information about the Encyclopedia |
Classified index | Headings arranged on the basis of relations among concepts represented by headings, based on the Lawi Classification Scheme |
Topical Index | A comprehensive and easy guide to the topics of the legal Encyclopedia |
Citation Index | Index of links between citing and cited entries |
Subject Index | Identify and describe the subjects of the Encyclopedia |
Alphabetical Index | A-Z Index of all the Entries |
Thematic Index | Correlation of terms in a meaningful hierarchical order |
Permutation Index | A type of index in which significant words in the titles function as subject headings |
Browse Index | Browse the Encyclopedia by Index |
Sitemap Index | Sitemap Index, including Taxonomies |
Notice
This definition of Controversy Is based on the The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary . This definition needs to be proofread..
Resources
See Also
Scandal.
Further Reading (Articles)
The Controversy Stories in the Gospel of Matthew: Their Redaction, Form and Relevance for the Relationship between the Matthean Community and Formative Judaism, Journal of Biblical Literature; January 1, 2003; Cousland, J. R. C.
Risk, Controversy, and Rhetoric: Response to Goodnight, Argumentation and Advocacy; June 22, 2005; Miller, Carolyn R.
Requiem for a Controversy, Skeptic (Altadena, CA); March 22, 2001; Shankman, Paul
What’s Wrong with the “Teach the Controversy” Slogan?, McGill Journal of Education (Online); April 1, 2007; Scott, Eugenie C.
The Climate Change Controversy: A Technical Debate in the Public Sphere, Argumentation and Advocacy; June 22, 2011; Eckstein, Justin
Arguing History: SSSSTeaching Historical Scientific Controversies to Engage Students in Discourse and the Nature of Science, The Science Teacher; July 1, 2013; Clary, Renee Wandersee, James
Public and Technical Interdependence: Regulatory Controversy, Out-Law Discourse, and the Messy Case of Olestra, Argumentation and Advocacy; September 22, 2002; Boyd, Josh
Science and Technology Controversy: A Rationale for Inquiry, Argumentation an
d Advocacy; June 22, 2005; Goodnight, G. Thomas
The Creative Role of Controversy within the Church, The Humanist; September 1, 1999; Willoughby, Robert E.
A theatrics of protest.(The Irish Art of Controversy)(Book Review), Irish Literary Supplement; September 22, 2005; Conner, Marc C.
Design Piracy: Student Perceptions of a Constructive Controversy Activity, College Student Journal; December 1, 2007; Marcketti, Sara B.
A QUANDARY FOR THE SAGES: WHY ALL THE QB CONTROVERSIES?(SPORTS), The Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, VA); August 27, 2001
Controversy Over The Amount In Controversy., Mondaq Business Briefing; February 10, 2012
Mapping Misconduct: Demarcating Legitimate Science from “Fraud” in the B-06 Lumpectomy Controversy, Argumentation and Advocacy; September 22, 2005; Keranen, Lisa
Choose Controversies Wisely: When Teaching Scientific Argumentation, Selecting the Wrong Topic Can Impair-Rather Than Increase-Student Understanding, The Science Teacher; April 1, 2014; Berbeco, Minda McCaffrey, Mark Meikle, Eric Branch, Glenn
The Highlands Controversy: Constructing Geological Knowledge Through Fieldwork in Nineteenth-Century Britain., Science; November 30, 1990; Laudan, Rachel
The many controversies of tennis player Sania Mirza, The New Nation (Dhaka, India); April 8, 2010
The Two “I”s of Christ: Revisiting the Christological Controversy, Anglican Theological Review; July 1, 2012; Stang, Charles M.
The DSM-5 Controversies: How Should Psychologists Respond?, Canadian Psychology; August 1, 2013; Welch, Steven Klassen, Cherisse Borisova, Oxana Clothier, Holly
The many controversies of tennis player Sania Mirza., The New Nation (Dhaka, India); April 8, 2010
Leave a Reply