USA Law

Civil Justice System

Civil Justice System in United States

Civil Justice System

Resources

Further Reading

  • “Speaking rights”: evaluating juror discussions during civil trials, Hannaford-Agor, Paula, Hans, Valerie P., and Munsterman, G. Thomas, 85: 237-243 (Mar.-Apr. ’02, AJS Judicature)
  • Access to civil justice: Is there a solution? (viewpoint), Moon, Ronald T.Y., 88: 155-157,188 (Jan.-Feb. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Amici Curiae And The Supreme Court’s Review Of Fetal Protection Policies, Samuels, Suzanne Uttaro, 78: 236-241 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Anti-plaintiff bias in the federal appellate courts, Clermont, Kevin M. and Eisenberg, Theodore, 84: 128-134 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Appellate excesses (letter), Cohn, Avern, 80: 49 (July-Aug. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Applying Rule 68 (letter), Author, No, 76: 170 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Arizona Implements New Rules of Civil Procedure, Author, No, 76: 266 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Assisting children (letter), Jacobson, Sandra W., 83: 177 (Jan.-Feb. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Assisting children and the courts: the Federal Parent Locator Service, Atkinson, Janet, 83: 26-31 (July-Aug. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Balancing act: implementing a statewide, court-sponsored ADR program, Goldschmidt, Jona and Hallett, Michael, 80: 222-229 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • California adopts “plain-English” civil jury instructions (focus), Ward, James D., 87: 300-301 (May-June ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • California adopts plain-language jury instructions (brief), Richert, David, 87: 87 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • The Case Against Mandatory Court-Annexed ADR Programs, Eisele, G. Thomas, 75: 34-40 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The causation issue in computer security breach cases, Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 93: 75-76 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • Cider to Vinegar (letter), Wilbert, Paul L., 76: 214 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Civil justice reform (letter), Litan, Robert E., 80: 205 (Mar.-Apr. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A Client’s Experience With Implementing Value Billing, Baird, Zoe, 77: 198-200 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • A closer look at mandatory arbitration for consumers (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 91: 220-221,260 (Mar-Apr ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • A common-sense approach to justice, Reno, Janet, 77: 66-67, 113-114 (Sep.-Oct. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The complexity of modern American civil litigationL Curse or cure? (viewpoint), Burbank, Stephen B., 91: 163-167, 209-210 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Concurring in result without written opinion: a condemnable practice (viewpoint), Robbins, Ira P., 84: 118-119, 160-165 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Congress Accepts Supreme Court’s Invitation to Codify Supplemental Jurisdiction, Mengler, Thomas M., Burbank, Stephen B., and Rowe, Thomas D., Jr., 74: 213-216 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The contested role of the civil jury in business litigation, Hans, Valerie P., 79: 242-248 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Contingency fee lawyers as gatekeepers in the civil justice system, Kritzer, Herbert M., 81: 22-29 (July-Aug. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Court-Annexed Compulsory Arbitration Is Providing Litigants With A Speedier and Less Expensive Alternative to the Traditional Courtroom Trial, Broderick, Raymond J., 75: 41-44 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The danger of exposure to the Internet (viewpoint), Cherry, Michael and Imwinkelried, Edward, 91: 57-59 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • The dangers of the cultural defense, Morgan, J. Tom and Parker, Laurel, 92: 206, 208 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • DCM’s potential (letter), Cooper, Caroline S., 81: 50 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Describing the state solicitors, banks, miller, 93: 238-246 (6, AJS Judicature)
  • Determining the proper allocation of cases between federal and state courts (viewpoint), Newman, Jon O., 79: 6-7, 46 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The devil in the details (editorial), Author, No, 91: 52, 54 (Sep-Oct ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Do Mass Torts Belong in the Courtroom? (query), Feinberg, Kenneth R., 74: 237, 277 (Feb.-Mar. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Effective Case Monitoring and Timely Dispositions: The Experience of One California Court, Goodman, Marcia L., 76: 254-257 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • The English rule at work in Alaska, DiPietro, Susanne, 80: 88-92 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Estimating liability risks with the media as your guide, Bailis, Daniel S. and MacCoun, Robert J., 80: 64-67 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Evaluating Proposals for Civil Justice Reform (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 76: 108, 162 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Examining defendant perceptions of fairness in the courtroom (focus), Frazer, M. Somjen, 91: 36-37 (Jul-Aug ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Expert Witnesses in the Courts: An Empirical Examination, Champagne, Anthony, Shuman, Daniel W., and Whitaker, Elizabeth, 76: 5-10 (Jun.-Jul. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Exploring the issues in private judging (panel discussion), Discussion, Panel, 77: 203-210 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 79: 5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Fee-Shifting Offers of Judgment – An Approach to Reducing the Cost of Litigation, Schwarzer, William W., 76: 147-153 (Oct.-Nov. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Fiddling While Rome Burns: A Response to Dr. Hensler, Butler, Gregory Brian and Miller, Brian David, 75: 251-254 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Forensic psychiatric diagnosis unmasked, Greenberg, Stuart A., Shuman, Daniel W., and Meyer, Robert G., 88: 210-215 (Mar.-Apr. ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 79: 67-73 (Sept.-Oct. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • Hope, fear, and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology, Gold, Richard E., 83: 132-138 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • How The Shift From Hourly Rates Will Affect The Justice System, Barker, Sarah Evans, 77: 201-202 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • How To Improve Civil Justice Policy (viewpoint), Galanter, Marc, Garth, Bryant, Hensler, Deborah, and Zemans, Frances Kahn, 77: 185, 229-230 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • How To Respond To The “Problems” Of The Civil Jury (viewpoint), Schuck, Peter H., 77: 236-239, 281-282 (Mar.-Apr. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • How Would The Abolition of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Affect State Courts?, Flango, Victor Eugene, 74: 35-43 (Jun.-Jul. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • The Human Genome Project and the courts: gene therapy and beyond, Mehlman, Maxwell J., 83: 124-130 (Nov.-Dec. ’99, AJS Judicature)
  • Immigrants and other cultural minorities as non-traditional plaintiffs: Culture as a factor in determining tort damages, Donald, Bernice Bouie and Brooks, Brennan Tyler, 92: 220-223 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • The importance of culture for the justice system, Renteln, Alison Dundes and Valladares, Rene, 92: 194-201 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • Improving appellate opinions (viewpoint), Cappalli, Richard, 83: 286-287, 318-320 (May-June ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Increasing juror participation in trials through note taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and Penrod, Steven, 79: 256-262 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • An ineffective solution (letter), Salibra, Lawrence A., II, 84: 6 (July-Aug. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Inside the jury room: Evaluating juror discussions during trial, Diamond, Shari Seidman, Vidmar, Neil, Rose, Mary, Ellis, Leslie, and Murphy, Beth, 87: 54-58 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Judge Schwarzer’s Response (letter), Schwarzer, William W., 76: 170, 213 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges or Lawyers – Who Are The Keepers of the Flame? (query), Tigar, Michael E., 74: 125-127 (Oct.-Nov. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Judges’ views on vanishing civil trials, Bennett, Mark W., Downie, Margaret H., and Ze
    rvos, Larry C., 88: 306-309, 312 (May-June ’05, AJS Judicature)
  • Judicial Improvements Act (letter), Cohn, Avern, 74: 177 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Just, speedy, and inexpensive? Judicial case management under the Civil Justice Reform Act, Kakalik, James S., 80: 184-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • Lawyers’ Fees And The Holy Grail: Where Should Clients Search For Value?, Kritzer, Herbert M., 77: 186-190 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Lessons for judges from the Civil Justice Reform Act (viewpoint), McArthur, John Burritt, 83: 222-223, 273-274 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Let’s Try A Small Claims Calendar for the U.S. Courts (viewpoint), Schwarzer, William W., 78: 221-223, 263-264 (Mar.-Apr. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • A love sonnet (letter), Cummins, Robert, 91: 271 (May-Jun ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Mandatory ADR: Can We Talk? (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 78: 272, 321 (May-Jun. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • The need for uniform discovery time limits (viewpoint), McArthur, John, 80: 251-253, 296 (May-June ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 79: 5 (July-Aug. ’95, AJS Judicature)
  • New report establishes principles for improving the U.S. civil justice system (focus), Kourlis, Rebecca Love, Singer, Jordan M., and Saunders, Paul C., 93: 121-123 (3, AJS Judicature)
  • New York Tries Commercial Cases Separately, Author, No, 76: 266 (Feb.-Mar. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Not The Real World (letter), Bilby, Richard M., 74: 177, 228 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • One size does not fit all (letter), Kelley, Stephen M., 81: 50, 89 (Sept.-Oct. ’97, AJS Judicature)
  • An open letter to the new president about the administration of justice (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 84: 172 (Jan.-Feb. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • An Open Letter to the New President About the Administration of Justice (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 76: 168-169 (Dec.-Jan. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Pleading and the dilemmas of modern American procedure, Burbank, Stephen B., 93: 109-120 (3, AJS Judicature)
  • Presidential candidates respond to AJS questions about justice system, Author, No, 80: 93-96 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Presidential candidates respond to questions about the justice system, Author, No, 84: 96-98 (Sept.-Oct. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • The privatization of civil justice (viewpoint), Murray, Peter, 91: 272-275, 315-316 (May-Jun ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • Professor Robbins Responds (letter), Robbins, Ira P., 84: 226 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Proper perspective (letter), Del, Sole, Joseph, A., 84: 226 (Mar.-Apr. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Public perceptions of civil jury verdicts, Kritzer, Herbert M., 85: 78-82 (Sept.-Oct. ’01, AJS Judicature)
  • Questions for the candidates, Editorial, AJS, 91: 108-109,134 (Nov-Dec ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • Reducing Excessive Cost and Delay in the Civil Justice System (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 77: 4, 54 (Jul.-Aug. ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Reforming The Laywer-Client Relationship Through Alternative Billing Methods, Litan, Robert E. and Salop, Steven C., 77: 191-197 (Jan.-Feb. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Rethinking the rules of evidentiary admissibility in non-jury trials, Sheldon, John and Murray, Peter, 86: 227-231 (Mar.-Apr. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Rethinking the rules of evidentiary admissibility in non-jury trials: another view (viewpoint), Hendrix, Danna and Slayton, Dan, 87: 51-53, 88 (Sept.-Oct. ’03, AJS Judicature)
  • Robert Banks Responds (letter), Banks, Robert S., 74: 228, 230 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • The role of apology in tort law, Shuman, Daniel W., 83: 180-189 (Jan.-Feb. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Rule 11: Moving Beyond the Cosmic Anecdote (focus), Kritzer, Herbert M., Marshall, Lawrence, and Zemans, Frances Kahn, 75: 269-272 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: Editor’s Introduction (introduction), Author, No, 74: 111 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: The Concerns of Federal Judges, Murphy, Diana E., 74: 112, 114-115 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • S. 2648, The Judicial Improvements Act of 1990: The Need for Reform, Banks, Robert S., 74: 113, 115-116 (Aug.-Sep. ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Scrutinizing expert testimony (brief), Richert, David, 84: 156 (Nov.-Dec. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Securing the future for America’s state courts, Judge, David C., Zweig, Franklin M., Thurston, Sandra S., Turpin, S. Diane, Jernigan, Christopher C., Melnick, Daniel, and Dougherty, Clifford A., 73: 296-306 (Apr.-May ’90, AJS Judicature)
  • Slaying the Monsters of Cost and Delay: Would Disclosure Be More Effective Than Discovery? (query), Schwarzer, William W., 74: 178-183 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Social science and public policy (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 83: 220 (Mar.-Apr. ’00, AJS Judicature)
  • Speeding Up Civil Justice, Litan, Robert E., 73: 162-167 (Oct.-Nov. ’89, AJS Judicature)
  • State Court-Annexed Arbitration: What Do Attorneys Think?, Boersema, Craig, Hanson, Roger A., and Keilitz, Susan, 75: 28-33 (Jun.-Jul. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • A step above anecdote: a profile of the civil jury in the 1990s, Ostrom, Brian J., Rottman, David B., and Goerdt, John A., 79: 233-241 (Mar.-Apr. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 79: 181-184 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • Supreme Court and public support for rights claims, Ignagni, Joseph and Marshall, Thomas R., 78: 146-151 (Nov.-Dec. ’94, AJS Judicature)
  • Survey of experienced litigators finds serious cracks in U.S. civil justice system (focus), Kourlis, Rebecca Love, Singer, Jordan M., and Saunders, Paul C., 92: 78-80 (2, AJS Judicature)
  • Symposium Examines Tort Liability System Problems (focus), Burnham, David, 70: 59-60 (Jun.-Jul. ’86, AJS Judicature)
  • Taking Aim at the American Legal System: The Council on Competitiveness’s Agenda for Legal Reform, Hensler, Deborah R., 75: 244-250 (Feb.-Mar. ’92, AJS Judicature)
  • Toothless Case Management (letter), Cooper, Caroline S., 76: 281 (Apr.-May ’93, AJS Judicature)
  • Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisenberg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 79: 176-180, 199 (Jan.-Feb. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • A Tribute to Robert W. Kastenmeier (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 74: 176 (Dec.-Jan. ’91, AJS Judicature)
  • Umpiring the multi-opinion justice system (viewpoint), Ruhlin, Charles and Scheiber, Harry N., 80: 58-61 (Sept.-Oct. ’96, AJS Judicature)
  • The unanswered question (viewpoint), Flanders, Steven, 82: 55-56, 91-92 (Sept.-Oct. ’98, AJS Judicature)
  • The unique challenges of cross-cultural justice: Foreword, Lynn, Barbara M.G., 92: 190-231 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • The unique challenges of cross-cultural justice: Introduction, Ridgeway, Delissa A., 92: 191-193 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • The virtues of the cultural defense, Friedman, Rameriz, Linda, 92: 207, 209-211, 247 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • When all eyes are watching: Trial characteristics and practices in notorious trials (focus), Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., 91: 197-201 (Jan-Feb ’08, AJS Judicature)
  • When ignorance may be the defense: Immigrants and knowledge of U.S. law, Veazey, Linda, 92: 202-205 (5, AJS Judicature)
  • Why courts should care about self-represented litigants (viewpoint), Dickinson, Jess H., 91: 8-10, 44 (Jul-Aug ’07, AJS Judicature)
  • With unseemly speed (editorial), Editorial, AJS, 88: 52, 101 (Sept.-Oct. ’04, AJS Judicature)
  • Yet another survey (letter), Conners, Frank J., 92: 102 (3, AJS Judicature)

Posted

in

,

by

Robert

Tags:

, ,

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *